Re: Connecting to a CVS-server on port *2402*

2001-01-11 Thread Bill Whiting

Torben,
If you want to setup multiple pserver processes on a single
host and access each one, then the patch to allow
CVS_CLIENT_PORT will be necessary.

If you only want to change the port used from the default,
then change the port for cvspserver in /etc/services.  The
clients, and inetd will resolve the mapping from there.

//Bill

"Derek R. Price" wrote:
 
 Unfortunately, with versions of CVS 1.11 and earlier your
 only option is to patch, change the port pserver is
 assigned to in your /etc/services file or whatever it is
 under AIX that you have to do to get a different result
 from getservbyname, or compile a version of CVS after
 changing the value of CVS_AUTH_PORT in src/client.c.
 Unfortunately, except for the patch, you are still stuck
 with the same alternative port every time.
 
 There _is_ an even better fix if you feel like downloading
 the dev version of the source from the CVS repository.  It
 allows you to specify an alternative port as part of
 CVSROOT.  There's a small issue yet with the treatment of
 the password file, but it's no show stopper and I should
 have it fixed in another day or two.  Of course, you'll
 still have to compile that.
 
 Derek
 
 --
 Derek Price  CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
 --
 ... one of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that,
 lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C
 programs.
 
 - Robert Firth
 
 Christensen Torben Bach wrote:
 
  Thanks, Derek!
 
  But I still wonder if configuring-by-patching really is
  necessary?
 
  I quote from Karl Fogel's CVS-book:
 
  "Before running through the steps needed to set up the
  password server,
  let's examine how such connections work in the abstract.
  When a remote CVS
  client uses the :pserver: method to connect to a
  repository, the client is
  actually contacting a specific port number on the server
  machine -
  specifically, port number 2401 (which is 49 squared, if
  you like that sort
  of thing). Port 2401 is the designated default port for
  the CVS pserver,
  although one could arrange for a different port to be
  used as long as both
  client and server agree on it. "
 
  Sadly, KF doesn't reveal HOW to arrange it...
 
  /Torben
 
   -Original Message-
   From: Derek Scherger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
   Sent: 11. januar 2001 02:49
   To: Torben B. Christensen
   Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: Connecting to a CVS-server on port *2402*
 
  
  
   "Torben B. Christensen" wrote:
   
Hi there!
   
All the manuals seems to assume that port 2401 is
  always used for a
pserver connection. Well, not on our AIX-box...
   
So, how do I connect to an alternate port? I know
  from our WinCvs
clients that it can be done, but how do I persuade
  the
   standard UNIX-
client? My best guess would be changing the CVSROOT
  - just can't
figure out how...
   
/Torben B. Christensen
   
___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
  
   There's a patch floating around that allows you to
  export
   CVS_CLIENT_PORT=2402 before running the client that
  I've used
   with some
   success. I've attached the copy I've used which works
  against CVS
   1.10.x. If I remember right this is from Derek Price
  at Open Ave.
  
   --
   Cheers,
   Derek
  
  _
 
   Derek Scherger Echologic
  Software Corporation
   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  http://www.echologic.com

___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs



Re: CVS For VMS

2001-01-09 Thread Bill Whiting

Rex,
I would like a copy of the source, or patches for VMS.

//Bill

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 Nobody's contributed a binary for OpenVMS since 1.9.27, so if you need
 anything more recent you'll probably have to do some porting work yourself.
 That may or may not be a big deal.
 
 I can compile 1.11 (client only) under OpenVMS 7.2 if anyone is interested.  We
 also have local modifications to support vms wildcard filespecs if interested.
 Those interested send me mail or post to list and if there is interest perhaps i
 can send the binary to someone at openave for hosting.  I can try to compile the
 server side, but I havent yet done so.
 
 Rex.
 
 ___
 Info-cvs mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs



Re: question about :local: access to repository on Windows box (USERNAME -- ?)

2001-01-09 Thread Bill Whiting

True, but if there are file permissions (there won't be for
Win3.11, but will be for WinNT, if it's Win9x, then I think
it's possible to circumvent any local file permissions),
then the access to the CVS repository is based on the file
permissions.

//Bill
Michael Peck wrote:
 
 I'm not exactly sure what you mean here.  If the repos is :local:, then
 it's not possible to log in.  Period.
 
 If you want to track who is using it, as you had in the subject,
 %USERNAME% works as long as the user actually logged in (problem for
 Win9x, because they don't require login).
 
 After that, you put correct permissions on the repository so that only
 allowed people have access.  I guess that's the closest thing to a login
 when using :local:.
 
 If this isn't what you meant, then please explain again.
 
 Mike
 
 "X.X." wrote:
 
  Hello everybody.
 
  I'm sorry, but i have not found yet an answer to one important
  question: how one can log in with personal user_name to the `:local:'
  repository. It's so important, because we will keep the repository
  under Windows (not on UNIX box).
 
  If you have any idea or a "how to" link, write me, please.
  Thank you
 
  Best regards, Alexei Lyubimov
 
  PS: It seems, that in Cederqvist it is nothing about too :(
 
 
 ___
 Info-cvs mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs

___
Info-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs