Re: Draft: Bugzilla Work Flow
On 09/04/2010 07:41 AM, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: To allow some early feedback, I'm putting the page on the list now as opposed to when I feel like I'm done documenting everything in full ;-) http://www.cyrusimap.org/mediawiki/index.php/User:Jeroen_van_Meeuwen/Drafts/Bugzilla_Work_Flow This page is accessible, but what happened to the cyrus wiki? There seems to be a new web page for cyrus which doesn't appear very wiki-like (http://www.cyrusimap.org/), and googling only takes me to this page. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
Re: Draft: Bugzilla Work Flow
Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: Hello there, Nudging ;-) CC:'ing the info list as well. I'm working on a documented Bugzilla work flow, in an attempt to streamline how we all work with it and what the average consumer may or may not expect. To allow some early feedback, I'm putting the page on the list now as opposed to when I feel like I'm done documenting everything in full ;-) http://www.cyrusimap.org/mediawiki/index.php/User:Jeroen_van_Meeuwen/Drafts/Bugzilla_Work_Flow Please note that these would, in any case, be guidelines, not law. There's no intention to make anyone's life any more difficult ;-) The attempt is to document what mere mortals like myself, and those people that are on the reporting end of bugs might expect, and to allow new contributors like myself to read up on what is an agreeable approach to handling Bugzilla issues. -- Jeroen van Meeuwen Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com t: +316 42 801 403 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08 Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
Re: Draft: Bugzilla Work Flow
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: Jeroen van Meeuwen (Kolab Systems) wrote: Hello there, Nudging ;-) CC:'ing the info list as well. Sorry - didn't get a change to respond to this before! I'm working on a documented Bugzilla work flow, in an attempt to streamline how we all work with it and what the average consumer may or may not expect. To allow some early feedback, I'm putting the page on the list now as opposed to when I feel like I'm done documenting everything in full ;-) http://www.cyrusimap.org/mediawiki/index.php/User:Jeroen_van_Meeuwen/Drafts/Bugzilla_Work_Flow Please note that these would, in any case, be guidelines, not law. There's no intention to make anyone's life any more difficult ;-) The attempt is to document what mere mortals like myself, and those people that are on the reporting end of bugs might expect, and to allow new contributors like myself to read up on what is an agreeable approach to handling Bugzilla issues. That looks really good actually. I guess the side question is Is Bugzilla the ideal tool for this? I've seen setups where commit messages in the change management tool can be tied directly to tickets. It's probably not essential though - if we have a process and we all know how to follow it. Speaking of which - the auto bugzilla reminder emails are great :) Occasional annoyances that go away when you do the right thing are very useful. Bron. Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
Re: Draft: Bugzilla Work Flow
Bron Gondwana wrote: That looks really good actually. I guess the side question is Is Bugzilla the ideal tool for this? I've seen setups where commit messages in the change management tool can be tied directly to tickets. It's probably not essential though - if we have a process and we all know how to follow it. There's git-bugzilla for this purpose. I haven't actually worked with it though. There's also a python-bugzilla CLI client, which we could (possibly) use as a commit hook to update any tickets referred to in the commit message. Speaking of which - the auto bugzilla reminder emails are great :) Occasional annoyances that go away when you do the right thing are very useful. Yeah, so is the automagically put someone in CC: on bug update, having someone as a QA contact, or workflow enhancements (somebody patches some bug, closes the bug and release engineering looks to forward/backporting it). Kind regards, -- Jeroen van Meeuwen Senior Engineer, Kolab Systems AG e: vanmeeu...@kolabsys.com t: +316 42 801 403 w: http://www.kolabsys.com pgp: 9342 BF08 Cyrus Home Page: http://www.cyrusimap.org/ List Archives/Info: http://lists.andrew.cmu.edu/pipermail/info-cyrus/
