Re: Gnus header re-scan

2007-11-29 Thread Ross A. Laird

Thanks for the response;

 Is the IMAP server agentized?

Yes.
But still, large mail directories take 5 to 10 minutes at least.

 Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail may
 be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).

Actually I have tried this method, but offlineimap has, on a couple of
occasions, done weird things to my mail directories (such as duplicating
about 4,000 emails on the server).

So, I suppose I'm stuck with waiting. I would use mairix as another
alternative, but I understand there's been issues between mairix and
gnus.

Thanks again.

Ross

-- 
Ross A. Laird, PhD
www.rosslaird.info



___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: Gnus header re-scan

2007-11-29 Thread Tassilo Horn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:

Hi Ross,

 Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail
 may be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).

 Actually I have tried this method, but offlineimap has, on a couple of
 occasions, done weird things to my mail directories (such as
 duplicating about 4,000 emails on the server).

Hm, after I've written this I tried OfflineIMAP and I really like it.
Till now, it didn't do weird things. ;-)

Bye,
Tassilo
-- 
  Emacs is not a development tool but a way of life.
- David Kastrup in alt.religion.emacs -



___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: Gnus header re-scan

2007-11-29 Thread Ross A. Laird
Tassilo Horn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Hm, after I've written this I tried OfflineIMAP and I really like it.
 Till now, it didn't do weird things. ;-)


Well, in general I think it's an excellent program. Perhaps the issue
was with my server, the IMAP version, or various other things. And this
was a few months ago, so perhaps offlineimap itself has improved. But
I'm a bit skittish with it at the moment.

Ross

-- 
Ross A. Laird, PhD
www.rosslaird.info



___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: Gnus header re-scan

2007-11-29 Thread David
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
 I would use mairix as another alternative, but I understand there's
 been issues between mairix and gnus.

There shouldn't anymore if you use the nnmairix backend:

http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs-en/GnusMairix

If you have problems with it, just drop me a mail and I'll try to fix
it. 

-David



___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: Gnus header re-scan

2007-11-29 Thread Ross A. Laird

Thanks for the tip, David.
I'll check it out.

Cheers.

Ross

David [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:
 I would use mairix as another alternative, but I understand there's
 been issues between mairix and gnus.

 There shouldn't anymore if you use the nnmairix backend:

 http://www.emacswiki.org/cgi-bin/emacs-en/GnusMairix

 If you have problems with it, just drop me a mail and I'll try to fix
 it. 

 -David

-- 
Ross A. Laird, PhD
www.rosslaird.info



___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english


Re: Gnus header re-scan

2007-11-27 Thread Tassilo Horn
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ross A. Laird) writes:

Hi Ross,

 Often I need to go into an archive directory to find old email or
 addresses. In mutt, once the headers are downloaded, subsequent
 rescans of the archive are very fast (the archive has about 15,000
 messages in it). But gnus seems to want to re-download all the headers
 again (with C-u space, for example), and this can take as long as 10
 or 20 minutes.  Can I get gnus to work like mutt in this regard, by
 looking at the local copies instead?

Is the IMAP server agentized?  To check that, hit `^' in *Group* to
enter the server buffer.  If there's no (agent) string behind the IMAP
server hit `J a' on this line.  The next time you download articles they
should be cached on the file system.

Another solution that might be even faster for large amounts of mail may
be a local imap proxy (i.e. OfflineIMAP [1]).

Bye,
Tassilo
__
[1] http://software.complete.org/offlineimap



___
info-gnus-english mailing list
info-gnus-english@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english