installsieve doesn't work
Hi, the routine "installsieve" of IMAP 2.0.9 doesn't seem to work properly. Here is what I get when calling it : Susanne:/usr/src/cyrus-imapd-2.0.9/installsieve # ./installsieve -l susanne asking for 16385 Username: cyrus asking for 16386 Segmentation fault Susanne:/usr/src/cyrus-imapd-2.0.9/installsieve # The same occurs when called with user and password like "./installsieve -l -u cyrus -w password susanne", so I guess it ignores the commandline parameters. Did anybody work through this before or is there a newer version ? (I checked with 2.0.11 : the same result). My installation consists of Suse 7.0, IMAP 2.0.9, SASL 1.5.24, BerkeleyDB3.1.17. As I guess the programm was asking for a password, it may be a problem with the sasl library. Does installsieve require its own .conf file for sasl in /usr/local/lib/sasl like imapd.conf ? Finally, how does one install sieve scripts manually ? Many thanks ... Michael
Re: non duplicate mail delivery
All the stuff about duplicates, and duplicate suppression can be real confusing, and so let me try and straighten some of it out. In the sendmail world, duplicate delivery supression means that a single message wont be delivered multiple times to the same addressee. Thus, if I mail to two aliases on the same system, and these aliases are really exploder lists, and your in both lists, you won't get two copies. In Cyrus, duplicate delivery suppression is really single instance store, meaning if a message is received for 50 people at your site, the message will only be written to disk once, and there will be 50 hard links (all 50 copies of the message will be the same inode, meaning really only one copy). What your talking about is a case where, as in this reply, I am mailing to the discussion list and CC'ing you. Two separate mail message arrive at your machine. If you look at the headers, they are different. One went directly from my mail server to yours. The other came to you from the listserv at cmu.edu. As far as sendmail and as far as cyrus-imapd are concerned, those are two separate messages, and duplicate suppression does not apply. Hope that helps. -- Rob --On Friday, February 02, 2001 09:58:54 PM +0100 Timo Pröscholdt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Cyrus Users, > > many questions from me these days. I hope > not to beginn to go on your nerves. > > Today my problem is the following. Mail which is sent to me twice, > example a reply mail from one of you answering me, send > directly to me and a cc to the list which i am subscribed > to, reaches me only one time. It is delivered to my INBOX > but the mail is mising in my (sieve filtered) > info-cyrus-mailbox where all the other mails from the list > appear. > I read about the Duplicate Delivery Suppression feature > of cyrus but im not sure if that is the point because mail > from me to multiple persons on this mailserver (same partition) > reaches each of the recipients, while a mail from: me to: me cc: me > reaches me only one time! > > Im running cyrus 2.07 on, linux 2.2.14 > > feature or bug > > greetings > timo proescholdt > > _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ /\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\ /\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT, /\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR /\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/ /\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin \/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound) Rob Tanner UNIX and Networks Manager Linfield College, McMinnville OR (503) 434-2558 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 02:38:46 +0900 (JST) From: Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ($B2V1c(B) In 2.0.9, unlimit_fds() was defined but it was never used. In 2.0.11, limit_fds() that is rewrite version of unlimit_fds() is activated. This causes the problem at least under FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE. So, I put following patch for workaround and it's working: Can you explain why limit_fds() doesn't work under FreeBSD? This is the first report I've had of that. I hear from my friend that there is same problem on his Solaris8 box. Our production service runs on Solaris 7 and needs this (otherwise we will run out of fds.) When I had been working on merging my IPv6 support code for 2.0.9 into 2.0.11, I met this problem. But, this problem also occurs with plain 2.0.11. There are my IPv6 patch and FreeBSD port of 2.0.11: IPv6 patch: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11-ipv6-20010201.diff.gz http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-sasl-1.5.24-ipv6-20001226.diff.gz cyrus-imapd 2.0.11 FreeBSD port: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-port-20010201.tar.gz About a month ago, I sent my IPv6 patch for 2.0.9 to [EMAIL PROTECTED] But, I have never hear any response. Is cyrus guys actually read the report? Or, don't they interest in IPv6 support? We're vaguely interested in it; I just haven't had the time to evaluate it and figure out how much additional work this would create for me to maintain. Larry
non duplicate mail delivery
Hi Cyrus Users, many questions from me these days. I hope not to beginn to go on your nerves. Today my problem is the following. Mail which is sent to me twice, example a reply mail from one of you answering me, send directly to me and a cc to the list which i am subscribed to, reaches me only one time. It is delivered to my INBOX but the mail is mising in my (sieve filtered) info-cyrus-mailbox where all the other mails from the list appear. I read about the Duplicate Delivery Suppression feature of cyrus but im not sure if that is the point because mail from me to multiple persons on this mailserver (same partition) reaches each of the recipients, while a mail from: me to: me cc: me reaches me only one time! Im running cyrus 2.07 on, linux 2.2.14 feature or bug greetings timo proescholdt
Re: imap ssl imtest mulberry
-- Simon Loader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi simon, > >> THREAD=ORDEREDSUBJECT STARTTLS >> S: C01 OK Completed >> S01 OK Begin TLS negotiation now >> verify error:num=18:self signed certificate >> TLS connection established: TLSv1 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA >> (168/168 bits) >> C: C01 CAPABILITY > > Prehaps it does not like the self signed CERT > Or it can not handle the error that is returned ??? i think imtest should, this test scenario is described as working in many help files over the internet. > Umm Does mulberry give a warning about this ? > Shouldnt it do so ? mulberry gives one. It tells about a selfsigned certificate, but there is a ability to continue. greetings timo
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
I have a 64 bit S8 machine running 2.0.11 with no problem. Its been up
since the announcement and I've had no issues with imapd.
len
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:44:38 -0500
> > Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> leg+> I've just put version 2.0.11 on the ftp site; it's mostly an
> leg+> accumulation of small bugfixes since 2.0.9 and is very similiar to
> leg+> what we're running in production on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.
>
> leg+> We now consider the 2.0 line production quality code.
>
> Is it actually working?
> 1st time, the connection is accepted. But, 2nd time, master wouldn't
> accept any connections.
> When imapd, pop3d or something is invoked, MASTER_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
> is notified to master via pipe. However, master wouldn't hear this
> message. As the result, once child process is invoked,
> s->ready_workers has non zero value and it wouldn't back to zero.
> Then master becomes never listen for connections.
> In 2.0.9, unlimit_fds() was defined but it was never used. In 2.0.11,
> limit_fds() that is rewrite version of unlimit_fds() is activated.
> This causes the problem at least under FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE.
> So, I put following patch for workaround and it's working:
>
> Index: master/master.c
> diff -u master/master.c.orig master/master.c
> --- master/master.c.orig Tue Jan 30 06:53:26 2001
> +++ master/master.c Fri Feb 2 05:48:48 2001
> @@ -969,7 +969,9 @@
> }
> }
>
> +#ifndef __FreeBSD__
> limit_fds(RLIM_INFINITY);
> +#endif
>
> /* zero out the children table */
> memset(&ctable, 0, sizeof(struct centry *) * child_table_size);
>
>
> I hear from my friend that there is same problem on his Solaris8 box.
>
> When I had been working on merging my IPv6 support code for 2.0.9 into
> 2.0.11, I met this problem. But, this problem also occurs with plain
> 2.0.11.
> There are my IPv6 patch and FreeBSD port of 2.0.11:
>
> IPv6 patch:
> http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11-ipv6-20010201.diff.gz
> http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-sasl-1.5.24-ipv6-20001226.diff.gz
> cyrus-imapd 2.0.11 FreeBSD port:
> http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-port-20010201.tar.gz
>
> About a month ago, I sent my IPv6 patch for 2.0.9 to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] But, I have never hear any response. Is
> cyrus guys actually read the report? Or, don't they interest in IPv6
> support?
>
> --
> Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
> http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
>
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
Hi,
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:44:38 -0500
> Lawrence Greenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
leg+> I've just put version 2.0.11 on the ftp site; it's mostly an
leg+> accumulation of small bugfixes since 2.0.9 and is very similiar to
leg+> what we're running in production on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu.
leg+> We now consider the 2.0 line production quality code.
Is it actually working?
1st time, the connection is accepted. But, 2nd time, master wouldn't
accept any connections.
When imapd, pop3d or something is invoked, MASTER_SERVICE_UNAVAILABLE
is notified to master via pipe. However, master wouldn't hear this
message. As the result, once child process is invoked,
s->ready_workers has non zero value and it wouldn't back to zero.
Then master becomes never listen for connections.
In 2.0.9, unlimit_fds() was defined but it was never used. In 2.0.11,
limit_fds() that is rewrite version of unlimit_fds() is activated.
This causes the problem at least under FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE.
So, I put following patch for workaround and it's working:
Index: master/master.c
diff -u master/master.c.orig master/master.c
--- master/master.c.origTue Jan 30 06:53:26 2001
+++ master/master.c Fri Feb 2 05:48:48 2001
@@ -969,7 +969,9 @@
}
}
+#ifndef __FreeBSD__
limit_fds(RLIM_INFINITY);
+#endif
/* zero out the children table */
memset(&ctable, 0, sizeof(struct centry *) * child_table_size);
I hear from my friend that there is same problem on his Solaris8 box.
When I had been working on merging my IPv6 support code for 2.0.9 into
2.0.11, I met this problem. But, this problem also occurs with plain
2.0.11.
There are my IPv6 patch and FreeBSD port of 2.0.11:
IPv6 patch:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11-ipv6-20010201.diff.gz
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-sasl-1.5.24-ipv6-20001226.diff.gz
cyrus-imapd 2.0.11 FreeBSD port:
http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/ipv6/cyrus-port-20010201.tar.gz
About a month ago, I sent my IPv6 patch for 2.0.9 to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] But, I have never hear any response. Is
cyrus guys actually read the report? Or, don't they interest in IPv6
support?
--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/
Re: mailboxes.db
From: "jean-marc delpech" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > how can I recreate the /var/imap/mailboxes.db ? > I know I can recover the databases after a crash but if > I would like to recreate it, is it possible. > In fact the pb is that some body create a folder with cyradm, > but after somebody else delete this user directly on the hard > drive. Every body can see this forlder but it doesn't exist > really ... > In Cyrus 1.5 - 1.6 you used "reconstruct -r" to rebuild the mailboxes files. For 2.0.x, I believe this is currently broken for the mailboxes.db file. What you will need to do is dumb the mailboxes.db file to a file and then edit that file to remove the deleted folder. 1. Run ctl_mboxlist -d > mboxlist.temp to dump existing mailboxes. 2. Remove mailboxes.db file: rm mailboxes.db 3. Edit mboxlist.temp to remove the folder 4. Run ctl_mboxlist -u < mboxlist.temp to change the contents of mailboxes.db. Scot
mailboxes.db
Hi all, how can I recreate the /var/imap/mailboxes.db ? I know I can recover the databases after a crash but if I would like to recreate it, is it possible. In fact the pb is that some body create a folder with cyradm, but after somebody else delete this user directly on the hard drive. Every body can see this forlder but it doesn't exist really ... Thks for yr help. Jean-Marc
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
At least be assured that I wasn't suggesting you were guilty of anything I havn't ever been guilty of (What!! Me?) Okay, since what you're describing makes absolutely not sense at all (otherwise the two of us wouldn't be so darned confused), let me pose another stupid question: are you sure you're going to the localhost and not to another machine? And let me pursue this one step further. If you login all the way, and than take a look at the imapd log file, does it record that login? I'm just kind of taking wild guesses and thinking about the things I might look at if I were having the problem. One of the things that occurs to me (but, of course, it depends on your total setup) is that maybe there's some sort of network confusion going on. What I don't know about your setup is whether you have more that one IMAP server machine. And I don't know whether you're using imtest or telneting. And I don't know whether you're using hostnames or IP addresses, etc. Especially if you don't have a log entry showing that you successfully logged in, I'd start looking elsewhere for the problem (or maybe decide to call it a day). One other thing to check -- if you kill the 2.0.11 master process, can you connect to either ports 110 or 143. If you can, than obviously something else wierd is going on. -- Rob --On Friday, February 02, 2001 01:19:59 AM -0500 Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > yes, of course i killed the old process and not once already ;) > i am pretty damn sure that I start the new "master" and yet it > reports on connection that it is 2.0.9 > the version.h has 2.0.11 > i am confused myself > > - Original Message - > From: "Rob Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ilya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 12:24 AM > Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released > > >> Am I missing something, or do you mean the report says your still >> using 2.0.9? Otherwise I'm confused. Assuming you do mean 2.0.9, >> di you terminate the old master process before firing up the new? >> Since I haven't started playing with 2.0.11 yet, the other thing I >> wonder is whether the version id got updated? Look in the imap >> source directory for the version.h header file. Does the >> _CYRUS_VERSION macro say "v2.0.9" or "v2.0.11"? I believe that's >> where the banner text comes from. >> >> -- Rob >> >> >> --On Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:23:35 PM -0500 Ilya >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > I just downloaded 2.0.11, compiled 2.0.11, moved 2.09 cyrus to >> > different directory, make install 2.0.11 >> > but hwne I connecto to 110 or 143 I get report that it is still >> > 2.0.11 running!!! >> > I ran manually master from new compiled 2.0.11 folder - same >> > results. I dont have anything in inetd.conf for mail, all is >> > handled by master. any suggestions? >> > >> > - Original Message - >> > From: "Lawrence Greenfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:44 PM >> > Subject: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released >> > >> > >> >> I've just put version 2.0.11 on the ftp site; it's mostly an >> >> accumulation of small bugfixes since 2.0.9 and is very similiar to >> >> what we're running in production on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu. >> >> >> >> We now consider the 2.0 line production quality code. >> >> >> >> Download Cyrus imapd at: >> >> ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11.tar. >> >> gz >> >> >> >> Comments/bugs/etc to: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> or to the info-cyrus mailing list at: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> join via: >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Larry Greenfield >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >>_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ >> /\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\ >> /\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM >> SIT, /\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR >>/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/ >> /\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin >> \/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound) >> >> Rob Tanner >> UNIX and Networks Manager >> Linfield College, McMinnville OR >> (503) 434-2558 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ /\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\ /\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT, /\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR /\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/ /\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin \/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound) Rob Tanner UNIX and Networks Manager Linfield College, McMinnville OR (503) 434-2558 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
Oh, you answered my previous post before I posted it. I'm glad you found it -- we can both get unconfused now. -- Rob --On Friday, February 02, 2001 01:43:38 AM -0500 Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > uups, sorry about it. 2.09 was installed in two places. > but 2.11 doesnt start. I installed ucs-snm-4.2 for it to compile > properly. but during start it look for file I dont have: > ./master > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libucdagent.la" not found > > - Original Message - > From: "Ilya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:23 PM > Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released > > >> I just downloaded 2.0.11, compiled 2.0.11, moved 2.09 cyrus to >> different directory, make install 2.0.11 >> but hwne I connecto to 110 or 143 I get report that it is still >> 2.0.11 running!!! >> I ran manually master from new compiled 2.0.11 folder - same >> results. I > dont >> have anything in inetd.conf for mail, all is handled by master. any >> suggestions? >> >> - Original Message - >> From: "Lawrence Greenfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:44 PM >> Subject: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released >> >> >> > I've just put version 2.0.11 on the ftp site; it's mostly an >> > accumulation of small bugfixes since 2.0.9 and is very similiar to >> > what we're running in production on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu. >> > >> > We now consider the 2.0 line production quality code. >> > >> > Download Cyrus imapd at: >> > ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11.tar.gz >> > >> > Comments/bugs/etc to: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > or to the info-cyrus mailing list at: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > join via: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Larry Greenfield >> > >> > >> >> > _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ /\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\ /\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT, /\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR /\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/ /\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin \/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound) Rob Tanner UNIX and Networks Manager Linfield College, McMinnville OR (503) 434-2558 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
uups, sorry about it. 2.09 was installed in two places. but 2.11 doesnt start. I installed ucs-snm-4.2 for it to compile properly. but during start it look for file I dont have: ./master /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libucdagent.la" not found - Original Message - From: "Ilya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:23 PM Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released > I just downloaded 2.0.11, compiled 2.0.11, moved 2.09 cyrus to different > directory, make install 2.0.11 > but hwne I connecto to 110 or 143 I get report that it is still 2.0.11 > running!!! > I ran manually master from new compiled 2.0.11 folder - same results. I dont > have anything in inetd.conf for mail, all is handled by master. any > suggestions? > > - Original Message - > From: "Lawrence Greenfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:44 PM > Subject: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released > > > > I've just put version 2.0.11 on the ftp site; it's mostly an > > accumulation of small bugfixes since 2.0.9 and is very similiar to > > what we're running in production on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu. > > > > We now consider the 2.0 line production quality code. > > > > Download Cyrus imapd at: > > ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11.tar.gz > > > > Comments/bugs/etc to: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > or to the info-cyrus mailing list at: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > join via: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Thanks, > > Larry Greenfield > > > > > >
Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released
yes, of course i killed the old process and not once already ;) i am pretty damn sure that I start the new "master" and yet it reports on connection that it is 2.0.9 the version.h has 2.0.11 i am confused myself - Original Message - From: "Rob Tanner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ilya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 12:24 AM Subject: Re: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released > Am I missing something, or do you mean the report says your still using > 2.0.9? Otherwise I'm confused. Assuming you do mean 2.0.9, di you > terminate the old master process before firing up the new? Since I > haven't started playing with 2.0.11 yet, the other thing I wonder is > whether the version id got updated? Look in the imap source directory > for the version.h header file. Does the _CYRUS_VERSION macro say > "v2.0.9" or "v2.0.11"? I believe that's where the banner text comes > from. > > -- Rob > > > --On Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:23:35 PM -0500 Ilya > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I just downloaded 2.0.11, compiled 2.0.11, moved 2.09 cyrus to > > different directory, make install 2.0.11 > > but hwne I connecto to 110 or 143 I get report that it is still 2.0.11 > > running!!! > > I ran manually master from new compiled 2.0.11 folder - same results. > > I dont have anything in inetd.conf for mail, all is handled by > > master. any suggestions? > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Lawrence Greenfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 2:44 PM > > Subject: Cyrus IMAP 2.0.11 released > > > > > >> I've just put version 2.0.11 on the ftp site; it's mostly an > >> accumulation of small bugfixes since 2.0.9 and is very similiar to > >> what we're running in production on cyrus.andrew.cmu.edu. > >> > >> We now consider the 2.0 line production quality code. > >> > >> Download Cyrus imapd at: > >> ftp://ftp.andrew.cmu.edu/pub/cyrus-mail/cyrus-imapd-2.0.11.tar.gz > >> > >> Comments/bugs/etc to: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> or to the info-cyrus mailing list at: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> join via: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Larry Greenfield > >> > >> > > > > > > >_ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ > /\_\_\_\_\/\_\ /\_\_\_\_\_\ > /\/_/_/_/_/ /\/_/ \/_/_/_/_/_/ QUIDQUID LATINE DICTUM SIT, > /\/_/__\/_/ __/\/_//\/_/ PROFUNDUM VIDITUR >/\/_/_/_/_/ /\_\ /\/_//\/_/ > /\/_/ \/_/ /\/_/_/\/_//\/_/ (Whatever is said in Latin > \/_/ \/_/ \/_/_/_/_/ \/_/ appears profound) > > Rob Tanner > UNIX and Networks Manager > Linfield College, McMinnville OR > (503) 434-2558 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
