Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (5137)

2017-10-04 Thread Dave Crocker

(re-setn, trying to use addresses for Tony and Murray that might work... /d)


On 10/3/2017 7:24 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Peter Smith

Section: 3.6.1

Original Text
-
   key-k-tag= %x76 [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-k-tag-type


Corrected Text
--
   key-k-tag= %x6b [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-k-tag-type


Notes
-
The key-k-tag should (presumably) start with the letter "k" to match the other key-LETTER-tag definitions and 
to match the "k=" heading.  However, the ABNF specifies %76 which is the letter "v", not the letter 
"k".  The correct value is %x6b.



oops.

d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html


Re: [ietf-dkim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6376 (5137)

2017-10-03 Thread Dave Crocker

On 10/3/2017 7:24 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

Type: Technical
Reported by: Peter Smith

Section: 3.6.1

Original Text
-
   key-k-tag= %x76 [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-k-tag-type


Corrected Text
--
   key-k-tag= %x6b [FWS] "=" [FWS] key-k-tag-type


Notes
-
The key-k-tag should (presumably) start with the letter "k" to match the other key-LETTER-tag definitions and 
to match the "k=" heading.  However, the ABNF specifies %76 which is the letter "v", not the letter 
"k".  The correct value is %x6b.



oops.

d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
___
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html