Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt
This version makes minor editorial corrections to AOL's data, adds Gmail's data, updates OpenDKIM's data, and applies feedback recently sent to the list. I propose a WGLC on this at the chairs' discretion. I don't have any additional data pending to add, and it sounds like the AD is already happy with the information that's currently there. -MSK ___ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
[ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Domain Keys Identified Mail Working Group of the IETF. Title : RFC4871 Implementation Report Author(s) : M. Kucherawy Filename: draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt Pages : 17 Date: 2010-10-04 This document contains an implementation report for the IESG covering DomainKeys Identified Mail (DKIM) in support of the advancement of that specification along the Standards Track. A URL for this Internet-Draft is: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the Internet-Draft. ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt ___ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
Re: [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-implementation-report-02.txt
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: This version makes minor editorial corrections to AOL's data, adds Gmail's data, updates OpenDKIM's data, and applies feedback recently sent to the list. I propose a WGLC on this at the chairs' discretion. I don't have any additional data pending to add, and it sounds like the AD is already happy with the information that's currently there. Wow! SMUDGING OF DATA by removing one of the most significant data points: Author vs. Third-Party: 73% of the signatures observed were author signatures, meaning the d= value in the signature matched the domain found in the From: header field. The remainder, therefore, were third-party signatures. Originator signatures: 1.2 billion Third-party signatures: 184 million Unbelievable! -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com ___ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
