Re: new subject
Peter Münster writes: > Is incal = Emanuel Berg? Yes, I'm migrating to another computer, because I have to physically "mount" my computer every day, so I thought I'd get a really small and light one (but still stationary), only I discovered the new one lacks a hardware PMC which I need for some experiments, so now I'm "mounting" back and forth between computers - I guess some setting fell short: it shouldn't say "incal" which is my hacker alias (don't tell anyone)... > What is wrong with `message-change-subject'? Nothing, on the contrary, that is the right way, however since it is such an easy thing to do which you don't do that often, I suspect there are people who did their own Elisp to do it, and people who just do it manually, instead of finding out there is a builtin way to do it. > Initially, I just wanted to point you to > `message-change-subject' Yes, we understood :) (message-change-subject NEW-SUBJECT) Ask for NEW-SUBJECT header, append (was: ). -- underground experts united ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject
On Sun, Jan 25 2015, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Clemens Schüller > writes: > >>> What is the old way? >> >> I have this in my .gnus and it works very well :-) > > See Peter? No, not at all, sorry... What is the old way? What is your way? Is incal = Emanuel Berg? What is wrong with `message-change-subject'? Initially, I just wanted to point you to `message-change-subject', but now I'm confused and I don't understand what you're talking about... -- Peter ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject
Clemens Schüller writes: >> What is the old way? > > I have this in my .gnus and it works very well :-) See Peter? My way isn't the only one old! :) -- underground experts united ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject
Peter Münster writes: > Anyway, you seem to do strange things: - When you > reply to a message, Gnus usually strips the "(was: > ...)" part. That did not happen in your reply. Indeed: (setq message-subject-trailing-was-query nil) > - You replied to my message, but it does not appear > in your "References:" header, so that the thread is > broken. Yes, if you can figure out why that happens please tell me. I have my Gnus Elisp here: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/conf/emacs-init/gnus/ > Do you really use Gnus? Oh, no! I'm exposed after all this time... -- underground experts united ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject
Hello! On 25. Jän. 2015 at 20:58 Peter Münster wrote: > On Sun, Jan 25 2015, incal wrote: >>> Yeah, C-c C-f s ! ;) >> >> Indeed, however sometimes you reply to a post the old >> way, > > Hi, > > What is the old way? I have this in my .gnus and it works very well :-) --8<---cut here---start->8--- (defun dpi-change-subject (neues-subject) "introduces new subject." (interactive "snew Subject: ") (let ((case-fold-search nil)) (goto-line 0) (re-search-forward "^Subject: ") (if (re-search-forward "R[Ee]: " nil t) (replace-match "") ) (insert-string neues-subject) (insert-string " (was: ") (end-of-line) (insert-string ")") ) ) (define-key message-mode-map '[(meta n)] 'dpi-change-subject) --8<---cut here---end--->8--- -- Best Regards, Clemens Schüller ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject
On Sun, Jan 25 2015, incal wrote: >> Yeah, C-c C-f s ! ;) > > Indeed, however sometimes you reply to a post the old > way, Hi, What is the old way? > and in mid-edit you realize you are talking about something else. > Or do you have a keystroke for that as well? Yes: C-c C-f s. (Why "as well"?) > Actually, I do - sort of: > http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/conf/emacs-init/gnus/moggle.el What is this? Anyway, you seem to do strange things: - When you reply to a message, Gnus usually strips the "(was: ...)" part. That did not happen in your reply. - You replied to my message, but it does not appear in your "References:" header, so that the thread is broken. Do you really use Gnus? -- Peter ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject (was: alt-tab? really? you're joking...)
incal writes: > Indeed, however sometimes you reply to a post the > old way, and in mid-edit you realize you are talking > about something else. > > Or do you have a keystroke for that as well? No, it is the other way around, it works the way I thought it didn't, but it doesn't work the way I thought it did. Yes, that makes more sense. -- underground experts united ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
Re: new subject (was: alt-tab? really? you're joking...)
Peter Münster writes: >> Or if it gradually evolved out of the old one but >> still has some connection, keep the old subject >> like this Subject: new subject (was: old subject) > > Yeah, C-c C-f s ! ;) Indeed, however sometimes you reply to a post the old way, and in mid-edit you realize you are talking about something else. Or do you have a keystroke for that as well? Actually, I do - sort of: http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/conf/emacs-init/gnus/moggle.el :) -- underground experts united ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
new subject (was: alt-tab? really? you're joking...)
On Sun, Jan 25 2015, incal wrote: > Or if it gradually evolved out of the old one but > still has some connection, keep the old subject like > this > > Subject: new subject (was: old subject) Yeah, C-c C-f s ! ;) -- Peter ___ info-gnus-english mailing list info-gnus-english@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/info-gnus-english
