Re: [Ilugc] how to clean cache - & packages in Kubuntu 10.10
Hi, On Sunday 25 September 2011 11:25:57 AM IST, Aathi Narayanan wrote: > anybody please give suggestion for me > how to copy file from one login to another login in novell netware > i want to transfer some file from novell netware Do not hijack threads. Start a separate thread for your question. This thread is about 'how to clean cache - & packages in Kubuntu 10.10'. Thanks & Regards, Guruprasad ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] how to clean cache - & packages in Kubuntu 10.10
anybody please give suggestion for me how to copy file from one login to another login in novell netware i want to transfer some file from novell netware ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
[Ilugc] novell netware
how to copy file from one login to another login in novell netware... anybody please give suggestion for me . i want to transfer file from my login to somebody login ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] How to know the Size of Graphic Card?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Akilan R wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Prasanna Venkatesh > wrote: > > > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core > > Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA > > controller]) > >Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device c0a5 > >Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 51 > > *Memory at f540 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M] > >Memory at c000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]* > >I/O ports at e000 [size=64] > >Expansion ROM at [disabled] > >Capabilities: > >Kernel driver in use: i915 > >Kernel modules: i915 > > > > Do not top post. If this is the only VGA entry you have got, then I'm > afraid > you do *not* have a separate graphics card. i think in such a case he should look for additional drivers. am not sure about it. -- Regards, Prasanna Venkadesh PuduvaiLUG (puduvai Linux Users Group): http://puduvailug.wordpress.com/ FOSS Jobs all over India: http://fossjobs.in ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
[Ilugc] Fwd: [chennai.rb] [JOB] ROR opening for a product development firm in Chennai
-- Forwarded message -- From: "Ananth Bashyam" Date: 24 Sep 2011 20:40 Subject: [chennai.rb] [JOB] ROR opening for a product development firm in Chennai To: Our client is a world leader in Agile based product development. They are looking for ROR experts to join their team. Excellent pay and an opportunity to work on high stake projects. The details are given below: http://expertiz.in/component/jobgroklist/posting/posting/225/62.html The company is headquartered in US with several development centers in US, Europe and Australia. They've a 150+ engineering team in Chennai. If interested, please send your resume to ananth[at]expertiz[dot]in. You can also refer a friend. All successful referrals are eligible for a cash bonus. Best Regards, Ananth ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] LAMP setup which distro is good
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > The goal of sticking to a single release is essentially because it is a known > quantity and that is very important when you have hundreds or thousands > of systems or even a few critical ones. Custom in house applications are > often written in enterprises and upgrading can break them in non obvious ways. > Unless the new release offers something that is compelling enough to think > about, mere inertia is enough to not change anything. So far, enterprise was forced to upgrade their applications when they replace their aging hardware and the new hardware setup is not compatible with their old Apps. With Virtualization helping them, they can indefinitely postpone upgrades by maintaining the old setup even in new hardware. With this kind of inertia, even a 10 year support-cycle will not be enough for them. So why eliminate Ubuntu based on this criteria? On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:36 AM, Kumara Guru wrote: >> If the enterprise wants a 10-year locked-down deployment even for an >> Open Web Apps stack, that makes me really sad. >> I was under the impression that only proprietary, commercial products >> lock down their customers and make upgrades a costly affair. > > As a general practice, upgrades (even .xy releases) need to be > validated - be it FOSS or proprietary. Validation costs money. I am not denying that. When designing apps around an open platform, I expect costs be less than intimidating to comfortably go for periodical planned upgrades. My only contention is that a *Web application stack* -- of all things -- should be on a shorter upgrade cycle. 10 years is a ridiculously long time by Internet standards. This is especially true for customer-facing applications like an eCommerce portal. Yes, it would be highly risky to make unstable upgrades to an eCommerce portal as any Failure due to it has direct financial consequences. However, if you shy away from even making significant upgrades in reasonable time periods, your App will be a dinosaur caught in a time warp. Until like 4 years ago, cloud strategy was largely unheard of, and many enterprise Web Apps had a not-so-great design for scalability with either a huge wastage of computing resources or an abysmal resource pooling. But now, significant cost savings can be achieved with a well designed cloud strategy (Disclaimer: I am not pretending to be a expert on cloud computing -- merely stating the obvious). If your eCommerce portal had no architectural redesign for the last 5 years and will continue to be so for the next 5 years, your are pretty much limiting the number of customers you can do business with. It would be unwise not to expect a better architecture to surface in much less than a decade from now and resisting the change at that point, will actually be a financial drain. Regards, Kumaraguru ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] Fwd: [FTC] Thamizha Develoepr Workshop & Hack-a-thon - 9th October 2011
Hello Ashokan, On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Asokan Pichai wrote: > > I can offer the venue. > > We have a 20-30 classroom setups -- ubuntu -- with reasonable broadband and > leased lines. > > Great news. I think it would be more than sufficient for the hackathon. Can I mail you off the list to discuss other things like the location, travel routes etc..., Thank You for the offer. -- Regards P.Arunmozhi Twitter: @tecoholic Website: http://arunmozhi.in ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] How to know the Size of Graphic Card?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Prasanna Venkatesh wrote: > 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core > Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA > controller]) >Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device c0a5 >Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 51 > *Memory at f540 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M] >Memory at c000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]* >I/O ports at e000 [size=64] >Expansion ROM at [disabled] >Capabilities: >Kernel driver in use: i915 >Kernel modules: i915 > Do not top post. If this is the only VGA entry you have got, then I'm afraid you do *not* have a separate graphics card. This entry is for integrated controller. -- அகிலன் (Akilan R) [ blog.akilan.in ] *I should have no use for a paradise in which I should be deprived of the right to prefer hell.* --Jean Rostand ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] How to know the Size of Graphic Card?
it's shows only this 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 2nd Generation Core Processor Family Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device c0a5 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 51 *Memory at f540 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4M] Memory at c000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M]* I/O ports at e000 [size=64] Expansion ROM at [disabled] Capabilities: Kernel driver in use: i915 Kernel modules: i915 Internal memory !! i need to know the graphics memory !!! On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Akilan R wrote: > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Prasanna Venkadesh >wrote: > > > I am running Ubuntu (11.04) in my laptop and i wanted to know the Total > > Size > > of Graphic card memory and available memory. > > I have tried 'sysinfo' and 'hardinfo' but they shows only internal > Graphics > > that comes with Ram but not external graphic card. > > > > $ lspci -v > > redirect the output to some file and search for the string "VGA". > > -- > அகிலன் (Akilan R) > [ blog.akilan.in ] > *I should have no use for a paradise in which I should be deprived of the > right to prefer hell.* > --Jean Rostand > ___ > ILUGC Mailing List: > http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc > ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] How to know the Size of Graphic Card?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 7:48 PM, Prasanna Venkadesh wrote: > I am running Ubuntu (11.04) in my laptop and i wanted to know the Total > Size > of Graphic card memory and available memory. > I have tried 'sysinfo' and 'hardinfo' but they shows only internal Graphics > that comes with Ram but not external graphic card. > $ lspci -v redirect the output to some file and search for the string "VGA". -- அகிலன் (Akilan R) [ blog.akilan.in ] *I should have no use for a paradise in which I should be deprived of the right to prefer hell.* --Jean Rostand ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
[Ilugc] How to know the Size of Graphic Card?
I am running Ubuntu (11.04) in my laptop and i wanted to know the Total Size of Graphic card memory and available memory. I have tried 'sysinfo' and 'hardinfo' but they shows only internal Graphics that comes with Ram but not external graphic card. How can i know those details please suggest some solution for it -- Regards, Prasanna Venkadesh PuduvaiLUG (puduvai Linux Users Group): http://puduvailug.wordpress.com/ FOSS Jobs all over India: http://fossjobs.in ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] Windows 8 OEM Computers to lock you out of dual boot?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Arun Venkataswamy wrote: > Not want to sensationalize this development, but wanted to get some opinion > on this article... > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/09/21/062231/how-microsoft-can-lock-linux-off-windows-8-pcs > It shall come and pass (similar to TPM a few years ago). -- Arun Khan ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] Windows 8 OEM Computers to lock you out of dual boot?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 3:23 PM, 0 <0...@0throot.com> wrote: > It will help if we can keep the thread in the context of the article > instead of focusing on someone's opinions. > What makes you think that whatever I said did not match the context of this thread or article OP linked to(which is in fact a pointer -aka slashdotting - to three other articles)? Quoting from one of the linked articles "While it would be possible for various distributions to get their keys added, that wouldn't help anyone who wanted to run a tweaked version of the "approved" bootloader or kernel.", is exactly what I said. Personal attacks are frowned upon here, but ideas written in this list can and *will* be refuted. Do not take it personally. If you cannot do that then mailing list culture may not be for you. :) -- அகிலன் (Akilan R) [ blog.akilan.in ] *I should have no use for a paradise in which I should be deprived of the right to prefer hell.* --Jean Rostand ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] Windows 8 OEM Computers to lock you out of dual boot?
>> or >> provide an option to boot even if it is not signed. >> > > This introduces another option that a newbie will have to change. Which, of > course, will be named *disable secure boot*. (OMG-Ubuntu rightly summarised > newbie's reaction thus: "You want me to disable a _security feature_ so I > can boot into this Linux thing?") > > >> Worst comes to worst, it shouldn't be too difficult to patch the UEFI >> firmware or replace it with an open source firmware. >> > > Ah, another barrier to Newbie. This seems to be an idea to increase the > height of Windows-Linux jump barrier, without appearing to be fully blocking > it. I appreciate your response to my opinions but they were mere opinions on the article. It will help if we can keep the thread in the context of the article instead of focusing on someone's opinions. -- 0 ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] Windows 8 OEM Computers to lock you out of dual boot?
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:32 PM, 0 <0...@0throot.com> wrote: > As far as desktop are concerned, I am sure mobo > manufacturers will be sensible enough to sign the linux bootloaders > This will prevent us from compiling kernel ourselves. > or > provide an option to boot even if it is not signed. > This introduces another option that a newbie will have to change. Which, of course, will be named *disable secure boot*. (OMG-Ubuntu rightly summarised newbie's reaction thus: "You want me to disable a _security feature_ so I can boot into this Linux thing?") > Worst comes to worst, it shouldn't be too difficult to patch the UEFI > firmware or replace it with an open source firmware. > Ah, another barrier to Newbie. This seems to be an idea to increase the height of Windows-Linux jump barrier, without appearing to be fully blocking it. -- அகிலன் (Akilan R) [ blog.akilan.in ] *I should have no use for a paradise in which I should be deprived of the right to prefer hell.* --Jean Rostand ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
Re: [Ilugc] Windows 8 OEM Computers to lock you out of dual boot?
> Not want to sensationalize this development, but wanted to get some opinion > on this article... > http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/09/21/062231/how-microsoft-can-lock-linux-off-windows-8-pcs IMO, This will mostly affect laptops since its not easy to build one and its tied to a vendor. As far as desktop are concerned, I am sure mobo manufacturers will be sensible enough to sign the linux bootloaders or provide an option to boot even if it is not signed. Worst comes to worst, it shouldn't be too difficult to patch the UEFI firmware or replace it with an open source firmware. IMHO, This is a monetization strategy which will introduce new trusted CAs, who can make even more money. -- 0 ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
[Ilugc] Windows 8 OEM Computers to lock you out of dual boot?
Not want to sensationalize this development, but wanted to get some opinion on this article... http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/09/21/062231/how-microsoft-can-lock-linux-off-windows-8-pcs Regards, Arun ___ ILUGC Mailing List: http://www.ae.iitm.ac.in/mailman/listinfo/ilugc
