Invito aggiornato: oVirt 3.6.0 Alpha Release Test Day - mer 2015-05-27 (oVirt schedule)

2015-05-18 Thread sandro.bonazz...@gmail.com
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Google Inc//Google Calendar 70.9054//EN
VERSION:2.0
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:REQUEST
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20150527
DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20150528
DTSTAMP:20150518T125529Z
ORGANIZER;CN=oVirt schedule:mailto:ppqtk46u9cglj7l987ruo2l0f8@group.calenda
 r.google.com
UID:ai2aa31e02qaj02fbi1tusl...@google.com
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;CN=infra@ovirt.org;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:infra@ovirt.org
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;CN=de...@ovirt.org;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:de...@ovirt.org
ATTENDEE;CUTYPE=INDIVIDUAL;ROLE=REQ-PARTICIPANT;PARTSTAT=NEEDS-ACTION;RSVP=
 TRUE;CN=us...@ovirt.org;X-NUM-GUESTS=0:mailto:us...@ovirt.org
CREATED:20150219T141714Z
DESCRIPTION:Visualizza il tuo evento in https://www.google.com/calendar/eve
 nt?action=VIEWeid=YWkyYWEzMWUwMnFhajAyZmJpMXR1c2xtaG8gaW5mcmFAb3ZpcnQub3Jn
 tok=NTIjcHBxdGs0NnU5Y2dsajdsOTg3cnVvMmwwZjhAZ3JvdXAuY2FsZW5kYXIuZ29vZ2xlLm
 NvbTBiY2YyMWU5NjVmZDFkZjUzMTQwODRhNTM0YmVhNGRlYjIyNDViNTcctz=Europe/Romeh
 l=it.
LAST-MODIFIED:20150518T125529Z
LOCATION:
SEQUENCE:3
STATUS:CONFIRMED
SUMMARY:oVirt 3.6.0 Alpha Release Test Day
TRANSP:TRANSPARENT
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR


invite.ics
Description: application/ics
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master

2015-05-18 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 18/05/2015 13:49, Dan Kenigsberg ha scritto:
 On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:32:27AM -0400, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
 - Original Message -
 From: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
 To: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com
 Cc: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, David Caro 
 dcaro...@redhat.com, de...@ovirt.org, infra
 infra@ovirt.org
 Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:50:26 PM
 Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master

 - Original Message -
 From: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com
 To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
 Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com,
 de...@ovirt.org, infra infra@ovirt.org
 Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:41:42 AM
 Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master

 - Original Message -
 From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
 To: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
 Cc: de...@ovirt.org, infra infra@ovirt.org
 Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 3:26:02 PM
 Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master

 Il 15/05/2015 10:23, David Caro ha scritto:

 This job is on yaml, it's fairly simple to add/remove distros, you can
 do
 it
 yourself, ping me when you are around and I can guide you.


 The fix should remove the fc20 section under distro from the file:

 https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=jenkins.git;a=blob;f=jobs/confs/yaml/jobs/vdsm/vdsm_create-rpms.yaml;hb=refs/heads/master

 from the project that has the master version


 Please also disable ovirt-hoste-deploy-offline for fedora 20 as well.
 I'll have to disable all-in-one too.

 Maybe we should consider to drop fedora 20 at all in master at this
 point.
 Opening the vote: +1 for me; adding de...@ovirt.org.

 I'd like to understand the support/build matrix with this change.

 Fedora 22 is to be released 2015-05-26. We currently do not build the
 engine
 for it,
 and I understand we do not intend to, until the port to wildfly/java8 is
 done. Right?
 Any ETA for that?

 We do build everything for fedora 21, but [1] says it will not be
 supported.
 Is this still true?

 We do not build vdsm, at least, for el6, and it's not intended to be
 supported anymore.

 We also build everything for el7.

 So it turns out that the only distro fully supported is el7, and no version
 of
 fedora will be supported until the port to f22/wildfly/java8 is finished.
 Indeed?

 Not sure how long we can/want to be in this state.

 The subject was confusing - I'm talking about vdsm support in Fedora 20, not
 about engine support, which as far as I know, works fine on Fedora 20.

 Sorry for the confusion.

 np at all, but my question still applies (not directed to you specifically) 
 ...
 
 The question applies mostly to Sandro. Personally, I think we can safely
 skip Engine support for f21. Vdsm support for f21 is important (it's
 actually the ONLY supported Fedora version for the master branch, as
 much that master is supported.)

In 3.6 engine and its dependencies will be built on el6, el7 and f22 (as soon 
as it will be able to use wildfly, hopefully next week).
VDSM is already built on el7, f21 and f22, missing support for el6.

Engine will be built on Fedora 20 until F22 support will be in, granting to be 
able to run engine at least on one Fedora release.
We (as integration and releng but probably also infra) have not enough 
resources for handling support for F21 too.


 

 And a related one:

 Do we (want to) support engine on el6/7 with hosts on fedora (21/22)?
 
 As far as I recall, we support this combination for a long long time (as
 long as f* and e* hosts are kept on separate clusters), and I don't see
 the benefit of dropping this support. It can come up useful for
 conservative users, running el6, but wanting to test new stuff on
 el7/f29 hypervisors.
 


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


[URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

2015-05-18 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Hi,
please take urgent action to provide more space on release server.
We'll not be able to release next RC / alpha with just 2 gb of space there.

Thanks,
-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

2015-05-18 Thread David Caro

Depends on what you want to migrate, if only the repos hosting, I'd say 2-3
days dedicated to it to make sure all the processes that depend on them are
also adapted and such, (crons, stats, mirrors, etc).

That would be the easy part imo, and also the one that is requiring most of the
space.

On 05/18, Eyal Edri wrote:
 David,
 
 how much time do we need to migrate it now to phx lab dedicated vm?
 
 e.
 
 - Original Message -
  From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
  To: infra infra@ovirt.org
  Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:37:59 AM
  Subject: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server
  
  Hi,
  please take urgent action to provide more space on release server.
  We'll not be able to release next RC / alpha with just 2 gb of space there.
  
  Thanks,
  --
  Sandro Bonazzola
  Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
  See how it works at redhat.com
  ___
  Infra mailing list
  Infra@ovirt.org
  http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
  
  
  

-- 
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization RD

Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dc...@redhat.com
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605


pgpI8LByinlRH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Logwatch for linode01.ovirt.org (Linux)

2015-05-18 Thread logwatch

 ### Logwatch 7.3.6 (05/19/07)  
Processing Initiated: Mon May 18 03:42:06 2015
Date Range Processed: yesterday
  ( 2015-May-17 )
  Period is day.
  Detail Level of Output: 0
  Type of Output: unformatted
   Logfiles for Host: linode01.ovirt.org
  ## 
 
 - httpd Begin  

 Requests with error response codes
400 Bad Request
   /: 1 Time(s)
   /cgi-bin/test-cgi: 2 Time(s)
   /robots.txt/a.php: 2 Time(s)
   /w00tw00t.at.ISC.SANS.DFind:): 1 Time(s)
404 Not Found
   //app/etc/local.xml: 1 Time(s)
   //components/com_alphauserpoints/assets/ph ... mb/phpThumb.php: 1 Time(s)
   //dompdf.php?input_file=http://identerpris ... css/byroe.jpg??: 12 
Time(s)
   //dompdf.php?input_file=http://identerpris ... r/css/kht.jpg??: 12 
Time(s)
   //dompdf.php?input_file=test??: 12 Time(s)
   //images/stories/barner.gif: 1 Time(s)
   /_h5ai/client/icons/96/folder-page.png: 1 Time(s)
   /_h5ai/client/icons/96/zip.png: 1 Time(s)
   /_h5ai/client/images/app-16x16.ico: 16 Time(s)
   /_h5ai/client/images/crumb.svg: 2 Time(s)
   /_h5ai/client/images/home.svg: 2 Time(s)
   /admin.php: 8 Time(s)
   /admin/: 8 Time(s)
   /admin/board: 1 Time(s)
   /admin/login.php: 9 Time(s)
   /administrator/index.php: 8 Time(s)
   /apple-touch-icon-precomposed.png: 1 Time(s)
   /apple-touch-icon.png: 1 Time(s)
   /bitrix/admin/index.php?lang=en: 8 Time(s)
   /blog/wp-admin/: 19 Time(s)
   /board: 2 Time(s)
   /category/news/feed: 1 Time(s)
   /category/news/feed/: 1 Time(s)
   /data/admin/ver.txt: 1 Time(s)
   /favicon.ico: 343 Time(s)
   /index.php?gf_page=upload: 1 Time(s)
   /index.php?option=com_jcetask=pluginplug ... 86d0dd595c8e20b: 2 Time(s)
   /index.php?q=user: 1 Time(s)
   /listinfo/board: 1 Time(s)
   /meetings/ovirt/2012/ovirt.2012-08-01-14.0 ... F0%E0%E2%EA%E8;: 1 Time(s)
   /old/wp-admin/: 19 Time(s)
   /p: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/arch/2012-February/000264.html/trackback/: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/board/201: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/board/2013-July/000911.html ... F0%E0%E2%EA%E8;: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/devel/2013-April/004273.html/trackback/: 2 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-devel/2013-April/004135.html/trackback/: 2 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-April/014738.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-April/015035.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-August/029579.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-February/007741.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-July/026633.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-July/028883.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-June/021386.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-June/024327.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-November/042017.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-November/subject.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-October/thread.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2012-September/034069.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-April/065282.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-April/066117.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-April/thread.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/092789.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/092904.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/093111.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/093380.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/093612.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/093943.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/095065.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/095323.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/100156.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/101235.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/102649.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/102996.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-August/thread.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/130271.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/130483.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/130747.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/130872.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/132001.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/132627.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/132798.html: 1 Time(s)
   /pipermail/engine-patches/2013-December/134705.html: 1 

Re: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

2015-05-18 Thread Sandro Bonazzola
Il 18/05/2015 09:40, David Caro ha scritto:
 
 Depends on what you want to migrate, if only the repos hosting, I'd say 2-3
 days dedicated to it to make sure all the processes that depend on them are
 also adapted and such, (crons, stats, mirrors, etc).
 
 That would be the easy part imo, and also the one that is requiring most of 
 the
 space.

+1


 
 On 05/18, Eyal Edri wrote:
 David,

 how much time do we need to migrate it now to phx lab dedicated vm?

 e.

 - Original Message -
 From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
 To: infra infra@ovirt.org
 Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:37:59 AM
 Subject: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

 Hi,
 please take urgent action to provide more space on release server.
 We'll not be able to release next RC / alpha with just 2 gb of space there.

 Thanks,
 --
 Sandro Bonazzola
 Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
 See how it works at redhat.com
 ___
 Infra mailing list
 Infra@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra



 


-- 
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


INFRA ISSUE: [oVirt Jenkins] ovirt-engine_3.5_upgrade-from-3.4_merged - Build # 1484 - Still Failing!

2015-05-18 Thread jenkins
Project: http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_3.5_upgrade-from-3.4_merged/ 
Build: 
http://jenkins.ovirt.org/job/ovirt-engine_3.5_upgrade-from-3.4_merged/1484/
Build Number: 1484
Build Status:  Still Failing
Triggered By: Triggered by Gerrit: https://gerrit.ovirt.org/40818

-
Changes Since Last Success:
-
Changes for Build #1472
[Alon Bar-Lev] packaging: setup: pki: renew about to expire certificates

[Sandro Bonazzola] fix centos 7 base repo


Changes for Build #1473
[Tal Nisan] core: Check attached VMs snapshot preview only status when moving a 
disk


Changes for Build #1474
[Alexander Wels] userportal,webadmin: multiple login messages


Changes for Build #1475
[Eli Mesika] core: change other OS to 64bit

[David Caro] Fixed only one rpmbuild option being used

[Sandro Bonazzola] add hooks to vdsm_install-rpm-sanity

[Sandro Bonazzola] uses yum-deprecated where available

[Sandro Bonazzola] add python-six dep to vdsm build jobs

[David Caro] Added fix for BZ1118988


Changes for Build #1476
[Amit Aviram] core: Extracting virtIO-scsi disabling check in CDA

[David Caro] Added vdsm 3.5 non-merged jobs

[Eyal Edri] yaml: remove obselete use of m2crypto due to BZ#601 fixed

[Eyal Edri] yaml: add default values for throttle concurrent builds


Changes for Build #1477
[Amit Aviram] core: NPE fix in clone image from snapshot


Changes for Build #1478
[Maor Lipchuk] restapi: Use description for discover FCP Storage in rsdl

[Eyal Edri] The workers option is not supported on test

[Eyal Edri] yaml: enable throttle builds for rpm install template


Changes for Build #1479
[Dudi Maroshi] engine: Fix ambigous error message


Changes for Build #1480
[Dudi Maroshi] engine: validate (vm NUMA nodes) = (vm CPU cores)


Changes for Build #1481
[Tomer Saban] webadmin: Fixed capitalization on New Cluster.


Changes for Build #1482
[Tomer Saban] webadmin: Fixed text wrapping in New Cluster.


Changes for Build #1483
[Amit Aviram] restapi: Extending disk editing when adding a new template.

[David Caro] refactor host-deploy hack

[David Caro] On EL6 master don't build ovirt-host-deploy-offline

[Sandro Bonazzola] ovirt-engine-wildfly-overlay: new job

[David Caro] Allowing empty .req files on standard build

[David Caro] jobs: add ovirt-engine-sdk jobs


Changes for Build #1484
[Yedidyah Bar David] packaging: Do not dump/restore owner/privileges




-
Failed Tests:
-
No tests ran. 

___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

2015-05-18 Thread Eyal Edri


- Original Message -
 From: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com
 To: Eyal Edri ee...@redhat.com
 Cc: infra infra@ovirt.org
 Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 10:40:05 AM
 Subject: Re: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server
 
 
 Depends on what you want to migrate, if only the repos hosting, I'd say 2-3
 days dedicated to it to make sure all the processes that depend on them are
 also adapted and such, (crons, stats, mirrors, etc).

what about puppetizing the server, so the new vm on phx will be fully
configured and reproducable via puppet?

 
 That would be the easy part imo, and also the one that is requiring most of
 the
 space.
 
 On 05/18, Eyal Edri wrote:
  David,
  
  how much time do we need to migrate it now to phx lab dedicated vm?
  
  e.
  
  - Original Message -
   From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
   To: infra infra@ovirt.org
   Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:37:59 AM
   Subject: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server
   
   Hi,
   please take urgent action to provide more space on release server.
   We'll not be able to release next RC / alpha with just 2 gb of space
   there.
   
   Thanks,
   --
   Sandro Bonazzola
   Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community collaboration.
   See how it works at redhat.com
   ___
   Infra mailing list
   Infra@ovirt.org
   http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
   
   
   
 
 --
 David Caro
 
 Red Hat S.L.
 Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization RD
 
 Tel.: +420 532 294 605
 Email: dc...@redhat.com
 Web: www.redhat.com
 RHT Global #: 82-62605
 
 ___
 Infra mailing list
 Infra@ovirt.org
 http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
 
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

2015-05-18 Thread David Caro
On 05/18, Eyal Edri wrote:
 
 
 - Original Message -
  From: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com
  To: Eyal Edri ee...@redhat.com
  Cc: infra infra@ovirt.org
  Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 10:40:05 AM
  Subject: Re: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server
  
  
  Depends on what you want to migrate, if only the repos hosting, I'd say 2-3
  days dedicated to it to make sure all the processes that depend on them are
  also adapted and such, (crons, stats, mirrors, etc).
 
 what about puppetizing the server, so the new vm on phx will be fully
 configured and reproducable via puppet?

I was including the puppetizing, though the puppetizing of the related
processes is another issue (that spans throug multiple machines, that might not
be puppetized)

 
  
  That would be the easy part imo, and also the one that is requiring most of
  the
  space.
  
  On 05/18, Eyal Edri wrote:
   David,
   
   how much time do we need to migrate it now to phx lab dedicated vm?
   
   e.
   
   - Original Message -
From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
To: infra infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 9:37:59 AM
Subject: [URGENT][ACTION REQUIRED] going out of space on release server

Hi,
please take urgent action to provide more space on release server.
We'll not be able to release next RC / alpha with just 2 gb of space
there.

Thanks,
--
Sandro Bonazzola
Better technology. Faster innovation. Powered by community 
collaboration.
See how it works at redhat.com
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra



  
  --
  David Caro
  
  Red Hat S.L.
  Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization RD
  
  Tel.: +420 532 294 605
  Email: dc...@redhat.com
  Web: www.redhat.com
  RHT Global #: 82-62605
  
  ___
  Infra mailing list
  Infra@ovirt.org
  http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra
  

-- 
David Caro

Red Hat S.L.
Continuous Integration Engineer - EMEA ENG Virtualization RD

Tel.: +420 532 294 605
Email: dc...@redhat.com
Web: www.redhat.com
RHT Global #: 82-62605


pgpNYo80C0k7X.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra


Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master

2015-05-18 Thread Dan Kenigsberg
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 01:32:27AM -0400, Yedidyah Bar David wrote:
 - Original Message -
  From: Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com
  To: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com
  Cc: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com, David Caro 
  dcaro...@redhat.com, de...@ovirt.org, infra
  infra@ovirt.org
  Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:50:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master
  
  - Original Message -
   From: Yedidyah Bar David d...@redhat.com
   To: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
   Cc: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, Nir Soffer nsof...@redhat.com,
   de...@ovirt.org, infra infra@ovirt.org
   Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2015 8:41:42 AM
   Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master
   
   - Original Message -
From: Sandro Bonazzola sbona...@redhat.com
To: David Caro dcaro...@redhat.com, Nir Soffer 
nsof...@redhat.com
Cc: de...@ovirt.org, infra infra@ovirt.org
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2015 3:26:02 PM
Subject: Re: [ovirt-devel] Fedora 20 is not supported any more on master

Il 15/05/2015 10:23, David Caro ha scritto:
 
 This job is on yaml, it's fairly simple to add/remove distros, you can
 do
 it
 yourself, ping me when you are around and I can guide you.
 
 
 The fix should remove the fc20 section under distro from the file:
 
 https://gerrit.ovirt.org/gitweb?p=jenkins.git;a=blob;f=jobs/confs/yaml/jobs/vdsm/vdsm_create-rpms.yaml;hb=refs/heads/master
 
 from the project that has the master version


Please also disable ovirt-hoste-deploy-offline for fedora 20 as well.
I'll have to disable all-in-one too.

Maybe we should consider to drop fedora 20 at all in master at this
point.
Opening the vote: +1 for me; adding de...@ovirt.org.
   
   I'd like to understand the support/build matrix with this change.
   
   Fedora 22 is to be released 2015-05-26. We currently do not build the
   engine
   for it,
   and I understand we do not intend to, until the port to wildfly/java8 is
   done. Right?
   Any ETA for that?
   
   We do build everything for fedora 21, but [1] says it will not be
   supported.
   Is this still true?
   
   We do not build vdsm, at least, for el6, and it's not intended to be
   supported anymore.
   
   We also build everything for el7.
   
   So it turns out that the only distro fully supported is el7, and no 
   version
   of
   fedora will be supported until the port to f22/wildfly/java8 is finished.
   Indeed?
   
   Not sure how long we can/want to be in this state.
  
  The subject was confusing - I'm talking about vdsm support in Fedora 20, not
  about engine support, which as far as I know, works fine on Fedora 20.
  
  Sorry for the confusion.
 
 np at all, but my question still applies (not directed to you specifically) 
 ...

The question applies mostly to Sandro. Personally, I think we can safely
skip Engine support for f21. Vdsm support for f21 is important (it's
actually the ONLY supported Fedora version for the master branch, as
much that master is supported.)


 And a related one:
 
 Do we (want to) support engine on el6/7 with hosts on fedora (21/22)?

As far as I recall, we support this combination for a long long time (as
long as f* and e* hosts are kept on separate clusters), and I don't see
the benefit of dropping this support. It can come up useful for
conservative users, running el6, but wanting to test new stuff on
el7/f29 hypervisors.

___
Infra mailing list
Infra@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/infra