[ilugd] Defragmentation Issue

2006-02-24 Thread Gurpreet Sachdeva
hi,

The output of df -kh gives:

#df -kh
FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/1/hda654G   51G 0 100% /

I beleive its a defragmentation problem.

But when I give
#defragfs -q /dev/1/hda6

It gives:
Device mounted, but not type jfs!

Please help.
Best Regards,
Gurpreet Singh

http://garrythegambler.blogspot.com/
___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/



Re: [ilugd] Defragmentation Issue

2006-02-24 Thread vikram ranade
5% of the volume space is reserved for root.
Hence the ~3GB missing space

On 2/24/06, Gurpreet Sachdeva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hi,

 The output of df -kh gives:

 #df -kh
 FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
 /dev/1/hda654G   51G 0 100% /

 I beleive its a defragmentation problem.

 But when I give
 #defragfs -q /dev/1/hda6

 It gives:
 Device mounted, but not type jfs!

 Please help.
 Best Regards,
 Gurpreet Singh

 http://garrythegambler.blogspot.com/
 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/



Re: [ilugd] Defragmentation Issue

2006-02-24 Thread vikram ranade
as far as i understand, must unix filesystems donot suffer from
fragmentation adversely (compared to M$ filesystems)


On 2/24/06, Gurpreet Sachdeva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 hi,

 The output of df -kh gives:

 #df -kh
 FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
 /dev/1/hda654G   51G 0 100% /

 I beleive its a defragmentation problem.

 But when I give
 #defragfs -q /dev/1/hda6

 It gives:
 Device mounted, but not type jfs!

 Please help.
 Best Regards,
 Gurpreet Singh

 http://garrythegambler.blogspot.com/
 ___
 ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
 http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
 Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi
 http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/


___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/



Re: [ilugd] Defragmentation Issue

2006-02-24 Thread Gora Mohanty
--- Gurpreet Sachdeva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
 #df -kh
 FilesystemSize  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
 /dev/1/hda654G   51G 0 100% /
 
 I beleive its a defragmentation problem.

Umm, no. ext2/ext3 filesystems, and probably also others, reserve some
space, that can be accessed only by root. This is probably what you
are seeing. Filesystem performance degrades badly once it is about 90%
full, so that you would be well advised to keep usage below that.

 But when I give
 #defragfs -q /dev/1/hda6
 
 It gives:
 Device mounted, but not type jfs!

Don't know what defragfs is, but seems like it is a JFS-only tool, and
your filesystem is something else. Use mount or mount -l to check.
Conventional wisdom is that, unlike FAT, modern file systems do not
need defragmentation. In fact, I am not aware of an ext3 
defragmentation tool. There used to be an offline one for ext2
filesystems, called e2defrag, but I would very much doubt that it is
actually needed.

Regards,
Gora



__ 
Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your partner now. Go to http://yahoo.shaadi.com

___
ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
Archives at: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.user-groups.linux.delhi 
http://www.mail-archive.com/ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org/