RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[John T \(Lists\)]

Tripp, I have also confirmed this and by
turning off DST support on the OS the correct time is being recorded.

 



John T

eServices For You

 

"Life is a succession
of lessons which must be lived to be understood."

Ralph Waldo Emerson
(1802-1882)

 



 



-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
12:50 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re:
[IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

 

It sounds like the XML is getting created
with a one hour difference, which sounds like a bug.  Can you try turning
off the DST support and see if new messages coming it have the correct time in
the XML?  Note that the XML for messages that have already arrived will
not be changed, it will only effect newly arriving messages.

 

Thanks,

Tripp

 

 







From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Steeley
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
3:45 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail
Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

That was one of the first
things I checked - it was enabled.

-Original Message-
From: "Daniel Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent 10/31/2006 3:36:19 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem



Not done any testing or validation of this, but in the past
I recall at least one person that did not have the "Adjust for Daylight
Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour difference. 





 





Daniel Donnelly





 



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On
Behalf Of Mark Reimer
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
3:24 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1
Time change problem

I just noticed that the same thing is
happening to me as well.

 



Mark Reimer

IT System Admin

American CareSource

972-308-6887



 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Steeley
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
2:18 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time
change problem



 

I've been running 2006.1 for a couple of weeks now with no
problems, but after the time change this past Sunday the times on the webclient
are one hour off (ie.  it will show an email arriving at 7:00AM instead of
8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is correct, the timestamp in the Imail
logs is also correct, and everything is OK when mail is downloaded to
Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that didn't fix the issue. 
I've tested different user accounts, as well as different browsers.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

Gary 

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Matrosity Hosting]

Since I've been complaining about getting a solution from 
ipswitch so I thought I should post that I did get one from them 
(Tripp).
 
Basically, logins for web messaging were taking as much as 
30 seconds if at all after the upgrade from 2006.04a, which ran perfectly, to 
2006.1 as demanded by the security issue.
 
Tripp created a new dll which removed the disk quota 
display in the new web messaging that resolved our login problems. This way I 
can hang in with this until 2006.2 shows up and decide what to do at that 
point.
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe Wolf / 
Internet Specialists, LLCSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:10 
PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

What workaround?
What dll?
 
More info please!
 
-Joe

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matrosity 
  Hosting 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:59 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue
  
  Tripp,
   
  Thank you very much for getting this workaround for me. I 
  absolutely appreciate your efforts and it looks like your new dll saved the 
  day.
   
  I reset the permissions to match the old dll and 
  everything seems to be working as it should be now. Removing the quota display 
  did the trick.
   
  Many thanks,
  Bill Foresman 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:28 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue
  
  ok, thanks.
  Bill Foresman 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  www.matrosity.com 
  850.656.2644 
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
  AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue
  
  We're still looking at it but don't have anything to 
  report right now. 
   
  Tripp
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
  Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
  
  Tripp,
   
  I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's 
  the plan?
  Bill Foresman 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  www.matrosity.com 
  850.656.2644 
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
  ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
  Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
  No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
  Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
  logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
  2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
  what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
  Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
  logon issueWe went back to the 
  originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
  logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
  earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you 
  use Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
  server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
  Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 
  PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon 
  issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
  isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
  Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
  850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview 
  yet, but we're getting > close.>>> 
  Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
  Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill 
  Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 

RE: [IMail Forum] Upgraded from 8.21 to 8.22, now POP3 won't work with SSL enabled...

[Michael Thomas - Mathbox]

Sam,

> Can't imagine what else would be hanging out on port 995 to cause this
> error.  I disabled SSL and the POP3D loaded fine.  Under 8.21 
> it loaded fine
> with SSL.  Anyone have an idea?  Haven't tried rebooting the 
> server just
> yet...

I have the same problem. Ever since I moved Imail to the new server, if I
restart the machine or just the POP3 service, I have had to restart POP3 4
or 5 times before it would start clean. I thought it was a problem that had
been there all along, but only became visible when I moved Imail to the
faster machine. Prior to the move, Imail had been running on a dual 1 Ghz
PIII system. So, I thought it was a processor speed related race condition.
NOPE! I just happen to have the old server still available. I haven't gotten
around to making it into a gateway server yet. So, I fired it up and TLS was
not enabled on the old system. I hadn't enabled TLS until after I moved it!
Like you, if I disable TLS, POP3 starts up just fine on the first try. So,
thank you for figuring that out.

I also happened to notice the Version info on the admin panel. 8.22 dated
October 2005.

Ipswitch, can we get this fixed also?

Michael Thomas
Mathbox
978-683-6718
1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free)
 



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] WebMail error (was Address book issue)

[Dave Doherty]

Hi,
 
I'm resending this because I forgot to change the subject...
 
The following error appears 
occasionally in the message display pane of the web interface on my 
installation of IMail 2006.1.
 
Any ideas?  The kbase returned a 
null result on a search for "Value cannot be null. Parameter 
name: buffer"
 
-Dave Doherty Skywaves, 
Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 




If you encounter this 
error again, please provide the following information to your network 
administrator to assist in trouble-shooting. 
Message:Value cannot be 
null. Parameter name: buffer StackTrace:at 
System.IO.BinaryWriter.Write(Byte[] buffer) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessAttachmentType(Entity part, String 
partreference) at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessBodyPart(Entity part, 
String partreference) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessMultipartMixedType(Entity part, String 
partreference) at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessMultipartType(Entity 
part, String partreference) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessBodyPart(Entity part, String 
partreference) at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.GetMessageFromServer() at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Folder.GetMessage(Int32 messageIndex) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Client.PreviewMsg.LoadPreviewPane(String Folder, String 
SequenceNumber) at Ipswitch.Web.Client.PreviewMessage.Page_Load(Object sender, 
EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at 
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() at 
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain()

RE: [IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

[mnapuran]

> I second that.
> I had the same panic when I first ran it.
> Just watch the spam & notspam folder for 2 weeks and make sure you manually
> clean it up.
> Then follow the last steps of the doc and go live.
> It works wonders! 

2 weeks huh?  Long time.  So don't run the dbupdate until after the 2 weeks?  
We process 
about 19,000 emails daily on the server.  2 Weeks is gonna be a while :P

Mike N
FXOL

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] Address book issue

[Dave Doherty]

Hi,
 
This error appears occasionally in the 
message display pane of the web interface on my installation of IMail 
2006.1:
 
Any ideas?  The kbase returned a 
null result on a search for "Value cannot be null. Parameter 
name: buffer"
 
-Dave Doherty Skywaves, 
Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

If you encounter this 
error again, please provide the following information to your network 
administrator to assist in trouble-shooting. 
Message:Value cannot be 
null. Parameter name: buffer StackTrace:at 
System.IO.BinaryWriter.Write(Byte[] buffer) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessAttachmentType(Entity part, String 
partreference) at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessBodyPart(Entity part, 
String partreference) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessMultipartMixedType(Entity part, String 
partreference) at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessMultipartType(Entity 
part, String partreference) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.ProcessBodyPart(Entity part, String 
partreference) at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Message.GetMessageFromServer() at 
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.Imap4Folder.GetMessage(Int32 messageIndex) at 
Ipswitch.Web.Client.PreviewMsg.LoadPreviewPane(String Folder, String 
SequenceNumber) at Ipswitch.Web.Client.PreviewMessage.Page_Load(Object sender, 
EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at 
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() at 
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain()

Re: [IMail Forum] Address book issue

[Dave Doherty]

Thanks, Matt. It worked like a 
charm!
 
< administering 40 lashes with a wet 
noodle on self for not RTFKB! >
 
-d

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matt 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:12 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Address book 
  issue
  Dave,    http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20060627-JH01.htmI 
  hate to make an example of you, but we all make mistakes like not checking the 
  KB first from time to time :)MattDave Doherty wrote: 
  



Hi all-
 
I upgraded from 8.15 to 2000.1, and 
while I have had very few issues, I do have one that is causing me a 
problem. It seems that 2000 is not recognizing the address books created in 
8.15. The 2000 installation was on a clean installation of Win2K, and I 
copied the domain registry keys and all the mailbox files over. Everything 
else seems to work.
 
Is this a known issue, or one that 
has been addressed here?
 
-Dave Doherty Skywaves, 
Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Joe Wolf / Internet Specialists, LLC]

What workaround?
What dll?
 
More info please!
 
-Joe

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Matrosity 
  Hosting 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:59 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue
  
  Tripp,
   
  Thank you very much for getting this workaround for me. I 
  absolutely appreciate your efforts and it looks like your new dll saved the 
  day.
   
  I reset the permissions to match the old dll and 
  everything seems to be working as it should be now. Removing the quota display 
  did the trick.
   
  Many thanks,
  Bill Foresman 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  www.matrosity.com 850.656.2644 
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:28 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue
  
  ok, thanks.
  Bill Foresman 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  www.matrosity.com 
  850.656.2644 
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
  AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue
  
  We're still looking at it but don't have anything to 
  report right now. 
   
  Tripp
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
  HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
  Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
  
  Tripp,
   
  I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's 
  the plan?
  Bill Foresman 
  Matrosity Hosting 
  www.matrosity.com 
  850.656.2644 
   
  
  
  From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
  ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
  Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue
  No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
  Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
  logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
  2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
  what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
  Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
  Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
  logon issueWe went back to the 
  originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
  logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
  earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you 
  use Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
  server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
  Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: 
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 
  PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon 
  issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
  isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
  Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
  850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview 
  yet, but we're getting > close.>>> 
  Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
  Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill 
  Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
  850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
  web logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 
  2006.1 and reproduced the > problem on that test box. Then we upgraded 
  IMail on that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the 
  problem went away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 
  and the problem did not return. Since then we've been unable > to 
  duplicate again on that box. I've tried three other machines with > 
  your registry and could not duplicate. Still looking...>> 
  Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matros

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Matrosity Hosting]

Tripp,
 
Thank you very much for getting this workaround for me. I 
absolutely appreciate your efforts and it looks like your new dll saved the 
day.
 
I reset the permissions to match the old dll and everything 
seems to be working as it should be now. Removing the quota display did the 
trick.
 
Many thanks,
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:28 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
web logon issue

ok, thanks.
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
web logon issue

We're still looking at it but don't have anything to report 
right now. 
 
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

Tripp,
 
I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the 
plan?
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 slow web logon issue
No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueWe went back to the 
originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use 
Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: 
Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, 
but we're getting > close.>>> 
Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 
and reproduced the > problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on 
that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the problem went 
away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 and the problem 
did not return. Since then we've been unable > to duplicate again on that 
box. I've tried three other machines with > your registry and could not 
duplicate. Still looking...>> Tripp>>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We could live without the disk indicator if that 
improves login speed. > It seems to me that there must be something in 
the registry that is > causing this since you guys were able to reproduce 
on your end?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> 
www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 ODBC error in iClient

[Jason Parkhill]

I will also note that the following articles
state that the “Cannot open database XX. It may not be a
database that your application recognizes, or the file may be corrupt” error
may mean the ODBC Access drivers are of a different version than the Access
database. I see that when I copy and try to open WorkgroupShare.mdb in Access
2003 it chokes and says it is in Access 95 format and prompts me to convert it.

 

http://tutorials.aspfaq.com/8000x-errors/80004005-errors.html

http://www.imageaid.net/web-hosting-support/db_error_2.htm

http://www.smartcomputing.com/techsupport/detail.aspx?guid=&ErrorID=21937

 

Still doesn’t explain why it works fine for a period of time
before dying, though.

 



-
L. Jason Parkhill
Senior Associate Director of ITS for Academic Technology
  Washington & Jefferson College











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jason Parkhill
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
8:17 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 ODBC
error in iClient



 

We upgraded to 2006.1 and get the following error after every
12-24 hours in the left pane of iClient at logon. Stopping/starting the World
Wide Web Publishing Service (IIS) fixes the problem. Note this is NOT the same
error referenced in IM-20060420-JH04 and we HAVE set the perms as
specified in the Folder Rights section of IM-20060310-JH01. Ran 2006.01-2006.03
on this box w/o this problem for 9 months, it only manifested after recent
upgrade. We use the built-in NT database for our user data on Server 2003 SP1. Any
ideas? Have not heard back yet from Ipswitch support about this after 24 hours.

-Jason

***

If you encounter this error again, please provide the following
information to your network administrator to assist in trouble-shooting.

Message:
ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Cannot open database
'(unknown)'. It may not be a database that your application recognizes, or the
file may be corrupt. ERROR [IM006] [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's
SQLSetConnectAttr failed ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access
Driver] Cannot open database '(unknown)'. It may not be a database that your
application recognizes, or the file may be corrupt.

StackTrace:
at System.Data.Odbc.OdbcConnection.Open() at Ipswitch.Web.Mail.WgsContactSource..ctor(IUser
user) at Ipswitch.Web.Client.ContactTree.ProcessContactFolders(IUser user) at
Ipswitch.Web.Client.ContactTree.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) at
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive()
at System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() at
System.Web.UI.Control.AddedControl(Control control, Int32 index) at
System.Web.UI.ControlCollection.Add(Control child) at
Infragistics.WebUI.UltraWebListbar.UltraWebListbar.CreateChildControls() at
System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls() at
System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() at
System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() at
System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() at
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain()

RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[SKNIGHT]

All things I will look into.  Thanks again for all your help.

 







- Original Message - 





From: SKNIGHT






To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 





Sent: Tuesday, October
31, 2006 8:26 PM





Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
10-30 minute delivery problems





 





Well, I put it back to mxGuard, because at least it was running faster.
 However I notice, it’s starting an mxgurd.exe process (I’m
assuming to deliver the mail), however one mxGuard task has been running for
just shy of 4 hours.  Should I terminate that?  (The same as if it
were smtp32.exe?)

 

If the process is not being started for each message, are you referring
to the delivery application path/filename?  Out of curiosity, if you
specify the wrong location, will it use the windows path to find the correct
location?

 







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
8:11 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30
minute delivery problems



 



Look in your task list to make sure you don't have a bunch
of smtp32.exe processes stuck.  In IMail 7, each smtp32 process delivers a
message and if a bunch of them are hung up new ones won't start.  





 





Otherwise, It sounds like the process is not being started
for each message, so double check the path/filename in the sendname to make
sure it's correct.





 





Tripp





 





- Original Message - 







From: SKNIGHT






To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 





Sent: Tuesday, October
31, 2006 8:00 PM





Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
10-30 minute delivery problems





 



No errors in the logs (aside from the generic
undeliverables/mailbox full/unknown user messages) , and no errors in any of my
system logs either.  Even the generic postmaster mails have been cut down
(there never more than 5-10 GSE files in the spool).

 



---
http://www.thoughtbludgeon.com
http://www.edgey.net
http://www.myspace.com/edgey 
http://www.stephenjamesknight.com
http://www.myspace.com/sjknight 

AIM: SINIBYTE
ICQ: 126370648
Yahoo!:  Thoughtbludgeon

'when you're holding a hammer,
everything looks like a nail.'











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
7:48 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30
minute delivery problems



 



Are there any error messages in the log files?





 





Tripp





 







- Original Message - 





From: SKNIGHT






To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 





Sent: Tuesday, October
31, 2006 7:42 PM





Subject: [IMail Forum]
10-30 minute delivery problems





 



I recently posted this on the IMail
forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard for almost a year now,
and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred of bad mails (creating an
undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other mails).  I removed the
spam filter for a couple days, but the default smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30
minute delay on all mail sent through it.  

 

Does anyone have an explanation for that?

 

It seems the spool folder gets up to about
400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 files (as if it were delivering lots
of mail at one shot every few minutes).  I cleaned up the spool, and the
web folder for any old entries, and even started from a clear complete empty
spool, but all of my clients were complaining about a 10-30 minute delay
between mails.  This includes sending mail between people on the same
machine on the same domain in the same physical location.

 

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[Matrosity Hosting]

David (mxguard) is very involved on the list so you should 
hear from him soon on this.
 
Regards,
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:35 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
delivery problems

If you use the wrong location it won't start.  
I can't answer questions on the MXGuard as I have no information on 
it.
 
Tripp
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  SKNIGHT 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:26 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
  
  
  
  Well, I put it back to mxGuard, because at least it 
  was running faster.  However I notice, it’s starting an mxgurd.exe 
  process (I’m assuming to deliver the mail), however one mxGuard task has been 
  running for just shy of 4 hours.  Should I terminate that?  (The 
  same as if it were smtp32.exe?)
   
  If the process is not being started for each message, 
  are you referring to the delivery application path/filename?  Out of 
  curiosity, if you specify the wrong location, will it use the windows path to 
  find the correct location?
   
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:11 
  PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
   
  
  Look in your task list to make 
  sure you don't have a bunch of smtp32.exe processes stuck.  In IMail 7, 
  each smtp32 process delivers a message and if a bunch of them are hung up new 
  ones won't start.  
  
   
  
  Otherwise, It sounds like the 
  process is not being started for each message, so double check the 
  path/filename in the sendname to make sure it's 
  correct.
  
   
  
  Tripp
  
   
  
  - Original Message - 
  
  

From: SKNIGHT 


To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 


Sent: 
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:00 PM

Subject: RE: 
[IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery 
problems

 
No errors in the 
logs (aside from the generic undeliverables/mailbox full/unknown user 
messages) , and no errors in any of my system logs either.  Even the 
generic postmaster mails have been cut down (there never more than 5-10 GSE 
files in the spool).
 

---http://www.thoughtbludgeon.comhttp://www.edgey.nethttp://www.myspace.com/edgey 
http://www.stephenjamesknight.comhttp://www.myspace.com/sjknight 
AIM: SINIBYTEICQ: 126370648Yahoo!:  
Thoughtbludgeon
'when 
you're holding a hammer, everything looks like a 
nail.'




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:48 
PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
delivery problems
 

Are there any error messages in 
the log files?

 

Tripp

 

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: SKNIGHT 
  
  
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  
  Sent: 
  Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:42 PM
  
  Subject: 
  [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery 
  problems
  
   
  I recently posted 
  this on the IMail forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard 
  for almost a year now, and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred 
  of bad mails (creating an undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other 
  mails).  I removed the spam filter for a couple days, but the default 
  smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30 minute delay on all mail sent through it. 
   
   
  Does anyone have 
  an explanation for that?
   
  It seems the 
  spool folder gets up to about 400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 
  files (as if it were delivering lots of mail at one shot every few 
  minutes).  I cleaned up the spool, and the web folder for any old 
  entries, and even started from a clear complete empty spool, but all of my 
  clients were complaining about a 10-30 minute delay between mails. 
   This includes sending mail between people on the same machine on the 
  same domain in the same physical location.
   
  Any help would be 
  appreciated, 
  thanks.

Re: [IMail Forum] Address book issue

[Mike N]

In addition, I found that the WGSCVRT.exe 
utility probably won't work if you have an external database and 
a custom ODBC connector since it tries to read the IMail tables 
directly instead of going through the custom DLL.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Dave Doherty 
  
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:04 
  PM
  Subject: [IMail Forum] Address book 
  issue
  
  Hi all-
   
  I upgraded from 8.15 to 2000.1, and 
  while I have had very few issues, I do have one that is causing me a 
  problem. It seems that 2000 is not recognizing the address books created in 
  8.15. The 2000 installation was on a clean installation of Win2K, and I copied 
  the domain registry keys and all the mailbox files over. Everything else seems 
  to work.
   
  Is this a known issue, or one that has 
  been addressed here?
   
  -Dave Doherty Skywaves, 
  Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [IMail Forum] Unable to log into web IClient 2006.1 after upgrade

[Mike N]

This was exactly the problem:
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20051206-DM07.htm
  You'll run into it especially if your database is on another server (also 
a similar problem with AD).   The reason is that .NET doesn't use the 
anonymous user when attempting to connect to the database.   It then 
promptly doesn't log anything and denies the authentication.


 A security suggestion: if you edit the machine.config, instead of using 
the suggested


use

   which avoids credentials stored in a plain text file.   That and their 
processModel change will cause it to use the IIS anonymous user credentials 
when accessing the DB.


 [ I couldn't resist calling myself a numchuck for not knowing at 12:34 AM 
what everyone else knows - you have to refer to Knowledge base article 
Number 2 0 0 5 1 2 0 6 dash D M 0 7 to make it work ]



- Original Message - 
From: "Deborah Chard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:48 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Unable to log into web IClient 2006.1 after 
upgrade




Mike,

I ran into the same problem and posted it to this forum a couple of weeks
ago.  I finally contacted Ipswitch tech support and after 5 hours on the
phone with a tech could not figure it out.  We worked to change 
permissions

in IIS, the registry and all over the place and the issue was not
satisfactorily resolved.  Look at the permissions that the default website
anonymous user has.  If you do get this resolved, please post here because 
I

will have to go back and revisit this issue.


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[Tripp Allen]

If you use the wrong location it won't start.  
I can't answer questions on the MXGuard as I have no information on 
it.
 
Tripp
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  SKNIGHT 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:26 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
  
  
  
  Well, I put it back to mxGuard, because at least it 
  was running faster.  However I notice, it’s starting an mxgurd.exe 
  process (I’m assuming to deliver the mail), however one mxGuard task has been 
  running for just shy of 4 hours.  Should I terminate that?  (The 
  same as if it were smtp32.exe?)
   
  If the process is not being started for each message, 
  are you referring to the delivery application path/filename?  Out of 
  curiosity, if you specify the wrong location, will it use the windows path to 
  find the correct location?
   
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:11 
  PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
   
  
  Look in your task list to make 
  sure you don't have a bunch of smtp32.exe processes stuck.  In IMail 7, 
  each smtp32 process delivers a message and if a bunch of them are hung up new 
  ones won't start.  
  
   
  
  Otherwise, It sounds like the 
  process is not being started for each message, so double check the 
  path/filename in the sendname to make sure it's 
  correct.
  
   
  
  Tripp
  
   
  
  - Original Message - 
  
  

From: SKNIGHT 


To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 


Sent: 
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:00 PM

Subject: RE: 
[IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery 
problems

 
No errors in the 
logs (aside from the generic undeliverables/mailbox full/unknown user 
messages) , and no errors in any of my system logs either.  Even the 
generic postmaster mails have been cut down (there never more than 5-10 GSE 
files in the spool).
 

---http://www.thoughtbludgeon.comhttp://www.edgey.nethttp://www.myspace.com/edgey 
http://www.stephenjamesknight.comhttp://www.myspace.com/sjknight 
AIM: SINIBYTEICQ: 126370648Yahoo!:  
Thoughtbludgeon
'when 
you're holding a hammer, everything looks like a 
nail.'




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:48 
PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
delivery problems
 

Are there any error messages in 
the log files?

 

Tripp

 

  
  - Original Message - 
  
  
  From: SKNIGHT 
  
  
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  
  Sent: 
  Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:42 PM
  
  Subject: 
  [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery 
  problems
  
   
  I recently posted 
  this on the IMail forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard 
  for almost a year now, and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred 
  of bad mails (creating an undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other 
  mails).  I removed the spam filter for a couple days, but the default 
  smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30 minute delay on all mail sent through it. 
   
   
  Does anyone have 
  an explanation for that?
   
  It seems the 
  spool folder gets up to about 400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 
  files (as if it were delivering lots of mail at one shot every few 
  minutes).  I cleaned up the spool, and the web folder for any old 
  entries, and even started from a clear complete empty spool, but all of my 
  clients were complaining about a 10-30 minute delay between mails. 
   This includes sending mail between people on the same machine on the 
  same domain in the same physical location.
   
  Any help would be 
  appreciated, 
  thanks.

RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[SKNIGHT]

Well, I put it back to mxGuard, because at least it was running faster.
 However I notice, it’s starting an mxgurd.exe process (I’m assuming
to deliver the mail), however one mxGuard task has been running for just shy of
4 hours.  Should I terminate that?  (The same as if it were smtp32.exe?)

 

If the process is not being started for each message, are you referring
to the delivery application path/filename?  Out of curiosity, if you specify
the wrong location, will it use the windows path to find the correct location?

 







From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
8:11 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30
minute delivery problems



 



Look in your task list to make sure you don't have a bunch
of smtp32.exe processes stuck.  In IMail 7, each smtp32 process delivers a
message and if a bunch of them are hung up new ones won't start.  





 





Otherwise, It sounds like the process is not being started
for each message, so double check the path/filename in the sendname to make
sure it's correct.





 





Tripp





 





- Original Message - 







From: SKNIGHT






To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 





Sent: Tuesday, October
31, 2006 8:00 PM





Subject: RE: [IMail Forum]
10-30 minute delivery problems





 



No errors in the logs (aside from the
generic undeliverables/mailbox full/unknown user messages) , and no errors in
any of my system logs either.  Even the generic postmaster mails have been
cut down (there never more than 5-10 GSE files in the spool).

 



---
http://www.thoughtbludgeon.com
http://www.edgey.net
http://www.myspace.com/edgey 
http://www.stephenjamesknight.com
http://www.myspace.com/sjknight 

AIM: SINIBYTE
ICQ: 126370648
Yahoo!:  Thoughtbludgeon

'when you're holding a hammer,
everything looks like a nail.'











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
7:48 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30
minute delivery problems



 



Are there any error messages in the log files?





 





Tripp





 







- Original Message - 





From: SKNIGHT






To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 





Sent: Tuesday, October
31, 2006 7:42 PM





Subject: [IMail Forum]
10-30 minute delivery problems





 



I recently posted this on the IMail
forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard for almost a year now,
and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred of bad mails (creating an
undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other mails).  I removed the
spam filter for a couple days, but the default smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30
minute delay on all mail sent through it.  

 

Does anyone have an explanation for that?

 

It seems the spool folder gets up to about
400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 files (as if it were delivering lots
of mail at one shot every few minutes).  I cleaned up the spool, and the
web folder for any old entries, and even started from a clear complete empty
spool, but all of my clients were complaining about a 10-30 minute delay
between mails.  This includes sending mail between people on the same
machine on the same domain in the same physical location.

 

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

[IMail Forum] 2006.1 ODBC error in iClient

[Jason Parkhill]

We upgraded to 2006.1 and get the following error after every 12-24
hours in the left pane of iClient at logon. Stopping/starting the World Wide
Web Publishing Service (IIS) fixes the problem. Note this is NOT the same error
referenced in IM-20060420-JH04 and we HAVE set the perms as
specified in the Folder Rights section of IM-20060310-JH01. Ran 2006.01-2006.03
on this box w/o this problem for 9 months, it only manifested after recent
upgrade. We use the built-in NT database for our user data on Server 2003 SP1.
Any ideas? Have not heard back yet from Ipswitch support about this after 24
hours.

-Jason

***

If you encounter this error again, please provide the following
information to your network administrator to assist in trouble-shooting.

Message:
ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access Driver] Cannot open database
'(unknown)'. It may not be a database that your application recognizes, or the
file may be corrupt. ERROR [IM006] [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] Driver's
SQLSetConnectAttr failed ERROR [HY000] [Microsoft][ODBC Microsoft Access
Driver] Cannot open database '(unknown)'. It may not be a database that your
application recognizes, or the file may be corrupt.

StackTrace:
at System.Data.Odbc.OdbcConnection.Open() at
Ipswitch.Web.Mail.WgsContactSource..ctor(IUser user) at
Ipswitch.Web.Client.ContactTree.ProcessContactFolders(IUser user) at
Ipswitch.Web.Client.ContactTree.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) at
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) at
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() at System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive()
at System.Web.UI.Control.AddedControl(Control control, Int32 index) at
System.Web.UI.ControlCollection.Add(Control child) at
Infragistics.WebUI.UltraWebListbar.UltraWebListbar.CreateChildControls() at
System.Web.UI.Control.EnsureChildControls() at
System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() at System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal()
at System.Web.UI.Control.PreRenderRecursiveInternal() at
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain()

Re: [IMail Forum] Address book issue

[Matt]

Dave,

    http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/IM-20060627-JH01.htm

I hate to make an example of you, but we all make mistakes like not
checking the KB first from time to time :)

Matt



Dave Doherty wrote:

  
  
  
  Hi all-
   
  I upgraded from 8.15 to
2000.1, and while I have had very few issues, I do have one that is
causing me a problem. It seems that 2000 is not recognizing the address
books created in 8.15. The 2000 installation was on a clean
installation of Win2K, and I copied the domain registry keys and all
the mailbox files over. Everything else seems to work.
   
  Is this a known issue, or
one that has been addressed here?
   
  -Dave Doherty
 Skywaves, Inc.
 508-425-7176
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  

Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[Tripp Allen]

Look in your task list to make sure you don't have 
a bunch of smtp32.exe processes stuck.  In IMail 7, each smtp32 process 
delivers a message and if a bunch of them are hung up new ones won't 
start.  
 
Otherwise, It sounds like the process is not being 
started for each message, so double check the path/filename in the sendname to 
make sure it's correct.
 
Tripp
 
- Original Message - 

  From: 
  SKNIGHT 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 8:00 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
  
  
  No errors in the logs 
  (aside from the generic undeliverables/mailbox full/unknown user messages) , 
  and no errors in any of my system logs either.  Even the generic 
  postmaster mails have been cut down (there never more than 5-10 GSE files in 
  the spool).
   
  
  ---http://www.thoughtbludgeon.comhttp://www.edgey.nethttp://www.myspace.com/edgey 
  http://www.stephenjamesknight.comhttp://www.myspace.com/sjknight 
  AIM: SINIBYTEICQ: 126370648Yahoo!:  
  Thoughtbludgeon
  'when 
  you're holding a hammer, everything looks like a 
  nail.'
  
  
  
  
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:48 
  PMTo: 
  Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
   
  
  Are there any error messages in 
  the log files?
  
   
  
  Tripp
  
   
  

- Original Message - 


From: SKNIGHT 


To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 


Sent: 
Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:42 PM

Subject: [IMail 
Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

 
I recently posted 
this on the IMail forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard 
for almost a year now, and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred 
of bad mails (creating an undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other 
mails).  I removed the spam filter for a couple days, but the default 
smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30 minute delay on all mail sent through it. 
 
 
Does anyone have an 
explanation for that?
 
It seems the spool 
folder gets up to about 400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 files (as 
if it were delivering lots of mail at one shot every few minutes).  I 
cleaned up the spool, and the web folder for any old entries, and even 
started from a clear complete empty spool, but all of my clients were 
complaining about a 10-30 minute delay between mails.  This includes 
sending mail between people on the same machine on the same domain in the 
same physical location.
 
Any help would be 
appreciated, 
thanks.

[IMail Forum] Address book issue

[Dave Doherty]

Hi all-
 
I upgraded from 8.15 to 2000.1, and 
while I have had very few issues, I do have one that is causing me a 
problem. It seems that 2000 is not recognizing the address books created in 
8.15. The 2000 installation was on a clean installation of Win2K, and I copied 
the domain registry keys and all the mailbox files over. Everything else seems 
to work.
 
Is this a known issue, or one that has 
been addressed here?
 
-Dave Doherty Skywaves, 
Inc. 508-425-7176 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[SKNIGHT]

No errors in the logs (aside from the
generic undeliverables/mailbox full/unknown user messages) , and no errors in
any of my system logs either.  Even the generic postmaster mails have been cut
down (there never more than 5-10 GSE files in the spool).

 



---
http://www.thoughtbludgeon.com
http://www.edgey.net
http://www.myspace.com/edgey 
http://www.stephenjamesknight.com
http://www.myspace.com/sjknight 

AIM: SINIBYTE
ICQ: 126370648
Yahoo!:  Thoughtbludgeon

'when you're holding a hammer,
everything looks like a nail.'











From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tripp Allen
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
7:48 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30
minute delivery problems



 



Are there any error messages in the log files?





 





Tripp





 







- Original Message - 





From: SKNIGHT






To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 





Sent: Tuesday, October
31, 2006 7:42 PM





Subject: [IMail Forum]
10-30 minute delivery problems





 



I recently posted this on the IMail
forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard for almost a year now,
and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred of bad mails (creating an
undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other mails).  I removed the
spam filter for a couple days, but the default smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30
minute delay on all mail sent through it.  

 

Does anyone have an explanation for that?

 

It seems the spool folder gets up to about
400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 files (as if it were delivering lots
of mail at one shot every few minutes).  I cleaned up the spool, and the
web folder for any old entries, and even started from a clear complete empty
spool, but all of my clients were complaining about a 10-30 minute delay between
mails.  This includes sending mail between people on the same machine on
the same domain in the same physical location.

 

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

RE: [IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

[Beach Computers]

I second that.
I had the same panic when I first ran it.
Just watch the spam & notspam folder for 2 weeks and make sure you manually
clean it up.
Then follow the last steps of the doc and go live.
It works wonders! 


 
Dave
 
 ---
|Beach Computers|
|Affordable Hosting Solutions   |
|http://www.beachcomp.com   |
 ===
|Cheap Domain Warehouse |
|Get Your Own Dot!  |
|http://www.cheapdomainwarehouse.com|
 -- 


Disclaimer and confidentiality note:

The contents of this communication are intended/meant only for addressee(s)
and may contain information that is privileged or otherwise confidential.
If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the
contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.
The contents of this e-mail shall not be forwarded to any third party. If
you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete
it from your system without copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender
of the error by reply email, so that the sender's address records
can be corrected.
Views and opinions are solely those of the sender unless clearly indicated
as being that of Beach Computers or any of it's affiliated companies.
Beach Computers cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has
been maintained or that it is free of errors, virus, interception or
interference.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Frantz
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:21 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

Although I have not used ASSP, I believe you need to leave it in learning
mode for two weeks in order to eliminate false positives.

-Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

Installed ASSP 4+ days ago, and all seems fine. Except I'm getting A LOT of
valid email blocked via the Beyesian filter.  Is there a way to make it less
sensitive or something?

Mike N
FXOL

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[Tripp Allen]

Are there any error messages in the log 
files?
 
Tripp
 

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  SKNIGHT 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:42 
  PM
  Subject: [IMail Forum] 10-30 minute 
  delivery problems
  
  
  I recently posted 
  this on the IMail forums.  I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard for 
  almost a year now, and recently we had a virus, that generated hundred of bad 
  mails (creating an undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other mails). 
   I removed the spam filter for a couple days, but the default smtp32.exe 
  seems to have a 10-30 minute delay on all mail sent through it. 
   
   
  Does anyone have an 
  explanation for that?
   
  It seems the spool 
  folder gets up to about 400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 files (as if 
  it were delivering lots of mail at one shot every few minutes).  I 
  cleaned up the spool, and the web folder for any old entries, and even started 
  from a clear complete empty spool, but all of my clients were complaining 
  about a 10-30 minute delay between mails.  This includes sending mail 
  between people on the same machine on the same domain in the same physical 
  location.
   
  Any help would be 
  appreciated, 
thanks.

[IMail Forum] 10-30 minute delivery problems

[SKNIGHT]

I recently posted this on the IMail forums.
 I had been running IMail 7.15 with mxGuard for almost a year now, and
recently we had a virus, that generated hundred of bad mails (creating an
undeliverable loop generating hundreds of other mails).  I removed the
spam filter for a couple days, but the default smtp32.exe seems to have a 10-30
minute delay on all mail sent through it.  

 

Does anyone have an explanation for that?

 

It seems the spool folder gets up to about
400 files, then drops down to about 30-70 files (as if it were delivering lots
of mail at one shot every few minutes).  I cleaned up the spool, and the
web folder for any old entries, and even started from a clear complete empty
spool, but all of my clients were complaining about a 10-30 minute delay
between mails.  This includes sending mail between people on the same
machine on the same domain in the same physical location.

 

Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

RE: [IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

[Jeff Frantz]

Although I have not used ASSP, I believe you need to leave it in
learning mode for two weeks in order to eliminate false positives.

-Jeff

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 5:55 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

Installed ASSP 4+ days ago, and all seems fine. Except I'm getting A LOT
of valid email 
blocked via the Beyesian filter.  Is there a way to make it less
sensitive or something?

Mike N
FXOL

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Unable to log into web IClient 2006.1 after upgrade

[Deborah Chard]

Mike,

I ran into the same problem and posted it to this forum a couple of weeks
ago.  I finally contacted Ipswitch tech support and after 5 hours on the
phone with a tech could not figure it out.  We worked to change permissions
in IIS, the registry and all over the place and the issue was not
satisfactorily resolved.  Look at the permissions that the default website
anonymous user has.  If you do get this resolved, please post here because I
will have to go back and revisit this issue.

Deb Chard
ILX Lightwave

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike N
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 7:50 AM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Unable to log into web IClient 2006.1 after
upgrade

More details -

   I found web.config in the WebClient folder and enabled tracing, 
IMap4Trace, and SMTPTrace.  I was able to get trace output to the browser 
window.   It detailed what the .NET IClient application was doing, but of 
course no useful information.

I tried putting the IMAP4 server into debug log mode and restarted the 
service.  I see other users in the IMAP4 session, but no login from webmail 
IClient.   I had a test system where I turned off the IMAP4 service and 
tried to log into that system.   I then get a "Reason: connection refused" 
in the login failure (as expected).On this problem system, if I turn off

the IMAP service and try to log in.  I still get the same "Reason: Failed to

authorize user." as when the IMAP service runs.

   So the problem is that the 2006.1 Webmail IClient is not attempting to 
log into IMAP.   Does anyone know how to make the 2006.1 Webmail IClient try

to log into IMAP instead of "who knows what" authentication method it is 
currently using?

   Thanks,



- Original Message - 
From: "Mike N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: 
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2006 12:24 AM
Subject: [IMail Forum] Unable to log into web IClient 2006.1 after upgrade


> After upgrading to 2006.1, we are unable to log into the Webmail client. 
> Webadmin works fine.We get the message :
>
> Unable to log into the system.
> Reason: Failed to authorize user.
>
>   All other services POP3 and SMTP, and IMAP are working fine.   There are

> no logs in the IIS folder other than the standard access log.   There is 
> nothing in the Event logs anywhere.
>
>  There is nothing in the SYSMMDD.txt file concerning webmail login.
>
>   The Webmail anonymous user "imail_user" has access to the external 
> database.
>
>
>   How can get get more detailed diagnostics from the IClient application?

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Matrosity Hosting]

I know I'm being an a$$ on the forum but I've got a useless 
web messaging client that customers are really complaining about. I can 
appreciate a time difference but at least your web messaging is 
functional.
 
Tripp, I appreciate your efforts but I need to know what's 
going on because I can't keep telling my customers that it should be soon when 
the last problem we had took over 9 months to correct. Sorry to be a PITA but we 
really need this working for our customers and I can't wait until 
2006.2
Bill ForesmanMatrosity Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:24 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

so we can respond to something something I would say is 
annoying but not as critical and a NONWORKING web messaging 
client???
 
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

It sounds like the XML is getting created with a one hour 
difference, which sounds like a bug.  Can you try turning off the DST 
support and see if new messages coming it have the correct time in the 
XML?  Note that the XML for messages that have already arrived will not be 
changed, it will only effect newly arriving messages.
 
Thanks,
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:45 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 Time change problem
That was one of the first things I checked - it was 
enabled.-Original Message-From: "Daniel Donnelly" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:36:19 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem







Not done any testing 
or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not 
have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour 
difference. 
 
Daniel 
Donnelly
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark 
ReimerSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:24 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time 
change problem

I just noticed that the 
same thing is happening to me as well.
 

Mark 
Reimer
IT System 
Admin
American 
CareSource
972-308-6887
 




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 
31, 2006 2:18 PMTo: 
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem
 
I've been running 2006.1 for 
a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past 
Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an 
email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is 
correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK 
when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that 
didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as 
different browsers.
Any help would be greatly 
appreciated. 
Gary 

RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Matrosity Hosting]

so we can respond to something something I would say is 
annoying but not as critical and a NONWORKING web messaging 
client???
 
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

It sounds like the XML is getting created with a one hour 
difference, which sounds like a bug.  Can you try turning off the DST 
support and see if new messages coming it have the correct time in the 
XML?  Note that the XML for messages that have already arrived will not be 
changed, it will only effect newly arriving messages.
 
Thanks,
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:45 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 Time change problem
That was one of the first things I checked - it was 
enabled.-Original Message-From: "Daniel Donnelly" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:36:19 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem







Not done any testing 
or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not 
have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour 
difference. 
 
Daniel 
Donnelly
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark 
ReimerSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:24 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time 
change problem

I just noticed that the 
same thing is happening to me as well.
 

Mark 
Reimer
IT System 
Admin
American 
CareSource
972-308-6887
 




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 
31, 2006 2:18 PMTo: 
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem
 
I've been running 2006.1 for 
a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past 
Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an 
email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is 
correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK 
when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that 
didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as 
different browsers.
Any help would be greatly 
appreciated. 
Gary 

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Gary Steeley]

I turned off the Daylight Savings Time setting and the emails now display the correct time in the webclient.-Original Message-From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:50:17 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

It sounds like the XML is getting created with a one hour difference, which sounds like a bug.  Can you try turning off the DST support and see if new messages coming it have the correct time in the XML?  Note that the XML for messages that have already arrived will not be changed, it will only effect newly arriving messages.
 
Thanks,
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:45 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem
That was one of the first things I checked - it was enabled.-Original Message-From: "Daniel Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:36:19 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem







Not done any testing or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour difference. 
 
Daniel Donnelly
 
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark ReimerSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:24 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

I just noticed that the same thing is happening to me as well.
 

Mark Reimer
IT System Admin
American CareSource
972-308-6887
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:18 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem
 
I've been running 2006.1 for a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as different browsers.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. 
Gary 

[IMail Forum] Any ASSP Pro's out there?

[mnapuran]

Installed ASSP 4+ days ago, and all seems fine. Except I'm getting A LOT of 
valid email 
blocked via the Beyesian filter.  Is there a way to make it less sensitive or 
something?

Mike N
FXOL

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Brief RANT... Forgive me. ICS 2.02/Imail 8.22 Post Upgrade Woes.

[S.J.Stanaitis]

So I upgraded from ICS 2.01 to 2.02 to
apply the fix for the SMTP bug (essentially Imail 8.21 to 8.22 with a few bells
and whistles).


ANYHOW.

 

The installer wouldn’t allow me to JUST
install Imail 8.22, no, I had to upgrade every component at the same time.  Not
too big a deal if everything worked.

 

I decided to not renew my service contract
as after all the jumping around at IpSwitch I felt like keeping things stable
while I hunt down an alternative.

 

Long story short, WorkGroupShare, the
collaboration function, stopped working right.  It’d time out after trying to
get multiple entries from a shared calendar.

 

Tried restoring the Access95 Database it’s
built on (gh), wasn’t the database, was the software.  So I try to install
the old software… NOPE.

 

You’ve got to uninstall 2.02, then
reinstall 2.01 completely.  Imail, IM, and WGS.  Forget THAT.

 

Installed 2.01 on my PC, copied the
directory structure over to the Mail server, and it finally is working.

 

That’s the most idiotic installation
procedure I’ve ever dealt with.  The 3 components obviously aren’t version
dependent, and it made NO sense that to upgrade the mail server to 8.22 would
require upgrading the other 2 components at gunpoint.

 

I must give credit where it is due though,
thanks Tripp and everyone who made sure that 8.22 could be patched.  I just
wish ICS hadn’t been planned out on a diner napkin, I’d might have considered
an upgrade to 2006 then.

 



Thanks,

Sam

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Gary Steeley]

That's what I'm seeing.-Original Message-From: "Mike N" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:47:57 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem







I also verified this with a client with "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled, and a 2006.1 IClient Webmail server with "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled.
 
  In this case, it is only the timestamp shown on the inbox folder list.   The correct time displays when displaying the message.   This was a message sent from a client via Outlook Express, so the mail should have been formatted correctly.
 
   

- Original Message - 
From: Daniel Donnelly 
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

Not done any testing or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour difference. 
 

RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Tripp Allen]

It sounds like the XML is getting created with a one hour 
difference, which sounds like a bug.  Can you try turning off the DST 
support and see if new messages coming it have the correct time in the 
XML?  Note that the XML for messages that have already arrived will not be 
changed, it will only effect newly arriving messages.
 
Thanks,
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:45 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 Time change problem
That was one of the first things I checked - it was 
enabled.-Original Message-From: "Daniel Donnelly" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:36:19 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem







Not done any testing 
or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not 
have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour 
difference. 
 
Daniel 
Donnelly
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark 
ReimerSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:24 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time 
change problem

I just noticed that the 
same thing is happening to me as well.
 

Mark 
Reimer
IT System 
Admin
American 
CareSource
972-308-6887
 




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 
31, 2006 2:18 PMTo: 
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem
 
I've been running 2006.1 for 
a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past 
Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an 
email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is 
correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK 
when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that 
didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as 
different browsers.
Any help would be greatly 
appreciated. 
Gary 

Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Mike N]

Title: 2006.1 Time change problem



I also verified this with a client with "Adjust for 
Daylight Savings" enabled, and a 2006.1 IClient Webmail server with "Adjust 
for Daylight Savings" enabled.
 
  In this case, it is only the timestamp shown 
on the inbox folder list.   The correct time displays when displaying 
the message.   This was a message sent from a client via Outlook 
Express, so the mail should have been formatted correctly.
 
   

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Daniel Donnelly 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:36 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time 
  change problem
  
  Not done any 
  testing or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person 
  that did not have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 
  1 hour difference. 
   

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Gary Steeley]

That was one of the first things I checked - it was enabled.-Original Message-From: "Daniel Donnelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 3:36:19 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem







Not done any testing or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour difference. 
 
Daniel Donnelly
 
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark ReimerSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:24 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

I just noticed that the same thing is happening to me as well.
 

Mark Reimer
IT System Admin
American CareSource
972-308-6887
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 2:18 PMTo: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem
 
I've been running 2006.1 for a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as different browsers.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. 
Gary 

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Matrosity Hosting]

What was done today on this?
 
At this point I have unusable web mail and had to 
spend $300 on 3rd party software so I wouldn't lose customers due to all this. I 
spent $400 on a new switch because you guys were convinced that it was my 
hardware last time. At this point I'm expecting a $700 credit towards my next SA 
but I still need this resolved.
 
I would appreciate someone working on this problem until it 
is resolved not when 2006.2 is released as that is NOT a solution. I know I'm 
impatient but I don't have any idea what is being done.
Bill ForesmanMatrosity Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
web logon issue

We're still looking at it but don't have anything to report 
right now. 
 
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

Tripp,
 
I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the 
plan?
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 slow web logon issue
No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueWe went back to the 
originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use 
Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: 
Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, 
but we're getting > close.>>> 
Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 
and reproduced the > problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on 
that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the problem went 
away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 and the problem 
did not return. Since then we've been unable > to duplicate again on that 
box. I've tried three other machines with > your registry and could not 
duplicate. Still looking...>> Tripp>>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We could live without the disk indicator if that 
improves login speed. > It seems to me that there must be something in 
the registry that is > causing this since you guys were able to reproduce 
on your end?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> 
www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:2

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Daniel Donnelly]

Title: 2006.1 Time change problem



Not done any testing 
or validation of this, but in the past I recall at least one person that did not 
have the "Adjust for Daylight Savings" enabled and that caused a 1 hour 
difference. 
 
Daniel 
Donnelly
 
-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Mark 
ReimerSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 3:24 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time 
change problem

I just noticed that the 
same thing is happening to me as well.
 

Mark 
Reimer
IT System 
Admin
American 
CareSource
972-308-6887
 




From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Gary 
SteeleySent: Tuesday, October 
31, 2006 2:18 PMTo: 
IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change 
problem
 
I've been running 2006.1 for 
a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past 
Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an 
email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is 
correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK 
when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that 
didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as 
different browsers.
Any help would be greatly 
appreciated. 
Gary 

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Mark Reimer]

Title: 2006.1 Time change problem








I just noticed that the same thing is
happening to me as well.

 



Mark Reimer

IT System Admin

American CareSource

972-308-6887



 









From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Gary Steeley
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
2:18 PM
To: IMail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time
change problem



 

I've been running 2006.1 for a couple of weeks now with no
problems, but after the time change this past Sunday the times on the webclient
are one hour off (ie.  it will show an email arriving at 7:00AM instead of
8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is correct, the timestamp in the Imail
logs is also correct, and everything is OK when mail is downloaded to
Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that didn't fix the issue. 
I've tested different user accounts, as well as different browsers.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. 

Gary

[IMail Forum] 2006.1 Time change problem

[Gary Steeley]

Title: 2006.1 Time change problem






I've been running 2006.1 for a couple of weeks now with no problems, but after the time change this past Sunday the times on the webclient are one hour off (ie.  it will show an email arriving at 7:00AM instead of 8:00AM.)  The clock on the server is correct, the timestamp in the Imail logs is also correct, and everything is OK when mail is downloaded to Outlook.  I have rebooted the server but that didn't fix the issue.  I've tested different user accounts, as well as different browsers.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.


Gary

RE: [IMail Forum] I hope IMAIL works works with IE7

[Christopher Checca]

Yes it does … currently testing all
our apps with IE7 for the past two weeks.

 

 

ICS 2006.1 and IMail 8.15

 



Christopher Checca
Packard Transport, Inc.
IT Department
24021 South Municipal Dr
PO Box 380
Channahon, IL.  60410
815 467 9260
815 467 6939 Fax
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.packardtransport.com




-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marc Catuogno
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006
1:32 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: [IMail Forum] I hope
IMAIL works works with IE7

 

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/updatemanagement/windowsupdate/ie7announcement.mspx

 

[IMail Forum] I hope IMAIL works works with IE7

[Marc Catuogno]

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/updatemanagement/windowsupdate/ie7announcement.mspx

 

Re: [IMail Forum] Seeding Kill.lst From Outlook Blocked Sender Lists and the Mail Server Logs

[Mike N]

The only issue is that some spammers randomize the sending address by using 
one of their recipients list as the sender.   So you'd need to review 
everything, and there's no way to review this type of random valid bogus 
sender problem.   Eventually you'd end up with some unknown % of  good 
addresses in the Kill list.


- Original Message - 

Questions...

- What is the performance hit with a large Kill.lst?

- Any limits to the size of Kill.lst?

- What am I missing? What else could I do?


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Matrosity Hosting]

ok, thanks.
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp 
AllenSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 1:22 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow 
web logon issue

We're still looking at it but don't have anything to report 
right now. 
 
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

Tripp,
 
I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the 
plan?
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 slow web logon issue
No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueWe went back to the 
originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use 
Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: 
Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, 
but we're getting > close.>>> 
Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 
and reproduced the > problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on 
that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the problem went 
away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 and the problem 
did not return. Since then we've been unable > to duplicate again on that 
box. I've tried three other machines with > your registry and could not 
duplicate. Still looking...>> Tripp>>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We could live without the disk indicator if that 
improves login speed. > It seems to me that there must be something in 
the registry that is > causing this since you guys were able to reproduce 
on your end?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> 
www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:20 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> The code that generates the control is compiled 
"code behind" for the > site.> So far I haven't found anything 
that we can comment out in the .js or > .aspx pages that would make a 
difference.>> Tripp>>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:39 AM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.

[IMail Forum] Seeding Kill.lst From Outlook Blocked Sender Lists and the Mail Server Logs

[Douglas Brantley]

 I have been working on some anti-spam ideas and wanted to have you folks throw
darts at what I am doing. 

 Here is my server environment:

 - Windows Enterprize Server 2003 running virtual in SWsoft Virtuozzo 
 - Imail v8.22 

 I do not run Declude. I contacted Declude support about 
 running Declude in a Virtuozzo virtual server environment 
 and did not hear back from them. 

 I have Imail Anti-spam configured to...

 - Delete the message if two DNS Black Lists return positive
 - All filters are set to insert an X-header and/or prefix the Subject 

 I let my customer decide if they want the Rules 
 file to filter and delete the tagged messages or 
 if they want to see the tagged messages. 

 Most of my customers are small business and soloists. 
 They have a relative small number of people they 
 communicate with via e-mail. But each of their 
 customers is very important to their business. 

 My customers have expressed to me how they feel 
 they are victims of spam and are held hostage 
 by having to even see it in their inbox. 

 Some customers want every message, tags and all. 

 Some customers ask me to delete all tagged 
 messages, then we deal with the false 
 positives and add them to the white list. 

 Most of my customers run Outlook and use 
 the Junkmail filters built-in to Outlook 2003. 

 Some of my customers are very consistent at 
 marking spam in Outlook. The message is 
 moved to the Junkmail folder and then 
 they mark the message as...
 "Add Sender to Blocked Senders List". 

 I started thinking about how to use the 
 Blocked Sender List from Outlook and how 
 it culd be resource for my anti-spam efforts. 

 I asked one of my clients to send me 
 his Blocked Sender List. It contained 
 2,700 addresses.  

 I combined his Blocked Sender List with 
 the list from my Outlook Junkmail folder. 

 I wrote a program to clean out the duplicates. 

 I decided to see what I could extract from the mail server logs. 

 I wrote a program to read through the 
 mail server log file and extract addresses 
 for messages sent to NUL as the result of 
 a DNS Black List double hit or a rules 
 filter. 

 I ran this program against the 10.29.2006 log file.

 I combined the two files, cleaned it up some 
 more removing duplicates and then added it 
 to the Kill.lst. 

 I now had 7,800 addresses in Kill.lst. 

 I read through the file and deleted any 
 addresses I knew were from good sources. 

 Another program reads the mail server log 
 and counts the kills from the kill.lst.

 I installed the new Kill.lst file. 

 The new Kill.lst took out 3,243 messages in 24 hours. 

 I see a couple of advantages to using Kill.lst.

 - Reduced calls to DNS Black Lists = less network traffic. 

 - The sender gets a "message refused" error message.

 - If the sender is a good guy they will let the customer know 
   and I will delete their address from Kill.lst (or their domain)
   and add their address to the white list.  

 - My customer gets to be involved in killing spam 
   at the server by contributing their Outlook 
   Blocked Sender List thus becoming part of 
   a solution. 

 I am considering a web screen for my customers to submit 
 their Blocked Sender List.

 Questions...

 - What is the performance hit with a large Kill.lst? 

 - Any limits to the size of Kill.lst?

 - What am I missing? What else could I do? 

 Thanks in advance.

 db



 

 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Tripp Allen]

We're still looking at it but don't have anything to report 
right now. 
 
Tripp
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity 
HostingSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 11:25 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail 
Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

Tripp,
 
I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the 
plan?
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 slow web logon issue
No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueWe went back to the 
originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use 
Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: 
Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, 
but we're getting > close.>>> 
Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 
and reproduced the > problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on 
that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the problem went 
away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 and the problem 
did not return. Since then we've been unable > to duplicate again on that 
box. I've tried three other machines with > your registry and could not 
duplicate. Still looking...>> Tripp>>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We could live without the disk indicator if that 
improves login speed. > It seems to me that there must be something in 
the registry that is > causing this since you guys were able to reproduce 
on your end?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> 
www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:20 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> The code that generates the control is compiled 
"code behind" for the > site.> So far I haven't found anything 
that we can comment out in the .js or > .aspx pages that would make a 
difference.>> Tripp>>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:39 AM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Can we temporarily disable the disk indicator by 
commenting out some code?>>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: 

RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo Delaying Messages

[Barbara ONeal]

Bounce History for [EMAIL PROTECTED] < Back to My Email Preferences 
Account Status:Normal  
Total Bounces:1  
Reactivation Requests Sent:1  
 
Weekly Bounce Summary
Week of Bounced messages 
10/21/2006 1 

 
Recent Bounced Messages
Most recent messages Response 
Date Type of message sent Date Result 
10/31/2006 Auto Reactivation request  10/31/2006 Reactivation  
10/23/2006 cfwebstore5 msg #6848  10/23/2006 Hard Bounce  

 
Last Bounced Message
Remote host said: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com
account
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [0] - mta251.mail.mud.yahoo.com [BODY] 


Even yahoo doesn't know it's own users.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:41 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo Delaying Messages

My apologies to everyone for the length of my response . . .

I would concur with both John and Barbara in this situation.

Remember, Yahoo = SBC now = AT&T and they just consolidated all of their
internet services into a single data center (a few weeks back).  I would
suggest that this is a hardware problem that won't become much better as
they undercut the actual cost of providing services in their attempts to
drive all of the other DSL and hosting providers out of business.



Reality: In Illinois, they WHOLESALE the cost of a 2 wire copper circuit to
their competition for about $22.00 - just for the circuit between the CO and
the competition's customer.  Their basic rate, for stripped down service,
with dial tone, to residential customers only goes for about $12.00 plus
change and taxes and all of the other "federally authorized charges" they
tack on in the name of additional profit centers.  When they were going to
implement fiber to-the-door in Illinois the Illinois Commerce Commission
[ICC], the oversight group in the State of Illinois that is so firmly in bed
with the utility companies actually took a stand and told them they HAD to
provide bandwidth to their competitors over the same fiber, the same way
they are mandated to provide access to their competition over copper - for a
[there's no such thing as] reasonable fee.  They screamed bloody murder,
stating that it would bankrupt them and refused to commit to carrying the
competition over the fiber so the ICC told them they either carried the
competition over the fiber of they would be fined.  The resolve was to
suspend the installation of fiber to the door.

When SBC took over what was Ameritech, formerly Illinois Bell under the Bell
System, they also promised they "would not lay off any of the existing
employees or close any of the service centers in Illinois."  That was all
BS, and they immediately laid off more than 7,500 employees; gutted the
central offices of the ability to do routine maintenance; and, to further
ensure that no scheduled maintenance would be done, removed all of the BSP
manuals [Bell System Practices - the manuals that told employees how to do
everything, right down to the which screwdriver to use on what equipment and
what side cutters and strippers to use with which wire sizes].

In Virginia, and several other states, mostly Verizon territory, and parts
of Texas, they have already implemented fiber to the door, carrying anyone
who is an authorized ILEC or CLEC over the same fiber, because the
regulatory agencies in those states told them they had no choice - they were
told they are basically a vehicle for the delivery of voice and data and,
until there is a viable option of other providers who can use the rights of
way, then they MUST, in no uncertain terms, carry the competition.

What is all amounts to is the fact that Ed Whitacre, the current president
of AT&T wants to put back together the old Bell System by completing the
merger of Bell South.  After that, all that's left to complete the system is
the purchase of the RBOC that services the northwest part of the US and he
will have succeeded, albeit without Bell Labs [now Lucent / Alcatel] and
Western Electric - long ago disbanded.  Unfortunately for consumers, the
"new AT&T" will never be the same as the original Bell System because it's
all about making it as profitable as possible for the stockholders 

In summary, I predict the situation will only become far worse before it
becomes better.

In the interest of full disclosure: I am a major stockholder, owning stock
in most of the RBOCS, and subsequently AT&T - some purchased, some inherited
from family members who made what was once a smart investment; and don't
like how Whitacre is running without a throttle, hell-bent on ruining the
telecommunications structure of the Country, as he does away with
competition and ruins the level of service capable of being provided to the
American people.

In Europe, DSL service is much faster, much less expensive, and much more
widely available.  In the US, what is now AT&T, along with unnecessary
regulation on the 

RE: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Matrosity Hosting]

Tripp,
 
I've heard nada from you guys. Where are we at? What's the 
plan?
Bill Foresman 
Matrosity Hosting 
www.matrosity.com 
850.656.2644 
 


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill 
ForesmanSent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 7:45 AMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 
2006.1 slow web logon issue
No difference as far as browsers go on login, 
Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 
2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now 
what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity 
Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original 
Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueWe went back to the 
originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the 
earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use 
Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test 
server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity 
Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: 
Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that 
isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill 
Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 
850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, 
but we're getting > close.>>> 
Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 
and reproduced the > problem on that test box. Then we upgraded IMail on 
that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the problem went 
away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 and the problem 
did not return. Since then we've been unable > to duplicate again on that 
box. I've tried three other machines with > your registry and could not 
duplicate. Still looking...>> Tripp>>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> We could live without the disk indicator if that 
improves login speed. > It seems to me that there must be something in 
the registry that is > causing this since you guys were able to reproduce 
on your end?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> 
www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:20 PM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> The code that generates the control is compiled 
"code behind" for the > site.> So far I haven't found anything 
that we can comment out in the .js or > .aspx pages that would make a 
difference.>> Tripp>>> -Original 
Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > 
Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:39 AM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Can we temporarily disable the disk indicator by 
commenting out some code?>>> Bill Foresman> 
Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> 
-Original Message-> From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:29 AM> To: 
Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web 
logon issue>> Is there any difference in the login delay if they 
are using FF or IE? > Is the disk space indicator displayed during the 
delay?>> Tripp> To 
Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/su

RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo Delaying Messages

[Bruce Barnes]

AT&T offers broadband by itself 

Unpublicized DSL service [mandated by recent merger agreement with FCC and
Justice Department] won't save subscribers much 

Check this out:

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/17/BUGA2JFMBL1.DTL

Bruce Barnes

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barbara ONeal
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 10:08
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo Delaying Messages

Bounce History for [EMAIL PROTECTED] < Back to My Email Preferences 
Account Status:Normal  
Total Bounces:1  
Reactivation Requests Sent:1  
 
Weekly Bounce Summary
Week of Bounced messages 
10/21/2006 1 

 
Recent Bounced Messages
Most recent messages Response 
Date Type of message sent Date Result 
10/31/2006 Auto Reactivation request  10/31/2006 Reactivation  
10/23/2006 cfwebstore5 msg #6848  10/23/2006 Hard Bounce  

 
Last Bounced Message
Remote host said: 554 delivery error: dd This user doesn't have a yahoo.com
account
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [0] - mta251.mail.mud.yahoo.com [BODY] 


Even yahoo doesn't know it's own users.  

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bruce Barnes
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 2:41 PM
To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Yahoo Delaying Messages

My apologies to everyone for the length of my response . . .

I would concur with both John and Barbara in this situation.

Remember, Yahoo = SBC now = AT&T and they just consolidated all of their
internet services into a single data center (a few weeks back).  I would
suggest that this is a hardware problem that won't become much better as
they undercut the actual cost of providing services in their attempts to
drive all of the other DSL and hosting providers out of business.



Reality: In Illinois, they WHOLESALE the cost of a 2 wire copper circuit to
their competition for about $22.00 - just for the circuit between the CO and
the competition's customer.  Their basic rate, for stripped down service,
with dial tone, to residential customers only goes for about $12.00 plus
change and taxes and all of the other "federally authorized charges" they
tack on in the name of additional profit centers.  When they were going to
implement fiber to-the-door in Illinois the Illinois Commerce Commission
[ICC], the oversight group in the State of Illinois that is so firmly in bed
with the utility companies actually took a stand and told them they HAD to
provide bandwidth to their competitors over the same fiber, the same way
they are mandated to provide access to their competition over copper - for a
[there's no such thing as] reasonable fee.  They screamed bloody murder,
stating that it would bankrupt them and refused to commit to carrying the
competition over the fiber so the ICC told them they either carried the
competition over the fiber of they would be fined.  The resolve was to
suspend the installation of fiber to the door.

When SBC took over what was Ameritech, formerly Illinois Bell under the Bell
System, they also promised they "would not lay off any of the existing
employees or close any of the service centers in Illinois."  That was all
BS, and they immediately laid off more than 7,500 employees; gutted the
central offices of the ability to do routine maintenance; and, to further
ensure that no scheduled maintenance would be done, removed all of the BSP
manuals [Bell System Practices - the manuals that told employees how to do
everything, right down to the which screwdriver to use on what equipment and
what side cutters and strippers to use with which wire sizes].

In Virginia, and several other states, mostly Verizon territory, and parts
of Texas, they have already implemented fiber to the door, carrying anyone
who is an authorized ILEC or CLEC over the same fiber, because the
regulatory agencies in those states told them they had no choice - they were
told they are basically a vehicle for the delivery of voice and data and,
until there is a viable option of other providers who can use the rights of
way, then they MUST, in no uncertain terms, carry the competition.

What is all amounts to is the fact that Ed Whitacre, the current president
of AT&T wants to put back together the old Bell System by completing the
merger of Bell South.  After that, all that's left to complete the system is
the purchase of the RBOC that services the northwest part of the US and he
will have succeeded, albeit without Bell Labs [now Lucent / Alcatel] and
Western Electric - long ago disbanded.  Unfortunately for consumers, the
"new AT&T" will never be the same as the original Bell System because it's
all about making it as profitable as possible for the stockholders 

In summary, I predict the situation will only become far worse before it
becomes better.

In the interest of full disclosure: I am a major stockholder, owning stock
in most of the RBOCS, and subsequently AT&T - some p

Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22

[Brian T.]

I just checked my spool, same thing again today presently 900 files, only 
about 40 "Q" or "T" files.


Also how do you totally disable the IMail Antispam?  I was just looking at 
my log files and it still show "checking antispam tests" in the imail log.


Brian T.


- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22


I'm having a similar problem with 2006. I currently have about 500 Q*.GSE 
not matching Q*.SMD with a total of about 800 files in the spool. Most 
appear to be NDRs. On 8.15 I was seeing about 80-100 file sin the spool, 
so this is a major difference for me.


Max retries for null senders = 10

The delete box was not checked.  I checked it and restarted SMTP and then 
Queue Manager, with no effect.


This is a clean installation of 2006, with the registry keys and domain 
contents copied over from 8.15.


-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
508-425-7176
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





- Original Message - 
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22




10 is fine. The reason I asked is you have a lot of D files that don't 
have corresponding Q files.  This normally means that messages are 
bouncing, but the bounce message could not be delivered and was orphaned. 
If this setting is checked and the queue manager has been restarted since 
you turned it on it should delete those D files when it can't deliver the 
message.


Tripp

- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22



Yes.  Set at the default of 10.  Should I lower this?

Brian

-- Original Message --
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Date:  Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:50:07 -0500

Do you have the delete option set for messages that hit max tries with 
Null senders?


Tripp

 - Original Message - 
 From: Brian T.

 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:59 PM
 Subject: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22


 Ever since upgrading to Imail 8.22 and installing the fix for the SMTP 
vulnerability I have had several problems pop up.


 At this moment my spool contains roughtly 1400 files.  1300 "D" files 
and 100 "Q" or "T" files.  Any else seen this?


 A lot of these "D" files are .gse files that appear to be messages from 
the postmaster with the subject of Undeliverable Mail.


  Any know how I can delete these automatically?

 I tried setting up an Outbound rule but it does not appear to be 
catching anything.


 Thanks in advance.

 Brian T.

 P.S. Also I disabled the built in AntiSpam, yet when I looked at the 
log, it has a line " running antispam checks" for each message.  How can 
I verify that I do have the built in antispam disabled?










Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/





To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Mailformed Rcpt to

[Mark Gordon]

Has anyone experienced problems with malformed headers to where it locks up the 
SMTP service on imail (8.15)
Below is a snippet for examples

20061031 050334 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f76899300b24995) [213.167.225.68] EHLO 
20061031 050335 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f76899300b24995) [213.167.225.68] MAIL 
FROM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
20061031 050336 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f76899300b24995) [213.167.225.68] RCPT 
TO: <@qo:
20061031 050336 127.0.0.1   SMTPD () send error 10038
20061031 050337 127.0.0.1   SMTPD () server starting on 
port 25 of imail01.nuwebhost.com

20061031 050339 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f7ba55600b8de1c) [213.167.225.68] EHLO 
20061031 050340 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f7ba55600b8de1c) [213.167.225.68] MAIL 
FROM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
20061031 050341 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f7ba55600b8de1c) [213.167.225.68] RCPT 
TO: <@qo:
20061031 050341 127.0.0.1   SMTPD () send error 10038
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] Mailformed Rcpt to

[David Gregg]

Has anyone experienced problems with malformed headers to where it locks 
up the SMTP service on imail (8.15)

Below is a snippet for examples
20061031 050336 127.0.0.1   SMTPD (1f76899300b24995) [213.167.225.68] 
RCPT TO:

<@qo:
20061031 050336 127.0.0.1   SMTPD () send error 10038


This is the reuslt of an exploiut that has been discussed over the past 
several days.  In order to be protected from this, you should update to 8.22 
and also apply the smtpptotocol.dll fix provided by ipswitch.


David Gregg
--
mxGuard for IMail
The no-nonsense antispam and antivirus solution.

Download a free 30-day trial at
http://www.mxguard.com/postmaster/freetrial.asp
--


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Web Mail size

[Miguel Benavente]

Thank you Bill. 
I will try it.

Regards,

Miguel

On 31 Oct 2006 at 13:37, Bill Foresman wrote:

> 
> If you're running 2006 which is written in straight asp then you might 
> benefit from Port80's 
> software called ZipEnable (IIS 6) or HttpZip (IIS5). It turns on IIS' 
> built-in compression which will 
> greatly reduce the bandwidth used.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Bill
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: "Miguel Benavente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent 10/31/2006 8:23:36 AM
> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
> Subject: [IMail Forum] Web Mail size
> 
> Does someone know how to reduce the volume of the webmail?. 
> I have verified that the access to the web mail supposes more than 600 kb and 
> it supposes a 
> problem in occasions. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> 
> Miguel Benavente Barzana 
> 
>  
> CEMFI 
> Casado del Alisal, 5 
> 28014 Madrid 
> 
> http://www.cemfi.es/ 
> Tlf: (91) 429.05.51 
> E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>  
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List 
> Archive: http://www.mail-
> archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: 
> http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/ 


Miguel Benavente Barzana


CEMFI
Casado del Alisal, 5
28014 Madrid

http://www.cemfi.es/
Tlf: (91) 429.05.51
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Upgraded from 8.21 to 8.22, now POP3 won't work with SSL enabled...

[S.J.Stanaitis]

Morning All,

Did a quick look through the KB and the mailing list...no dice.  As I'm sure
I'm not the only one who did a quick upgrade to 8.22 lately, here's my
issue:

10:31 08:07 POP3D  (0001) server starting on port 110 of
ntmail.buildoffice.com
10:31 08:07 POP3D  (0001) server starting on port 995 of
ntmail.buildoffice.com
10:31 08:07 POP3D  (0001) failed to bind socket (10048)
 Non-SSL List

Can't imagine what else would be hanging out on port 995 to cause this
error.  I disabled SSL and the POP3D loaded fine.  Under 8.21 it loaded fine
with SSL.  Anyone have an idea?  Haven't tried rebooting the server just
yet...

Thanks,
Sam

SJ.Stanaitis - Network Administrator
Decorative Product Source E-commerce Network


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Web Mail size

[Miguel Benavente]

Does someone know how to reduce the volume of the webmail?.




I have verified that the access to the web mail supposes more than 600 kb 
and it supposes a problem in occasions.











Thanks,


















Miguel Benavente Barzana
















CEMFI




Casado del Alisal, 5




28014 Madrid











http://www.cemfi.es/




Tlf: (91) 429.05.51




E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]








To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] Web Mail size

[Bill Foresman]

If you're running 2006 which is written in straight asp then you might benefit from Port80's software called ZipEnable (IIS 6) or HttpZip (IIS5). It turns on IIS' built-in compression which will greatly reduce the bandwidth used.Regards,Bill-Original Message-From: "Miguel Benavente" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/31/2006 8:23:36 AMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: [IMail Forum] Web Mail size








Does someone know how to reduce the volume of the webmail?.




I have verified that the access to the web mail supposes more than 600 kb 
and it supposes a problem in occasions.











Thanks,


















Miguel Benavente Barzana
















CEMFI




Casado del Alisal, 5




28014 Madrid











http://www.cemfi.es/




Tlf: (91) 429.05.51




E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]






To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

[IMail Forum] Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue

[Bill Foresman]

No difference as far as browsers go on login, Tripp.-Original Message-From: "Matrosity Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent 10/30/2006 10:38:50 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueSo where do we go from here? You reproduced it, upgraded to 2006.2 (no ideawhy that was done since I can't run it) and now what?Bill ForesmanMatrosity Hostingwww.matrosity.com850.656.2644-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp AllenSent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:21 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueWe went back to the originals.Tripp-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave DohertySent: Monday, October 30, 2006 1:32 PMTo: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comSubject: Re: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issueMaybe a new registry entry that has some effect on the earlier versions?Tripp, when you did the subsequent trials, did you use Bill's originalregistry settings or the ones from the test server?-d- Original Message -From: "Matrosity Hosting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:53 PMSubject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> There must be something that .2 changes that isn't reversed by > downgrading.>>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:50 PM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> It's not quite ready for the technical preview yet, but we're getting > close.>>> Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:38 PM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> Dare I try .2?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:34 PM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> We loaded your registry on a test box with 2006.1 and reproduced the > problem on that test box.  Then we upgraded IMail on that machine to a > development> 2006.2 build and the problem went away. We then downgraded the box > back to> 2006.1 and the problem did not return.  Since then we've been unable > to duplicate again on that box.  I've tried three other machines with > your registry and could not duplicate. Still looking...>> Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:25 PM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> We could live without the disk indicator if that improves login speed. > It seems to me that there must be something in the registry that is > causing this since you guys were able to reproduce on your end?>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 12:20 PM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> The code that generates the control is compiled "code behind" for the > site.> So far I haven't found anything that we can comment out in the .js or > .aspx pages that would make a difference.>> Tripp>>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matrosity > Hosting> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:39 AM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> Can we temporarily disable the disk indicator by commenting out some code?>>> Bill Foresman> Matrosity Hosting> www.matrosity.com> 850.656.2644>> -Original Message-> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tripp Allen> Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:29 AM> To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] 2006.1 slow web logon issue>> Is there any difference in the login delay if they are using FF or IE?  > Is the disk space indicator displayed during the delay?>> Tripp> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html> List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html> List Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/>>> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html> List Archi

Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22

[Dave Doherty]

OK, I'll try that. Thanks!

-d

- Original Message - 
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2006 6:55 AM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22




Checking the box and restarting will make the queue manager will clean up 
the orphans as they are created; it will not go back and clean up the ones 
that are already there.  We have a command line utility that you can use 
to clean up files in the spool directory called isplcln.exe.


Tripp

- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22


I'm having a similar problem with 2006. I currently have about 500 Q*.GSE 
not matching Q*.SMD with a total of about 800 files in the spool. Most 
appear to be NDRs. On 8.15 I was seeing about 80-100 file sin the spool, 
so this is a major difference for me.


Max retries for null senders = 10

The delete box was not checked.  I checked it and restarted SMTP and then 
Queue Manager, with no effect.


This is a clean installation of 2006, with the registry keys and domain 
contents copied over from 8.15.


-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
508-425-7176
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





- Original Message - 
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22




10 is fine. The reason I asked is you have a lot of D files that don't 
have corresponding Q files.  This normally means that messages are 
bouncing, but the bounce message could not be delivered and was 
orphaned. If this setting is checked and the queue manager has been 
restarted since you turned it on it should delete those D files when it 
can't deliver the message.


Tripp

- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22



Yes.  Set at the default of 10.  Should I lower this?

Brian

-- Original Message --
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Date:  Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:50:07 -0500

Do you have the delete option set for messages that hit max tries with 
Null senders?


Tripp

 - Original Message - 
 From: Brian T.

 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:59 PM
 Subject: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22


 Ever since upgrading to Imail 8.22 and installing the fix for the SMTP 
vulnerability I have had several problems pop up.


 At this moment my spool contains roughtly 1400 files.  1300 "D" files 
and 100 "Q" or "T" files.  Any else seen this?


 A lot of these "D" files are .gse files that appear to be messages 
from the postmaster with the subject of Undeliverable Mail.


  Any know how I can delete these automatically?

 I tried setting up an Outbound rule but it does not appear to be 
catching anything.


 Thanks in advance.

 Brian T.

 P.S. Also I disabled the built in AntiSpam, yet when I looked at the 
log, it has a line " running antispam checks" for each message.  How 
can I verify that I do have the built in antispam disabled?










Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22

[Tripp Allen]

Checking the box and restarting will make the queue manager will clean up 
the orphans as they are created; it will not go back and clean up the ones 
that are already there.  We have a command line utility that you can use to 
clean up files in the spool directory called isplcln.exe.


Tripp

- Original Message - 
From: "Dave Doherty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22


I'm having a similar problem with 2006. I currently have about 500 Q*.GSE 
not matching Q*.SMD with a total of about 800 files in the spool. Most 
appear to be NDRs. On 8.15 I was seeing about 80-100 file sin the spool, 
so this is a major difference for me.


Max retries for null senders = 10

The delete box was not checked.  I checked it and restarted SMTP and then 
Queue Manager, with no effect.


This is a clean installation of 2006, with the registry keys and domain 
contents copied over from 8.15.


-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, Inc.
508-425-7176
[EMAIL PROTECTED]





- Original Message - 
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:24 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22




10 is fine. The reason I asked is you have a lot of D files that don't 
have corresponding Q files.  This normally means that messages are 
bouncing, but the bounce message could not be delivered and was orphaned. 
If this setting is checked and the queue manager has been restarted since 
you turned it on it should delete those D files when it can't deliver the 
message.


Tripp

- Original Message - 
From: "Brian Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

To: 
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 9:15 PM
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22



Yes.  Set at the default of 10.  Should I lower this?

Brian

-- Original Message --
From: "Tripp Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
Date:  Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:50:07 -0500

Do you have the delete option set for messages that hit max tries with 
Null senders?


Tripp

 - Original Message - 
 From: Brian T.

 To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com
 Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:59 PM
 Subject: [IMail Forum] Problems after upgrading to Imail 8.22


 Ever since upgrading to Imail 8.22 and installing the fix for the SMTP 
vulnerability I have had several problems pop up.


 At this moment my spool contains roughtly 1400 files.  1300 "D" files 
and 100 "Q" or "T" files.  Any else seen this?


 A lot of these "D" files are .gse files that appear to be messages from 
the postmaster with the subject of Undeliverable Mail.


  Any know how I can delete these automatically?

 I tried setting up an Outbound rule but it does not appear to be 
catching anything.


 Thanks in advance.

 Brian T.

 P.S. Also I disabled the built in AntiSpam, yet when I looked at the 
log, it has a line " running antispam checks" for each message.  How can 
I verify that I do have the built in antispam disabled?










Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/

Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/




To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Re: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOW

[Bonno Bloksma]

Hi Andy,
 

  We even were considering scripting the "lower case translate" - but, 
  "keyrename" is not a scriptable registry function. We certainly don't want 
  tomanually perform all these edits while the services have to be down AND 
  riskthat there'll be a certain percent of keyboard errors causing 
  who-knows-whatkind of secondary problems.
If you just export the Ipswitch key to a text file, 
do simple textbased case replacement and import it, that should not take to 
long. 
 


Met vriendelijke groet,Bonno Bloksmahoofd systeembeheer
tio hogeschool hotelmanagement en toerisme 
begijnenhof 8-12 / 5611 el eindhovent 040 296 28 
28 / f 040 237 35 20[EMAIL PROTECTED]  / www.tio.nl 


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Andy Schmidt 
  To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.com 
  
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 11:45 
  PM
  Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] SMTP Exploit 
  Scanning Going on NOW
  KG>> Can you share what the main issues are that you'd 
  like to see resolvedbefore upgrading to 2006.1? <Subject: 
  RE: [IMail Forum]  SMTP Exploit Scanning Going on NOWDate: Fri, 27 
  Oct 2006 01:51:20 -0400Reply-To: Imail_Forum@list.ipswitch.comHi 
  Darin,Can you share what the main issues are that you'd like to see 
  resolvedbefore upgrading to 2006.1?  Chances are that others may 
  share similarsentiments and we'd like to prioritize and address 
  them.Bye for now,kg To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.htmlList 
  Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/Knowledge 
  Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/