[ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread Linux Lingam
dear all,

am hugely dismayed to note that a company that obviously understands foss,
adn cleverly uses foss tools to its advantage,
spreads the fud about foss by calling it freeware.
here they are calilng 'audacity' freeware, among several dozen examples i found:


http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/audio/index3.html

that's like calling an apple, a pineapple.

regards
niyam
-- 
niyam bhushan

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread Abhishek Nandakumar
The description does say free, open source. Freeware is in reference  
to price.


On 26-Mar-09, at 11:57 PM, Linux Lingam wrote:


dear all,

am hugely dismayed to note that a company that obviously understands  
foss,

adn cleverly uses foss tools to its advantage,
spreads the fud about foss by calling it freeware.
here they are calilng 'audacity' freeware, among several dozen  
examples i found:



http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/audio/index3.html

that's like calling an apple, a pineapple.

regards
niyam
--
niyam bhushan

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


--
Abhishek Nandakumar
http://xabhishek.com





___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread Chetan Thapliyal
There are other applications also (not mentioned as open source) that 
have been listed as freeware. So what's the point if some open source 
application has been mentioned as freeware?


Abhishek Nandakumar wrote:
The description does say free, open source. Freeware is in reference 
to price.


On 26-Mar-09, at 11:57 PM, Linux Lingam wrote:


dear all,

am hugely dismayed to note that a company that obviously understands 
foss,

adn cleverly uses foss tools to its advantage,
spreads the fud about foss by calling it freeware.
here they are calilng 'audacity' freeware, among several dozen 
examples i found:



http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/audio/index3.html

that's like calling an apple, a pineapple.

regards
niyam
--
niyam bhushan

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


--
Abhishek Nandakumar
http://xabhishek.com





___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/





___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread Abhishek Nandakumar
Freeware must not be confused with FOSS. Freeware simply means - does  
not require payment for use. Which is the case for Audacity.


On 27-Mar-09, at 1:53 AM, Chetan Thapliyal wrote:

There are other applications also (not mentioned as open source)  
that have been listed as freeware. So what's the point if some open  
source application has been mentioned as freeware?


--
Abhishek Nandakumar
http://xabhishek.com




___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread ­Honey ­Singh
 On 27-Mar-09, at 1:53 AM, Chetan Thapliyal wrote:

  There are other applications also (not mentioned as open source) that have
 been listed as freeware. So what's the point if some open source application
 has been mentioned as freeware?

 In simple words an open source application can be a freeware but a freeware
application/software can't be an open source.

 Abhishek Nandakumar cont...@xabhishek.com wrote:
 Freeware must not be confused with FOSS. Freeware simply means - does not
 require payment for use. Which is the case for Audacity.


  --
Regards
Honey Singh

# Web: http://www.mediaredefined.com
# Blog: http://www.honeytechblog.com
# Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/honeytech
# LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/in/honeytech
# Phone: +91.9911396858
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread Smruti
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, ­Honey ­Singh honeyt...@gmail.com wrote:

 In simple words an open source application can be a freeware but a freeware
 application/software can't be an open source.


I guess you meant May by Can and May not by Can't.

By the way...just curious...after so many years...why are we still confused
with the very definitions we stand to fight for here.

-- 
Smruti
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread ­Honey ­Singh
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Smruti smrutiman...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 1:59 PM, ­Honey ­Singh honeyt...@gmail.com
 wrote:

  In simple words an open source application can be a freeware but a
 freeware
  application/software can't be an open source.


 I guess you meant May by Can and May not by Can't.

Yeah,you mean in right way. :P



 By the way...just curious...after so many years...why are we still confused
 with the very definitions we stand to fight for here.

--
 Smruti

-- 
Honey Singh
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] apple FUD on freeware vs foss

2009-03-26 Thread Kartik Mistry
On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 12:30 AM,  Linux Lingam wrote:
 http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/audio/index3.html

Same for many sites! I wrote an email to apple. Obviously, no reply!

-- 
 Cheers,
 Kartik Mistry | 0xD1028C8D | IRC: kart_
 Debian GNU/Linux Developer
 Blog.en: ftbfs.wordpress.com
 Blog.gu: kartikm.wordpress.com

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/