Re: non 8-bit headers.

2011-03-09 Thread Teemu Likonen
* 2011-03-08 13:02 (-0800), David Brown wrote:

> Anyone know how to get GNUS to encode my headers. I just got a message
> rejected to a mailing list because of 8-bit characters in the header.

It's probably the gnus-group-posting-charset-alist variable. Here are
the charset settings that I have found working nicely.


(setq-default
 mm-body-charset-encoding-alist '((iso-8859-1 . 8bit)
  (iso-8859-15 . 8bit)
  (utf-8 . 8bit))
 mm-coding-system-priorities '(iso-8859-1 iso-8859-15 utf-8)
 gnus-default-charset 'iso-8859-1
 gnus-group-posting-charset-alist '((message-this-is-mail nil t)
(message-this-is-news nil t)))

___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: General advice - incorporating gmail IMAP

2011-03-09 Thread Alberto Luaces
Harry Putnam writes:

> Tassilo Horn  writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Do you know any handy urls that show examples of SIEVE scripting?
>>
>> Here's my script.  Maybe it helps a bit.
>
> Thanks for the good input... very helpful seeing a real setup.
>
> Just curious, how you cause the code portion to show up with a green
> background in my `gnus-article-mode'?  I see several people here do
> that.
>
> All I see when viewed raw is:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>
> At begin and end.  

It's message-mark-inserted-region.

-- 
Alberto


___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


M-x gnus-bug RET

2011-03-09 Thread David Kastrup

Is there a particular rationale that the command gnus-bug sends mail to
a mailing list that nobody reads?

That does not seem to make much sense.

-- 
David Kastrup
___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: M-x gnus-bug RET

2011-03-09 Thread Ted Zlatanov
On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:39:46 +0100 David Kastrup  wrote: 

DK> Is there a particular rationale that the command gnus-bug sends mail to
DK> a mailing list that nobody reads?

DK> That does not seem to make much sense.

It should work properly, yeah.  But the mail delivery for b...@gnus.org
should be fixed if it's broken instead of using some other address.

(Although it may be nice to (defalias 'gnus-bug 'emacs-bug) :)

Ted
___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: M-x gnus-bug RET

2011-03-09 Thread David Kastrup
Ted Zlatanov  writes:

> On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 15:39:46 +0100 David Kastrup  wrote: 
>
> DK> Is there a particular rationale that the command gnus-bug sends mail to
> DK> a mailing list that nobody reads?
>
> DK> That does not seem to make much sense.
>
> It should work properly, yeah.  But the mail delivery for
> b...@gnus.org should be fixed if it's broken instead of using some
> other address.

I did not say it is broken.  Just that nobody reads it.

Looking at news://news.gnus.org/gnus.gnus-bug> now, I see that my
mail appeared there, and also that there are several other people
discussing things on that feed, including you.  So it would appear that
somebody reads some things appearing there.  So this particular
complaint of mine apparently is not founded in reality.

> (Although it may be nice to (defalias 'gnus-bug 'emacs-bug) :)

I am not sure in general.  The problem here is that even after
bootstrapping Emacs, message.el barfs upon encountering case constructs
during run-time.  It _does_ have the equivalent of
(eval-when-compile (require 'cl)) at the front of the file.  I am not
versed well enough in the mess that cl is to actually know whether this
is a bug in message.el or a bug in cl.el or a bug elsewhere.

People having loaded cl by default would likely not notice.

-- 
David Kastrup
___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: M-x gnus-bug RET

2011-03-09 Thread jidanni
DK> Looking at news://news.gnus.org/gnus.gnus-bug> now, I see that my
Gee, sounds like a group totally dependent on its server and not
replicated anywhere else.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_point_of_failure .
Maybe they could consider "connecting the intake nozzle of"
https://groups.google.com/group/gnus.gnus-bug/about
to it, as indeed it must be its one true heir.
Anyway, "non NNTP gnus users demand a way to read it too!".

___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english