Re: [ilugd] How to increase /root partition size in Ubun tu 8.04

2009-05-20 Thread Neha Sharma
Hi
I have a system which was dual boot and had the following configuration

/dev/sda1 NTFS
/dev/sda2 NTFS
/dev/sda3 linux
/dev/sda4 extended
/dev/sda5 lvm

The filesystem got crashed, now i am trying to recover it without corrupting
windows partition.
I booted the system in rescue mode and mounted the linux filesystem which
was on lvm in the following way...

bash$ mkdir /new
bash$ mount /dev/mapper/VG00/LogVol00

Plaese help me with the lvm concepts, so that I can understand and
resolve  the problem.





On 5/20/09, Ramkumar R artag...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you recommend putting / on a LVM device?

 No. The LVM partitions I maintain are:
 /home
 /home/music
 /home/video
 /usr
 /usr/local
 /tmp
 /var
 /root
 (swap)

 No, /boot should not be on LVM.

  and that is the catch.  /boot in most installations is not on a separate
  partition.

 I personally hate auto-partitioning things (well, for that matter even
 auto-installing things). Don't bother with them... even if you want
 to, I'm sure most of these CD installers come with manual partitioning
 options.

  I had that for a couple of years and it was more trouble than it was
  worth.  Primary issue is with the default initrd generated when a new
  kernel is installed -- had to do all sorts of obscure initrd
  configurations to make sure it booted up fine on an LVM.

 I've been using LVM for over four years now and it works perfectly. I
 can add and remove physical hard drives whenever I want without
 worrying about repartitioning.

 HTH.

 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] How to increase /root partition size in Ubun tu 8.04

2009-05-20 Thread Neha Sharma
Hi
I have a system which was dual boot and had the following configuration

/dev/sda1 NTFS
/dev/sda2 NTFS
/dev/sda3 linux
/dev/sda4 extended
/dev/sda5 lvm

The filesystem got crashed, now i am trying to recover it without corrupting
windows partition.
I booted the system in rescue mode and mounted the linux filesystem which
was on lvm in the following way...

bash$ mkdir /new
bash$ mount /dev/mapper/VG00/LogVol00 /new
bash$ reboot

then it came to the grub prompt

grub

??

now I am not able to understand what to do


Plaese help me with the lvm concepts, so that I can understand and
resolve  the problem.





On 5/20/09, Ramkumar R artag...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you recommend putting / on a LVM device?

 No. The LVM partitions I maintain are:
 /home
 /home/music
 /home/video
 /usr
 /usr/local
 /tmp
 /var
 /root
 (swap)

 No, /boot should not be on LVM.

  and that is the catch.  /boot in most installations is not on a separate
  partition.

 I personally hate auto-partitioning things (well, for that matter even
 auto-installing things). Don't bother with them... even if you want
 to, I'm sure most of these CD installers come with manual partitioning
 options.

  I had that for a couple of years and it was more trouble than it was
  worth.  Primary issue is with the default initrd generated when a new
  kernel is installed -- had to do all sorts of obscure initrd
  configurations to make sure it booted up fine on an LVM.

 I've been using LVM for over four years now and it works perfectly. I
 can add and remove physical hard drives whenever I want without
 worrying about repartitioning.

 HTH.

 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane. 
 user-groups.linux.delhihttp://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/




On 5/20/09, Neha Sharma neha...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi
 I have a system which was dual boot and had the following configuration

 /dev/sda1 NTFS
 /dev/sda2 NTFS
 /dev/sda3 linux
 /dev/sda4 extended
 /dev/sda5 lvm

 The filesystem got crashed, now i am trying to recover it without
 corrupting windows partition.
 I booted the system in rescue mode and mounted the linux filesystem which
 was on lvm in the following way...

 bash$ mkdir /new
 bash$ mount /dev/mapper/VG00/LogVol00

 Plaese help me with the lvm concepts, so that I can understand and
 resolve  the problem.





 On 5/20/09, Ramkumar R artag...@gmail.com wrote:

  Do you recommend putting / on a LVM device?

 No. The LVM partitions I maintain are:
 /home
 /home/music
 /home/video
 /usr
 /usr/local
 /tmp
 /var
 /root
 (swap)

 No, /boot should not be on LVM.

  and that is the catch.  /boot in most installations is not on a separate
  partition.

 I personally hate auto-partitioning things (well, for that matter even
 auto-installing things). Don't bother with them... even if you want
 to, I'm sure most of these CD installers come with manual partitioning
 options.

  I had that for a couple of years and it was more trouble than it was
  worth.  Primary issue is with the default initrd generated when a new
  kernel is installed -- had to do all sorts of obscure initrd
  configurations to make sure it booted up fine on an LVM.

 I've been using LVM for over four years now and it works perfectly. I
 can add and remove physical hard drives whenever I want without
 worrying about repartitioning.

 HTH.

 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/



___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


Re: [ilugd] which flavour of linux to choose

2008-07-22 Thread neha sharma
Thank you everyone and i guess i will go with ubuntu.




On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Arun Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Tuesday 22 Jul 2008, Smruti wrote:

  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Linux_distributions and
  put it on our website?

 Put a link to the above material instead of reinventing the wheel.

 --
 Arun Khan

 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


[ilugd] which flavour of linux to choose

2008-07-21 Thread neha sharma
hello frnz...i ve been a membr of dis grp since long bt hv been
a mere lurker yet..newayz m jus beginning off wid linux nd i
ve xp installed on ma machine nd i want to install linux too , can u guyz
tell me as to whch vrsion i shld go for nd whr wld i gt d same?
hope to gt a response..thnk u!
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/