2.2 vs. 2.3?

[Karl Boyken]

We're running 2.2.12 in production here, but my impression from traffic 
on this list is that at least a few people are using 2.3, even though 
2.3 is a testing distribution.  Is that accurate?  Is 2.3 stable enough 
to use on a production mail server?  Thanks.


Karl Boyken

--
Karl Boyken, system administrator 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
303A MLH, Dept. of Comp. Sci. 
http://www.cs.uiowa.edu/~boyken/
The U. of Iowa, Iowa City, IA  52242   319-335-2730 (voice) 
319-335-3668 (fax)


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html

Re: 2.2 vs. 2.3?

[Wesley Craig]

On 31 Aug 2006, at 12:44, Karl Boyken wrote:
We're running 2.2.12 in production here, but my impression from  
traffic on this list is that at least a few people are using 2.3,  
even though 2.3 is a testing distribution.  Is that accurate?  Is  
2.3 stable enough to use on a production mail server?  Thanks.


We use 2.3 for backends in production at University of Michigan.  Our  
frontends and mupdate master are still running 2.2.  We also maintain  
a handful of local modifications.


:wes

Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html