Re: Invalid Header problems

2009-07-29 Thread Joseph Brennan


Google is your friend.  Notice that a Message-ID header exists but has
no string after the label:

Jul 28 09:45:10 boom3 postfix/cleanup[6921]: B9A7225C001: message-id=

See  http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/postfix/2005-02/1410.html


Joseph Brennan
Lead Email Systems Engineer
Columbia University Information Technology


Cyrus Home Page: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyrusimap.web.cmu.edu/twiki
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Invalid Header

2005-04-18 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005, Michael Loftis wrote:
> >Please point me to some RFC or documentation.  I need to present to the
> >higher-UPS a decent explanation on why this message took 6 hours to get
> >delivered.

Now that you have it, make sure they get the idea that they should deep-fry
whomever is responsible for the broken empty-message-id generating
"crapplication".

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Invalid Header

2005-04-18 Thread Michael Loftis

--On Monday, April 18, 2005 15:10 -0500 "Vernon A. Fort" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

My setup is FC3 with postfix + cyrus-2.2.10-3.  I had several messages in
the queue stating "Invalid header".  After searching for hours, I
attempted to save the message using postcat
so I could see what part of the header was invalid.  There was/is a line:
Message-ID:
with nothing after the line.  I removed the line and re-sent the message
successfully.  Why would single line called Message-ID: cause lmtpd
message header errors?
Ahh yeah, RFC822, specifically::
optional-field =
/  "Message-ID"":"   msg-id
/  "Resent-Message-ID" ":"   msg-id
/  "In-Reply-To"   ":"  *(phrase / msg-id)
/  "References"":"  *(phrase / msg-id)
/  "Keywords"  ":"  #phrase
/  "Subject"   ":"  *text
/  "Comments"  ":"  *text
/  "Encrypted" ":" 1#2word
/  extension-field  ; To be defined
/  user-defined-field   ; May be pre-empted
msg-id  =  "<" addr-spec ">"; Unique message id
nothing about it is allowed to be blankthe field is optional, but can't 
be blank.  Plus IMAP clients will use the Message-ID as the 'key' for 
finding a message.  It's funny your posting this because we just had a 
customer have an issue with that...

Please point me to some RFC or documentation.  I need to present to the
higher-UPS a decent explanation on why this message took 6 hours to get
delivered.
Vernon
--
GPG/PGP --> 0xE736BD7E 5144 6A2D 977A 6651 DFBE 1462 E351 88B9 E736 BD7E 
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html


Re: Invalid Header

2005-04-18 Thread Kevin P. Fleming
Vernon A. Fort wrote:
so I could see what part of the header was invalid.  There was/is a line:
   Message-ID:
with nothing after the line.  I removed the line and re-sent the message 
successfully.  Why would single line called Message-ID: cause lmtpd 
message header errors?
Because it's invalid syntax according to the RFCs. A header name must be 
followed by a value, otherwise it cannot be present.
---
Cyrus Home Page: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus
Cyrus Wiki/FAQ: http://cyruswiki.andrew.cmu.edu
List Archives/Info: http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/mailing-list.html