[ilugd] GSoC GNU project

2008-03-16 Thread Nagarjuna G.
GNU is participating again in the GSoC project.  we encourage free
software hackers to consider contributing and spending this summer
mentoring or joining this event this summer.

project ideas are listed at: http://www.gnu.org/software/soc-projects/ideas.html

-- 
Nagarjuna G.
http://www.gnowledge.org/

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] [LONG] [RANT] Ubuntu and Quality Control

2008-03-16 Thread justintmoore22
Raj,

Why are you using Ubuntu for production servers? Look how many major 
releases they have had vs. Debian, or RHEL. They push out the latest 
version of the software as fast as possible because that is what their 
user base wants. That's why I use Ubuntu on my desktops. But they can't 
possibly keep the same quality control on such a release cyle. For 
production servers I use Debian, except when a client requires 
enterprise support, then I use RHEL. I suggest the same.

Hope this helps.

Justin

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 12:55 am, Raj Mathur wrote:
 First thing yesterday morning: urgent IM message from Suresh
 Ramasubramanian (hoster of this mailing list):

   Mailman is down, can you help?

 OK, so we start investigating his box.  He has upgraded Python2.4 to
 Python2.5, and applied a Mailman security patch package.  However,
 whenever we try to access the page, the server barfs.  On to server
 logs -- syntax error in one of the Mailman support files.

 Right, I can understand an upgrade causing logical errors, but a SYNTAX
 ERROR!??!?  Nah, I must be missing something, so I look all over the 2
 upgrades.  Switch back to Python2.4 from Python2.5, no joy.  Recompile
 all the Mailman files from scratch, no joy.  Recompile the Ubuntu
 Mailman package from source and reinstall it, no joy.  Bang head
 against wall, no joy.

 Finally, desperate, I start comparing Mailman files on Suresh' server
 against Mailman installed on other servers.  While they are different
 versions of Mailman, I do notice one anomaly: where one file has:

 mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr(
 val, mlist.preferred_language) - *** Note this line 
 ***
 elif property == 'info':

 Suresh' server has:

 mlist.subject_prefix = Utils.canonstr(
 elif property == 'info':

 Saying, `no, no, it can't be!' I insert the missing line into the file
 on the broken machine, cross fingers, eyes, legs, etc and restart
 Mailman.

 It works!

 [Shift to today]

 Ubuntu issues a security notice that says, in effect, ``We screwed up
 with the previous Mailman patch, so here's the latest and greatest
 version of Mailman, and this one really, Really, REALLY works!  Believe
 us!''.

 I don't believe them.  In the past 6 months Ubuntu has issues 80 new
 security advisories.  For those 80 advisories, they have issued no less
 than SEVEN regressions (a regression is a patch to fix a broken patch).
 A near-10% regression rate sends only one message to me -- we can't be
 bothered with doing any quality control before we release packages.

 Before Ubuntu came onto the scene, I didn't even /know/ what a
 regression was.   Today it's a common word in my lexicon, because of
 Ubuntu's pathetic testing and quality control process (or lack of
 process, more likely).  An operating system vendor who issues a package
 with a syntax error (so that the package doesn't even start up, leave
 alone do something wrong), is a pure crap snake oil vendor in my book.

 So, the question: will I trust Ubuntu on an Internet-connected system?
 Nah.

 Will I trust Ubuntu on a server?  Er, please excuse me while I 
 finishing
 laughing hysterically!

 Use Debian or CentOS or any of those reasonably tested other
 distributions for your boxes, and when someone asks you to use Ubuntu,
 in the immortal words of Fancy Raygun, ``Just Say No!''.

 Regards,

 -- Raju
 --
 Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://kandalaya.org/
  Freedom in Technology  Software || February 2008 || http://freed.in/
GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
 PsyTrance  Chill: http://schizoid.in/   ||   It is the mind that moves

 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] [LIG] [LONG] [RANT] Ubuntu and Quality Control

2008-03-16 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Raj is not. I am - on a personal server that happens to host the ilugd list.
Choice of distro mostly due to the guy who did a remote hands install for my
box having only one current distro handy that had a usable version of the
tg3 gigabit ethernet driver.

And yes, aware of this, I tend to follow a install a restricted set of
packages and patch only when absolutely necessary policy that, eoe this
little contretemps with a broken mailman, has, knock on wood, worked fine so
far.

srs

 
 Why are you using Ubuntu for production servers? Look how many major
 releases they have had vs. Debian, or RHEL. They push out the latest
 version of the software as fast as possible because that is what their
 user base wants. That's why I use Ubuntu on my desktops. But they can't
 possibly keep the same quality control on such a release cyle. For
 production servers I use Debian, except when a client requires
 enterprise support, then I use RHEL. I suggest the same.
 




___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] [LIG] [LONG] [RANT] Ubuntu and Quality Control

2008-03-16 Thread Raj Mathur
On Sunday 16 Mar 2008, Justin Moore wrote:
 Why are you using Ubuntu for production servers? Look how many major
 releases they have had vs. Debian, or RHEL. They push out the latest
 version of the software as fast as possible because that is what
 their user base wants. That's why I use Ubuntu on my desktops. But
 they can't possibly keep the same quality control on such a release
 cyle. For production servers I use Debian, except when a client
 requires enterprise support, then I use RHEL. I suggest the same.

It's possible that Ubuntu isn't meant to be a server distribution (but 
in that case they shouldn't have a Ubuntu server version).  Regardless, 
it is completely irresponsible to make a package available for download 
that did not get even one command's worth of testing after packaging.

A simple

  /etc/init.d/mailman restart

after installing the new package would have shown that mailman wasn't 
working.  Please note that this is not some error condition that only 
surfaces under some weird combination of environments or events.  
Whatever your hardware or software configuration, whatever applications 
you are running, whatever network connectivity (or lack) you have, 
merely starting up the newly-installed mailman would have failed.  
Whether desktop or server, a distribution that permits the release of 
an Internet-service package without even that one, basic command is 
broken beyond repair IMNSHO.

Ubuntu needs to make a package testing and release policy real quick.  
The next time it could be a security patch to Firefox that gets messed 
up, and then we'll have millions of cracked Ubuntu systems merrily 
spamming away.  Before something like that happens, it would be better 
if Ubuntu just withdrew gracefully from the list of Linux 
distributions.

Regards,

-- Raju
-- 
Raj Mathur[EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://kandalaya.org/
 Freedom in Technology  Software || February 2008 || http://freed.in/
   GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
PsyTrance  Chill: http://schizoid.in/   ||   It is the mind that moves

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


[ilugd] reg: RHCE exam

2008-03-16 Thread Lukram Debendro
Hi,

Could anyone of you, please give some tips on RHCE examination.

My exam is on 24th March'08

Thanks  regards
Debendro Lukram
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] reg: RHCE exam

2008-03-16 Thread Karanbir Singh
Lukram Debendro wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Could anyone of you, please give some tips on RHCE examination.

Study for them :D and make sure you practise as much hands on stuff as
you can.

 
 My exam is on 24th March'08

best of luck for the exams.

-- 
Karanbir Singh : http://www.karan.org/ : [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] [LONG] [RANT] Ubuntu and Quality Control

2008-03-16 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves

On 16-Mar-08, at 7:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Why are you using Ubuntu for production servers? Look how many major
 releases they have had vs. Debian, or RHEL. They push out the latest
 version of the software as fast as possible because that is what their
 user base wants. That's why I use Ubuntu on my desktops. But they  
 can't
 possibly keep the same quality control on such a release cyle. For
 production servers I use Debian, except when a client requires
 enterprise support, then I use RHEL. I suggest the same.

for production servers:

rule 1: never use the latest
rule 2: never use the latest
rule 3: never use the latest

and if you *do* break this rule, suffer the consequences in silence


-- 
regards

Kenneth Gonsalves
Associate, NRC-FOSS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://nrcfosshelpline.in/code/





___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Next Event: http://freed.in - February 22-24, 2008
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/