Re: [ilugd] Forums
Hello Vivek, I didn't knew that this is the attempt no 4. However, I would love to make it a success. By now 3 LUG-D members have registered there, i would love to see you all there. Regards, Nitin Gupta CEO Xaprio Solutions http://www.xaprio.com/ http://www.xaprio.com/forums/ --- vivek khurana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- nitin gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > This is Nitin Gupta, some of you might know me. > > I am a silent member of this prestigious Linux > Users > > Group from quiet a long time. I completely shifted > > to > > linux on january and one of the biggest fans of > > linux. > > I thaught of doing something for Linux and LUG-D, > > but > > was not getting, that how i can be of some help to > > it. > > Finally i got the idea of launching Forums for > Linux > > and LUG-D. I know thats not too much, but yeah, if > > we > > guys can work together using that forum as central > > point, we can definitely do something for this > > comunity and AlMighty Linux. > > Some of you might think that i am doing it for > Repo > > or > > hits on my website, but its not that. > > I hope you guys would have a look at > > http://www.xaprio.com/forums/ and would spend some > > of > > your expensive time to register there and to help > it > > become a success. > > I am always open for suggestions. > > I hope that most of you reading it would register > in > > the forums. > > > And this will atempt number four in past one year > to > launch a forum for ilugd > > > regards > VK > > > I have studied in an university called life > > > > Disclaimer > The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the > opinions to me. The distinction is yours to draw... > > > > __ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced > search. > http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 > > ___ > ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org > http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd > Archives at: > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi > http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/ > __ Discover Yahoo! Use Yahoo! to plan a weekend, have fun online and more. Check it out! http://discover.yahoo.com/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Forums
--- nitin gupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > This is Nitin Gupta, some of you might know me. > I am a silent member of this prestigious Linux Users > Group from quiet a long time. I completely shifted > to > linux on january and one of the biggest fans of > linux. > I thaught of doing something for Linux and LUG-D, > but > was not getting, that how i can be of some help to > it. > Finally i got the idea of launching Forums for Linux > and LUG-D. I know thats not too much, but yeah, if > we > guys can work together using that forum as central > point, we can definitely do something for this > comunity and AlMighty Linux. > Some of you might think that i am doing it for Repo > or > hits on my website, but its not that. > I hope you guys would have a look at > http://www.xaprio.com/forums/ and would spend some > of > your expensive time to register there and to help it > become a success. > I am always open for suggestions. > I hope that most of you reading it would register in > the forums. And this will atempt number four in past one year to launch a forum for ilugd regards VK I have studied in an university called life Disclaimer The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The distinction is yours to draw... __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250 ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] [ GLSA 200507-05 ] zlib: Buffer overflow
[Please upgrade zlib on all distributions -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1204111058==" Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Thierry Carrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gentoo-announce@lists.gentoo.org Cc: full-disclosure@lists.grok.org.uk, bugtraq@securityfocus.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Full-disclosure] [ GLSA 200507-05 ] zlib: Buffer overflow Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2005 16:23:20 +0200 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --===1204111058== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="enigCDBAA32FB4088BBAF51FDC24" This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --enigCDBAA32FB4088BBAF51FDC24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Gentoo Linux Security Advisory GLSA 200507-05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - http://security.gentoo.org/ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Severity: High Title: zlib: Buffer overflow Date: July 06, 2005 Bugs: #98121 ID: 200507-05 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Synopsis A buffer overflow has been discovered in zlib, potentially resulting in the execution of arbitrary code. Background == zlib is a widely used free and patent unencumbered data compression library. Affected packages = --- Package/ Vulnerable /Unaffected --- 1 sys-libs/zlib < 1.2.2-r1 >= 1.2.2-r1 Description === Tavis Ormandy of the Gentoo Linux Security Audit Team discovered a buffer overflow in zlib. A bounds checking operation failed to take invalid data into account, allowing a specifically malformed deflate data stream to overrun a buffer. Impact == An attacker could construct a malformed data stream, embedding it within network communication or an application file format, potentially resulting in the execution of arbitrary code when decoded by the application using the zlib library. Workaround == There is no known workaround at this time. Resolution == All zlib users should upgrade to the latest version: # emerge --sync # emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=sys-libs/zlib-1.2.2-r1" References == [ 1 ] CAN-2005-2096 http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2096 Availability This GLSA and any updates to it are available for viewing at the Gentoo Security Website: http://security.gentoo.org/glsa/glsa-200507-05.xml Concerns? = Security is a primary focus of Gentoo Linux and ensuring the confidentiality and security of our users machines is of utmost importance to us. Any security concerns should be addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or alternatively, you may file a bug at http://bugs.gentoo.org. License === Copyright 2005 Gentoo Foundation, Inc; referenced text belongs to its owner(s). The contents of this document are licensed under the Creative Commons - Attribution / Share Alike license. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0 --enigCDBAA32FB4088BBAF51FDC24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCy+lcvcL1obalX08RApjsAJ4/0Xq9PbtEl2JIxBbEd85PCW4F0ACfcneI BkhYNLyEheFSmHoaV2Kbxxk= =pBW5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --enigCDBAA32FB4088BBAF51FDC24-- --===1204111058== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline ___ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.grok.org.uk/full-disclosure-charter.html Hosted and sponsored by Secunia - http://secunia.com/ --===1204111058==-- -- End of this Digest ** -- Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kandalaya.org/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F It is the mind that moves ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.del
[ilugd] Forums
Hello, This is Nitin Gupta, some of you might know me. I am a silent member of this prestigious Linux Users Group from quiet a long time. I completely shifted to linux on january and one of the biggest fans of linux. I thaught of doing something for Linux and LUG-D, but was not getting, that how i can be of some help to it. Finally i got the idea of launching Forums for Linux and LUG-D. I know thats not too much, but yeah, if we guys can work together using that forum as central point, we can definitely do something for this comunity and AlMighty Linux. Some of you might think that i am doing it for Repo or hits on my website, but its not that. I hope you guys would have a look at http://www.xaprio.com/forums/ and would spend some of your expensive time to register there and to help it become a success. I am always open for suggestions. I hope that most of you reading it would register in the forums. Regards, Nitin Gupta CEO Xaprio Solutions http://www.xaprio.com/ http://www.xaprio.com/forums/ +919818271971 [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do you Yahoo!? Make Yahoo! your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] ESR says "GPL should be dead"
Eric S. Raymond (ESR) is harping about the community not really needing GPL any more. Complete interview at: http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/06/30/esr_interview.html?page=last&x-showcontent=text What do others think? Especially people who work in companies dealing with open source products? Or people whose companies are evaluating deploying Linux based solutions? Does GPL do more harm than what it tries to protect? Nandz. -- http://nandz.blogspot.com ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
vivek khurana wrote: > >>I think certain trademark and other contractual >>obligations also ensure >>that you cannot even copy a RHEL distribution for >>your own use(not just >>redistribution). In other words, you can only >>install RHEL on the number >>of machines you have licence for. > > > As far as i am told by redhat executives, if you > install redhat on more machines than you have licence > for; redhat will support only those machines which > have licence. That means extra machines will not be > supported by redhat. > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/06/30/esr_interview.html?page=last&x-showcontent=text [...] [Q] But Red Hat doesn't release all of its software as open source. [ESR] I believe they make their real money on a product (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) that is completely GPLed. If you know differently, can you tell me what other licenses they are using? [Q] It seems that Red Hat is selling its GNU/Linux distribution under a sort of user license that limits the freedom No. 2 provided by the GPL. The short version of the story, as I was told, is that if I buy a CD/DVD with the last Red Hat version and I make an ISO from that and put that online, I'll get sued. The same thing happens with computer magazines. They cannot include any Red Hat CD because the term Red Hat is a trademark or something like that, and they don't let the magazine use it without permission. And obviously they don't give you that permission. Magazines must use Fedora and never say Red Hat. [ESR] Excuse me while I fire up a browser and research this a bit... Ahhh... right, if you republish a RHEL CD in either form, you could get sued for illegal use of the embedded trademarks. I think I just found the user license in question. So the answer to your question is yes... Red Hat is a demonstration that you can have a profitable business based on entirely GPL code. You may have to play some interesting tricks with trademark law to do it, though. As I understand it now, what Red Hat has done is legally blocked republication of its entire RHEL distribution even though any component part is still GPLed and therefore freely redistributable. Damn, that's clever and sneaky. I like it. It serves everybody: Red Hat gets a fence around its product, but all the community objectives of open source licensing are still met. [Q] Do you consider this behavior coherent? [ESR] Yes. It makes logical and even ethical sense. [Q] Isn't one of the community objectives of open source licensing the possibility to share the code? So how can the fact that every single piece is still under GPL and thus redistributable, but if I take the whole CD/ISO it will be covered by the US trademark laws, be acceptable? [ESR] That's the beauty of it. The possibility of sharing the code is unaffected--what you can't "share" is Red Hat's integration work and branding. -- Sandip Bhattacharya *Puroga Technologies * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: http://www.puroga.com * Home/Blog: http://www.sandipb.net/blog PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
--- Sandip Bhattacharya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I think certain trademark and other contractual > obligations also ensure > that you cannot even copy a RHEL distribution for > your own use(not just > redistribution). In other words, you can only > install RHEL on the number > of machines you have licence for. As far as i am told by redhat executives, if you install redhat on more machines than you have licence for; redhat will support only those machines which have licence. That means extra machines will not be supported by redhat. regards VK I have studied in an university called life Disclaimer The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The distinction is yours to draw... Sell on Yahoo! Auctions no fees. Bid on great items. http://auctions.yahoo.com/ ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
> While individual packages can be freely copied, the total distribution > is supposed to be under a separate independent compilation effort, which > Redhat is restricting to paid customers. Which I think is a fair deal. Redhat can retain its revenue sources but doesn't end up compromising the open nature of its software. People can still look into the hood and tinker with individual parts of the entire system but can't earn off Redhat's efforts. Nandz. -- http://nandz.blogspot.com ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
Saurabh Nanda wrote: >>Does anyone know if what they are doing is legal or not ? > > > I don't know the exact licensing agreement for SuSE Linux, but Redhat > has something like this: > > All their work (or almost all) is GPLed. That means you get the four > freedoms on the code. BUT the trademarks and logos are not freely > distributable. The extract from RHL 9's EULA sums it up - > > "THE "RED HAT" TRADEMARK, THE "BLUECURVE" TRADEMARK AND RED HAT'S > SHADOW MAN LOGO ARE REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF RED HAT, INC. IN THE > UNITED STATES AND OTHER COUNTRIES. WHILE THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ALLOWS > YOU TO COPY, MODIFY AND DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE, IT DOES NOT PERMIT > YOU TO DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE UTILIZING RED HAT'S TRADEMARKS." > > So, you may copy the entire CD and redistribute it but you can't call > it a Redhat product. You have to remove all Redhat logos and > trademarks before redistribtuion. This effectively nullifies any brand > equity that you might get from redistributing a 'Redhat product' per > se. I think certain trademark and other contractual obligations also ensure that you cannot even copy a RHEL distribution for your own use(not just redistribution). In other words, you can only install RHEL on the number of machines you have licence for. While individual packages can be freely copied, the total distribution is supposed to be under a separate independent compilation effort, which Redhat is restricting to paid customers. - Sandip -- Sandip Bhattacharya *Puroga Technologies * [EMAIL PROTECTED] Work: http://www.puroga.com * Home/Blog: http://www.sandipb.net/blog PGP/GPG Signature: 51A4 6C57 4BC6 8C82 6A65 AE78 B1A1 2280 A129 0FF3 ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
On 7/6/05, Saurabh Nanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "THE "RED HAT" TRADEMARK, THE "BLUECURVE" TRADEMARK AND RED HAT'S > SHADOW MAN LOGO ARE REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF RED HAT, INC. IN THE > UNITED STATES AND OTHER COUNTRIES. WHILE THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ALLOWS > YOU TO COPY, MODIFY AND DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE, IT DOES NOT PERMIT > YOU TO DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE UTILIZING RED HAT'S TRADEMARKS." Agreed... Infact, SuSE also follows a similar policy. According to SuSE's EULA (found on the cd), you can toss around SuSE cd's in your office, but cannot sell it! -- regards, makuchaku --- http://makuchaku.modblog.com When you speak out with the courage of your convictions, people listen! -- Valmik Thapar, Wildlife Conservationist. ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
> Does anyone know if what they are doing is legal or not ? I don't know the exact licensing agreement for SuSE Linux, but Redhat has something like this: All their work (or almost all) is GPLed. That means you get the four freedoms on the code. BUT the trademarks and logos are not freely distributable. The extract from RHL 9's EULA sums it up - "THE "RED HAT" TRADEMARK, THE "BLUECURVE" TRADEMARK AND RED HAT'S SHADOW MAN LOGO ARE REGISTERED TRADEMARKS OF RED HAT, INC. IN THE UNITED STATES AND OTHER COUNTRIES. WHILE THIS LICENSE AGREEMENT ALLOWS YOU TO COPY, MODIFY AND DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE, IT DOES NOT PERMIT YOU TO DISTRIBUTE THE SOFTWARE UTILIZING RED HAT'S TRADEMARKS." So, you may copy the entire CD and redistribute it but you can't call it a Redhat product. You have to remove all Redhat logos and trademarks before redistribtuion. This effectively nullifies any brand equity that you might get from redistributing a 'Redhat product' per se. I hope I've made this subtle point clear. Nandz. -- http://nandz.blogspot.com ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Linux redistribution legality
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Someone brought to my notice that i could "BUY" most of the Linux distros on a per CD basis from http://www.roseindia.net . Their list even includes stuff like SuSE Professional and Mandrake Power Pack which i know are not distributable and need to be purchased for a tidy sum. Does anyone know if what they are doing is legal or not ? - - Ankur. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCy45obR7mO5apBYARAgaQAKD+uGDLTIJ5QGJiFQ9dJikl7IaRmACgla1r fbsgw/PjdfueH35WZJ7elNA= =TCPb -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
Re: [ilugd] modprobe bttv problem - Mandrake 10.1
>After issuing command modprobe bttv and running xawtv, neither any channel is >displayed nor any sound out comes. But from root when I issue the command as >follows then everything is fine : > > > > Seems like ownership issue on /dev/ filesystem Change permission according to your requirements on /dev/video* devices > >rmmod bttv >modprobe bttv card=23 > >please guide where the problem can be. > >Thanks in advance > > >MALKIAT > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > HTH supreet ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
[ilugd] Invitation to linux geeks, July 17, at National Association for the Blind
Imagine a world where writing and the printing press had not been invented. Except for a few braille publications, and volunteers willing to record audio books, that is the world most blind people live in. The lucky ones are those with access to a computer, for they have recently become privy to any text in electronic form. Imagine how exciting it must be, to suddenly get almost equal access to the written word. If you are an English speaker, that is. Many blind persons are professional typists. With typewriters, they had to be extra careful not to make any mistakes. The computer gives them the backspace key, and all the benefits of a word processor. If you type English, that is. The blind rely on a neat little “screen reader” software called Jaws, that costs $900, and keeps speaking to the user, reading out what is on the screen, providing her with all the information she needs to decide what key to press next. It does not handle Indian languages. So, if you are a blind Hindi typist, and your office switches from typewriters to computers, you lose your job. Under Linux, there is also a screen reader available, called Gnopernicus. Work is going on to attach Indian-language text to speech to it. With a little extra effort, the whole range of Linux software can, through Gnopernicus, become accessible to the blind. Computers are rapidly becoming affordable to the blind, considering the benefit they provide. A little effort by Linux geeks, to help the transition of blind users to Linux, will dramatically increase the number of Linux users in years to come. Additionally, this effort will benefit a far wider community, you and me included. Those of us who can speak a language but not read the script, are in the same position as the blind with regard to any written material in that language. When driving, or engaged in activities that demand the attention of our eyes, we are effectively blind from the point of view of the computer that is trying to navigate us, or to display a text message on a tiny screen. Thus, software for the blind is very useful for sighted persons as well, particularly in a country such as India, where we have over a dozen scripts, and illiteracy is high. There is therefore a huge professional opportunity here for developers and deployers of computer technology. With a view to opening the eyes of geeks to such opportunities, on Sunday, July 17, 2005, the National Association of the Blind, RK Puram, would like to invite the Delhi Linux users group to a gettogether. The tentative agenda is as follows: Dr. Dipendra Manocha will provide an introduction to the work being done at the technology center. In particular, he will talk about Daisy, www.daisy.org, a standard and system for content production, that effectively marries text with audio, so that users have the pleasure of listening to quality audio, while retaining the benefits of text, such as the ability to use search facilities, and to edit efficiently. This is a very interesting area with many opportunities for software development. Students and faculty of the NAB will then demonstrate their use of diverse software packages. This part of the event will hopefully irritate our guests, for almost all they will see is software running on the MS Windows platform. This segment will show them, however, how useful computers can be in the lives of the “print challenged,” and provide them the incentive to make equivalent software work for the blind on the Linux platform, which we have not very successfully been trying to do at the NAB. Arun Mehta will then make a presentation on Technology, Abilities and Disabilities, the outline can be found and commented on at http://www.india-gii.org/wiki/index.php/Presentations/ITandDisability We will then have a general discussion, with a view to identifying projects that are interesting to work on, for which funding may be available, and have applications for both the sighted and the blind. All are cordially invited. Our first project will be a simple eBook reader, http://www.india-gii.org/wiki/index.php/Projects/mobile_eBook_reader . Thanks to Dipendra Manocha for detailing the specifications as soon as we asked him for an idea! This reader could grow into a full-fledged Daisy editor, which is described at http://www.india-gii.org/wiki/index.php/Projects/mobile_Daisy_creator If you would like to help, but cannot come, here is a list of what we would like to learn in Java: http://www.india-gii.org/wiki/index.php/Java_wish_list -- your suggestions on appropriate courseware would be terrific. Arun -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.9/42 - Release Date: 7/6/2005 ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.li
