Re: Annotate binary files...
Am Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:04:46 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Larry Jones: Andreas Volz writes: A! Perhaps I found the problem. I used another CVS server from another project. And there is works with binary files! Is the annotate version and binary stuff of the CVS *server* and not the CVS client a problem here? I'm not able to log in with a ssh server. Is it possible to get the CVS server version that I use with a client? Yes, that's the problem. The CVS client does very little processing, almost everything is done on the server. You can display both the client and server versions by using ``cvs version'' (not --version). The problematic server is running CVS 1.11.1p1, which is positively ancient and predates the change to avoid annotating binary files. Thanks it was version 1.11.1p1. I'll ask the admin to install a newer CVS version. Is there a list of security problems that this version has? Perhaps I need some arguments... Andreas ___ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Annotate binary files...
Hello Andreas, * On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:39:53AM +0200 Andreas Volz wrote: Am Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:27:04 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Larry Jones: It should. What does ``cvs status'' say about the problem files? cvs status works without problems. What does cvs status tell about the status of the binary files? Are these really tagged as -kb? Best regards, Spiro. -- Spiro R. Trikaliotis http://cbm4win.sf.net/ http://www.trikaliotis.net/ http://www.viceteam.org/ ___ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Annotate binary files...
Am Sun, 24 Apr 2005 09:38:23 +0200 schrieb Spiro Trikaliotis: Hello Andreas, * On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 12:39:53AM +0200 Andreas Volz wrote: Am Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:27:04 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Larry Jones: It should. What does ``cvs status'' say about the problem files? cvs status works without problems. What does cvs status tell about the status of the binary files? Are these really tagged as -kb? Yes, all binary files (jpg, blend and zip) are marked with -kb. You could see it yourself if you checkout the CVS repository I wrote in my last mail. I tried the option -F to see what happened and here is the result: ( I appended also the output to this mail) cvs annotate -F cvs server: invalid option -- F Usage: cvs server [-lRf] [-r rev] [-D date] [files...] -l Local directory only, no recursion. -R Process directories recursively. -f Use head revision if tag/date not found. -r rev Annotate file as of specified revision/tag. -D date Annotate file as of specified date. (Specify the --help global option for a list of other help options) cvs --version Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.11.18 (client/server) A! Perhaps I found the problem. I used another CVS server from another project. And there is works with binary files! Is the annotate version and binary stuff of the CVS *server* and not the CVS client a problem here? I'm not able to log in with a ssh server. Is it possible to get the CVS server version that I use with a client? I think in this case the CVS server should be updated. regards Andreas makeh.status Description: Binary data ___ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Annotate binary files...
Andreas Volz writes: A! Perhaps I found the problem. I used another CVS server from another project. And there is works with binary files! Is the annotate version and binary stuff of the CVS *server* and not the CVS client a problem here? I'm not able to log in with a ssh server. Is it possible to get the CVS server version that I use with a client? Yes, that's the problem. The CVS client does very little processing, almost everything is done on the server. You can display both the client and server versions by using ``cvs version'' (not --version). The problematic server is running CVS 1.11.1p1, which is positively ancient and predates the change to avoid annotating binary files. -Larry Jones The game's called on account of sudden death. -- Calvin ___ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Annotate binary files...
Andreas Volz writes: I had problems if I use cvs annotate in my project, because there are some binary files in the CVS. I marked the binary files with -kb. I think it should ignore binary files by default. It should. What does ``cvs status'' say about the problem files? -Larry Jones Apparently I was misinformed. -- Calvin ___ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
Re: Annotate binary files...
Am Sat, 23 Apr 2005 17:27:04 -0400 (EDT) schrieb Larry Jones: Andreas Volz writes: I had problems if I use cvs annotate in my project, because there are some binary files in the CVS. I marked the binary files with -kb. I think it should ignore binary files by default. It should. What does ``cvs status'' say about the problem files? cvs status works without problems. I tested the annotate command with some of my CVS checkouts and got this problem. Here is one that has problems: (I've also problems with the developer checkout) cvs -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/makeh login cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/makeh co makeh cd makeh cvs annotate I get lot of binary trash on my console. Do you get another result? regards Andreas ___ Info-cvs mailing list Info-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-cvs
