[ilugd] Fisicalab

2009-04-12 Thread Mani A
FísicaLab is an educational application to solve physics problems. Is
made with GNUstep and use the GSL libraries (GNU Scientific Library).
The problems are setting adding elements from the palette to
chalkboard, and writing the data of each element. The elements are
objects as Blocks, Pulleys, Mobiles, Forces, ... . Use the SI and
English systems, scientific notation and many conversion factors. The
problems that can be solved with FísicaLab 0.1, are:

Kinematics of particles (doesn't include circular motion).
Statics of particles in 2D.
Dynamic of particles in 2D (doesn't include dynamic of circular motion).
The static and dynamic problems are entered constructing the free body
diagrams of the objects. Although FísicaLab is easy and intuitive, we
recommend you read the help files first before set any problem. You
can access these files in the option menu Info - Help.

License: GPL 3

http://www.nongnu.org/fisicalab/
__

Best

A. Mani



-- 
A. Mani
Member, Cal. Math. Soc

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] PDF Urdu font problem

2009-04-12 Thread Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org wrote:
 On Friday 10 Apr 2009, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org
 wrote:
  The characters are all here, because if you select and copy the PDF
  text (e.g. in Kpdf) and paste it into an editor it displays the
  complete Urdu text beautifully.

 If you use the same font to write something in a standard editor/word
 processor and output it to PDF, does it render b0rked or as_expected?

 Interesting diagnostic!  Yes, if I paste the text from the PDF into OOo
 writer, convert all to Nafees font and generate a fresh PDF it looks
 just fine.

Umm.. I was looking at whether - if you use a new OOo writer document
and, with the same font selected input randomly using appropriate
layout whether it gets rendered.

 Maybe I should get Joomla to just use OOo to generate PDFs from pages
 (j/k :)

Well, on the face of it, turns out that Joomla seems to be pushing out
a PDF that does not seem to render alright. Might be worth poking at
the internals to see how Joomla does generate the PDF. And, the
original post would be a good puzzle on indlinux list :)

-- 

http://www.gutenberg.net - Fine literature digitally re-published
http://www.plos.org - Public Library of Science
http://www.creativecommons.org - Flexible copyright for creative work
Sent from Mumbai, MH, India

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] PDF Urdu font problem

2009-04-12 Thread Raj Mathur
On Monday 13 Apr 2009, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org 
wrote:
  On Friday 10 Apr 2009, Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
  On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Raj Mathur r...@linux-delhi.org
 
  wrote:
   The characters are all here, because if you select and copy the
   PDF text (e.g. in Kpdf) and paste it into an editor it displays
   the complete Urdu text beautifully.
 
  If you use the same font to write something in a standard
  editor/word processor and output it to PDF, does it render b0rked
  or as_expected?
 
  Interesting diagnostic!  Yes, if I paste the text from the PDF into
  OOo writer, convert all to Nafees font and generate a fresh PDF it
  looks just fine.

 Umm.. I was looking at whether - if you use a new OOo writer document
 and, with the same font selected input randomly using appropriate
 layout whether it gets rendered.

That works out of the box anyway.

  Maybe I should get Joomla to just use OOo to generate PDFs from
  pages (j/k :)

 Well, on the face of it, turns out that Joomla seems to be pushing
 out a PDF that does not seem to render alright. Might be worth poking
 at the internals to see how Joomla does generate the PDF. And, the
 original post would be a good puzzle on indlinux list :)

Joomla uses a library called TCPDF, whose author I'm in communication 
with.  Unfortunately TCPDF requires the fonts to be in some special 
format, for which tools are provided along with the library itself.  
I'd used the tools and instructions for converting NafeesWebNaskh (the 
font I'm using) into TCPDF-compatible form, and that's what seems to be 
b0rk.

I can use the Arabic font that ships with TCPDF for generating PDFs, 
which look fine but also have characters missing (not as many missing 
as with NafeesWebNaskh though).

Regards,

-- Raju
-- 
Raj Mathurr...@kandalaya.org  http://kandalaya.org/
   GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5  0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F
PsyTrance  Chill: http://schizoid.in/   ||   It is the mind that moves

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/