Re: [ilugd] How to increase /root partition size in Ubun tu 8.04

2009-05-20 Thread Neha Sharma
Hi
I have a system which was dual boot and had the following configuration

/dev/sda1 NTFS
/dev/sda2 NTFS
/dev/sda3 linux
/dev/sda4 extended
/dev/sda5 lvm

The filesystem got crashed, now i am trying to recover it without corrupting
windows partition.
I booted the system in rescue mode and mounted the linux filesystem which
was on lvm in the following way...

bash$ mkdir /new
bash$ mount /dev/mapper/VG00/LogVol00 /new
bash$ reboot

then it came to the grub prompt

grub>

??

now I am not able to understand what to do


Plaese help me with the lvm concepts, so that I can understand and
resolve  the problem.





On 5/20/09, Ramkumar R  wrote:
>
> > Do you recommend putting / on a LVM device?
>
> No. The LVM partitions I maintain are:
> /home
> /home/music
> /home/video
> /usr
> /usr/local
> /tmp
> /var
> /root
> (swap)
>
> No, /boot should not be on LVM.
>
>  and that is the catch.  /boot in most installations is not on a separate
>  partition.
>
> I personally hate auto-partitioning things (well, for that matter even
> auto-installing things). Don't bother with them... even if you want
> to, I'm sure most of these CD installers come with manual partitioning
> options.
>
>  I had that for a couple of years and it was more trouble than it was
>  worth.  Primary issue is with the default initrd generated when a new
>  kernel is installed -- had to do all sorts of obscure initrd
>  configurations to make sure it booted up fine on an LVM.
>
> I've been using LVM for over four years now and it works perfectly. I
> can add and remove physical hard drives whenever I want without
> worrying about repartitioning.
>
> HTH.
>
> ___
> ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane. 
> user-groups.linux.delhi<http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
>



On 5/20/09, Neha Sharma  wrote:
>
> Hi
> I have a system which was dual boot and had the following configuration
>
> /dev/sda1 NTFS
> /dev/sda2 NTFS
> /dev/sda3 linux
> /dev/sda4 extended
> /dev/sda5 lvm
>
> The filesystem got crashed, now i am trying to recover it without
> corrupting windows partition.
> I booted the system in rescue mode and mounted the linux filesystem which
> was on lvm in the following way...
>
> bash$ mkdir /new
> bash$ mount /dev/mapper/VG00/LogVol00
>
> Plaese help me with the lvm concepts, so that I can understand and
> resolve  the problem.
>
>
>
>
>
> On 5/20/09, Ramkumar R  wrote:
>>
>> > Do you recommend putting / on a LVM device?
>>
>> No. The LVM partitions I maintain are:
>> /home
>> /home/music
>> /home/video
>> /usr
>> /usr/local
>> /tmp
>> /var
>> /root
>> (swap)
>>
>> No, /boot should not be on LVM.
>>
>> > and that is the catch.  /boot in most installations is not on a separate
>> > partition.
>>
>> I personally hate auto-partitioning things (well, for that matter even
>> auto-installing things). Don't bother with them... even if you want
>> to, I'm sure most of these CD installers come with manual partitioning
>> options.
>>
>> > I had that for a couple of years and it was more trouble than it was
>> > worth.  Primary issue is with the default initrd generated when a new
>> > kernel is installed -- had to do all sorts of obscure initrd
>> > configurations to make sure it booted up fine on an LVM.
>>
>> I've been using LVM for over four years now and it works perfectly. I
>> can add and remove physical hard drives whenever I want without
>> worrying about repartitioning.
>>
>> HTH.
>>
>> ___
>> ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
>> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
>> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
>>
>
>
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] How to increase /root partition size in Ubun tu 8.04

2009-05-20 Thread Neha Sharma
Hi
I have a system which was dual boot and had the following configuration

/dev/sda1 NTFS
/dev/sda2 NTFS
/dev/sda3 linux
/dev/sda4 extended
/dev/sda5 lvm

The filesystem got crashed, now i am trying to recover it without corrupting
windows partition.
I booted the system in rescue mode and mounted the linux filesystem which
was on lvm in the following way...

bash$ mkdir /new
bash$ mount /dev/mapper/VG00/LogVol00

Plaese help me with the lvm concepts, so that I can understand and
resolve  the problem.





On 5/20/09, Ramkumar R  wrote:
>
> > Do you recommend putting / on a LVM device?
>
> No. The LVM partitions I maintain are:
> /home
> /home/music
> /home/video
> /usr
> /usr/local
> /tmp
> /var
> /root
> (swap)
>
> No, /boot should not be on LVM.
>
> > and that is the catch.  /boot in most installations is not on a separate
> > partition.
>
> I personally hate auto-partitioning things (well, for that matter even
> auto-installing things). Don't bother with them... even if you want
> to, I'm sure most of these CD installers come with manual partitioning
> options.
>
> > I had that for a couple of years and it was more trouble than it was
> > worth.  Primary issue is with the default initrd generated when a new
> > kernel is installed -- had to do all sorts of obscure initrd
> > configurations to make sure it booted up fine on an LVM.
>
> I've been using LVM for over four years now and it works perfectly. I
> can add and remove physical hard drives whenever I want without
> worrying about repartitioning.
>
> HTH.
>
> ___
> ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
>
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] which flavour of linux to choose

2008-07-21 Thread neha sharma
Thank you everyone and i guess i will go with ubuntu.




On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Arun Khan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Tuesday 22 Jul 2008, Smruti wrote:
>
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions and
> > put it on our website?
>
> Put a link to the above material instead of reinventing the wheel.
>
> --
> Arun Khan
>
> ___
> ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
> http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
> Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/
>
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


[ilugd] which flavour of linux to choose

2008-07-21 Thread neha sharma
hello frnz...i ve been a membr of dis grp since long bt hv been
a mere lurker yet..newayz m jus beginning off wid linux nd i
ve xp installed on ma machine nd i want to install linux too , can u guyz
tell me as to whch vrsion i shld go for nd whr wld i gt d same?
hope to gt a response..thnk u!
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/