Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI

[Jiankang Yao]

Since EAI deployment is on the way, gmail, outlok2016, postfix, yandex, 
xgenplus and many more have adopted EAI.
In order to make EAI environment more friendly,  I suggest that this WG 
considers to move this document/work forward.

Best Regards



Jiankang Yao

From: John R. Levine
Date: 2016-09-28 01:45
To: Juan Altmayer Pizzorno
CC: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org
Subject: [ietf-dkim] DKIM and EAI
> On a bit of a side note, I wonder how much appetite there
> is for a document update?  Besides this, we have no way to
> include non-ASCII UTF-8 local parts in i=.

I wrote a draft about it, but I can't say it's gotten a lot of attention 
other than from Alexey:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth/

Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Re: [ietf-dkim] EAI and 8bit downgrades

[Jiankang Yao]

Is there any RFC which deals with EAI DKIM ?
how to deal with EAI message in the DKIM?
Do we have a decision about it?


Jiankang Yao

From: Douglas Otis
Date: 2011-05-22 22:47
To: ietf-dkim
Subject: Re: [ietf-dkim] EAI and 8bit downgrades
On 5/22/11 10:38 PM, John R. Levine wrote:

___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html