Re: Why Bodhi have not closed ticket when package was pushed to stable?
Dne 21.5.2013 21:36, Luke Macken napsal(a): On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:46:26PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: This [1] advisory was pushed into stable. Why Bodhi did not closed the associated ticket in BZ [2]? Thanks for pointing this out, Vít. I wrote some scripts[0] that were supposed to clean up these stray bugs from the time we upgraded our python-bugzilla package, but I only set the script to look from 2013-05-06 onwards. I'll modify the script and re-run it and try to catch the remainder of these bugs. Thanks, luke [0]: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/bodhi.git/commit/?h=develop&id=2d5acd1715275451d7ea414f1fc182bb92f2c961 ___ Thanks. My ticket is closed now. Vít ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Freeze break request: mediawiki security upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, I would like to request +1's to upgrade mediawiki on our app servers to 1.19.7. This is a security upgrade only, and does NOT need any database schema modifications. There should be no downtime, as the upgrade is just "yum update mediawiki119 && service httpd restart". Regards, Patrick Uiterwijk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRnRZEAAoJEIZXmA2atR5QyxsP/3WKA90S4NJuRufFhGB8zELR dLK3yJ5/xvpDAydxRHs8AyrBPy+0Br9PUBFJRQVf6iDtTwzZx6rJ9+o6yLyMRsj/ pDsboEoVDygVYjx8KJzkFp4lKWEkQD9IZgPUtd1SoLNt766gMBvLWw7Jpff2TleJ pCLTxArqXqcH5AvP7xd6rHIVVcGrkMmKLAdU/8Xzf6xwBMFv1HYuBKv1s3KcF+T2 tKx2w3X5ycAC1u6cCc3LsRsQOfll6arMGtVZ9P6KSikEA0x9Kptq9KKJ16fi8/Hx Ic2UBEI4lkCNq8XHHmpGDZPQ5OBPB5VSokx2Dz3V6D/JijY13z+vNQx0M+X4o4yo 0a0U2BNXnesAvnX8VOPHuZiBqgcPvug0RkY5ZjIJvr4XdoAKFimjY/P3+MfjxB9C HxCIzOfCJm5tE39kn8pYMa/pzLUP6+us8nbbZ+wDS8/+UhwwcZHnEFqOhG+l95PN 875/3IAKszEVBGrC/R4hTABqySUAfeQd75cFhgVekEqfAYPDZALtkZMt4a0NWHVS 8xgQ50fcvu2MHKRQQCmLm6YMnV4UYEoLg95WcoPe0W22nsY+/G1Ag3rDWALQ4EIe QnOiewDAhjdIFZzOm2YHklMgHGqizmnx6HJXdnGJV4sZVB+ZNlcxIntJheCgAZ+L 4EXGIFu5u6olIpZ0gWYS =BwMI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Freeze break request: mediawiki security upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:02:28 +0200 Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > Hello, > > I would like to request +1's to upgrade mediawiki on our app servers > to 1.19.7. This is a security upgrade only, and does NOT need any > database schema modifications. There should be no downtime, as the > upgrade is just "yum update mediawiki119 && service httpd restart". > Has it been tested in staging? I ask b/c rolling back the wiki package can be fraught with suffering, so I'd like to know that we know this works before we do it. thanks - -sv -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFRnRkG1Aj3x2mIbMcRAsOOAKCJUaBQ4e3QAsqmbWrLcSFRBpv+EQCeIO45 epxYX/ht+yJ6jLXMMKa+Flg= =KT1g -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Freeze break request: mediawiki security upgrade
On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:14 -0400 seth vidal wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:02:28 +0200 > Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > Hello, > > > > I would like to request +1's to upgrade mediawiki on our app servers > > to 1.19.7. This is a security upgrade only, and does NOT need any > > database schema modifications. There should be no downtime, as the > > upgrade is just "yum update mediawiki119 && service httpd restart". > > > > > Has it been tested in staging? I ask b/c rolling back the wiki package > can be fraught with suffering, so I'd like to know that we know this > works before we do it. Yeah, definitely do in stg first... provided everything goes well there, +1 for prod kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Freeze break request: mediawiki security upgrade
On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:38:29 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:14 -0400 > seth vidal wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:02:28 +0200 > > Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to request +1's to upgrade mediawiki on our app > > > servers to 1.19.7. This is a security upgrade only, and does NOT > > > need any database schema modifications. There should be no > > > downtime, as the upgrade is just "yum update mediawiki119 && > > > service httpd restart". > > > > > > > > > Has it been tested in staging? I ask b/c rolling back the wiki > > package can be fraught with suffering, so I'd like to know that we > > know this works before we do it. > > Yeah, definitely do in stg first... > > provided everything goes well there, +1 for prod > > kevin After having seen the test +1 -sv signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Freeze break request: mediawiki security upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 04:08:59PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Wed, 22 May 2013 13:38:29 -0600 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 May 2013 15:14:14 -0400 > > seth vidal wrote: > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Wed, 22 May 2013 21:02:28 +0200 > > > Patrick Uiterwijk wrote: > > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > > Hash: SHA512 > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > I would like to request +1's to upgrade mediawiki on our app > > > > servers to 1.19.7. This is a security upgrade only, and does NOT > > > > need any database schema modifications. There should be no > > > > downtime, as the upgrade is just "yum update mediawiki119 && > > > > service httpd restart". > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has it been tested in staging? I ask b/c rolling back the wiki > > > package can be fraught with suffering, so I'd like to know that we > > > know this works before we do it. > > > > Yeah, definitely do in stg first... > > > > provided everything goes well there, +1 for prod > > > > kevin > > > > After having seen the test > +1 > > -sv Upgrade on production completed. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJRnSbDAAoJEIZXmA2atR5QDKYP/1k5wQpGNK7pB1p1P11W4O/j UcevQ1cv0S+nomTOyyK5ZWfAZ6ApyzzJp5r4Yij7JSuZgcwGq02yHNOOdcnBNEG5 Wg+41S1OLgI/IjRFdZDIWmzGRcpT/d327ZyP3yeF6YrdRsiLIHNtTCZzp6aMFeLV wIhJO5TSrp94klWj6uW4VgVXLh2XlIYv4JBWvr8dLcT0Qr+R73XWhb2Y1eh0zPLF CjnBX0mM1CG6Q7s5oJnvgtX2IIx1UiWExfyHWbFZ3OPWv4vYzwQM4MmyYW0YnRGj hBDpEHWDD3Lq2Xr3TaqfCFRg9QhD0v4xpKpw9beGjwglwn58ypmpJDmONnq/Xu/y 3QO1iwGzx+gmBasNgHu4RNmR5uVGwj8MdP3IcEYfeu05uM/c5eYlnH2V+jL7nSa0 E2mHcVQuVoof6TCyeqFRosN/7nrHPiayorOoNLQJozaKje/h4tn+J1jXm3OpbfBS 8lzOfMEY2rnpLSylkyw1ccIIIUg7fzQQyCopNMrx+tVi1WZH0lIG1rY+qcGWlUiF h/3Tg68nE15IthPBX6wSK/uJ6GL3TJnjtBdZCc6fnf/44Ct2BynUd4q5oO7fM3ZI 9mIwRbL7cg9ZRcPAkjUrczLI8NdYMRehL9bpZV+f/LIC2mBq7O3c/RmcsZb6gzL9 htIlZKGSWqbQR3EX2Gi3 =Pdtf -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Plan for tomorrow's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-05-23)
The infrastructure team will be having it's weekly meeting tomorrow, 2013-05-23 at 19:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting on the freenode network. Suggested topics: #topic New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks. If any new folks want to give a quick one line bio or any apprentices would like to ask general questions, they can do so in this part of the meeting. Don't be shy! #topic Applications status / discussion Check in on status of our applications: pkgdb, fas, bodhi, koji, community, voting, tagger, packager, dpsearch, etc. If there's new releases, bugs we need to work around or things to note. #topic Sysadmin status / discussion Here we talk about sysadmin related happenings from the previous week, or things that are upcoming. #topic Private Cloud status update / discussion #topic Upcoming Tasks/Items #info 2013-05-14 to 2013-05-28 BETA infrastructure freeze #info 2013-05-28 F19 beta release #info 2013-05-31 end of 1st quarter #info 2013-06-01 nag fi-apprentices #info 2013-06-08 drop inactive apprentices #info 2013-06-18 to 2013-07-02 FINAL infrastructure freeze. #info 2013-07-01 nag fi-apprentices #info 2013-07-02 F19 FINAL release #topic Open Floor Submit your agenda items, as tickets in the trac instance and send a note replying to this thread. More info here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Meetings#Meetings Thanks kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
freeze break request: mail alias fix
Quick fix for a incorrect alias: diff --git a/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb b/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb index 2440f54..156fc33 100644 --- a/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb +++ b/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb @@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ fudcon-cfp: /dev/null fudcon-paper:fudcon-cfp # flock -flockpress: suehle,spot,rbergero -flockinfo: suehle,spot,rbergero +flockpress: rsuehle,spot,rbergero +flockinfo: rsuehle,spot,rbergero # News #news: nman64,pfrields,sundaram,tchung,kwade +1s? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: freeze break request: mail alias fix
+1 On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Quick fix for a incorrect alias: > > diff --git a/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb > b/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb index 2440f54..156fc33 100644 > --- a/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb > +++ b/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb > @@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ fudcon-cfp: /dev/null > fudcon-paper:fudcon-cfp > > # flock > -flockpress: suehle,spot,rbergero > -flockinfo: suehle,spot,rbergero > +flockpress: rsuehle,spot,rbergero > +flockinfo: rsuehle,spot,rbergero > > # News > #news: nman64,pfrields,sundaram,tchung,kwade > > +1s? > > kevin > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list > infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: freeze break request: mail alias fix
On 05/22/2013 06:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: [snip] -flockpress: suehle,spot,rbergero -flockinfo: suehle,spot,rbergero +flockpress: rsuehle,spot,rbergero +flockinfo: rsuehle,spot,rbergero [snip] +1s? +1 Yes, please -- Brendan Conoboy / Red Hat, Inc. / b...@redhat.com ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: freeze break request: mail alias fix
On 05/22/2013 09:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Quick fix for a incorrect alias: > > diff --git a/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb > b/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb index 2440f54..156fc33 100644 > --- a/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb > +++ b/configs/system/smtp/aliases.template.erb > @@ -144,8 +144,8 @@ fudcon-cfp: /dev/null > fudcon-paper:fudcon-cfp > > # flock > -flockpress: suehle,spot,rbergero > -flockinfo: suehle,spot,rbergero > +flockpress: rsuehle,spot,rbergero > +flockinfo: rsuehle,spot,rbergero > > # News > #news: nman64,pfrields,sundaram,tchung,kwade > > +1s? LGTM. +1. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
