Re: July status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On 07/04/2014 09:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0. Whats your fedora account system login? msuchy 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? No. I'm mostly relying on presence in systadmin-cloud membership. 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? Cloud. 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14 No. 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? I'm considering to leave and focus on sysadmin-cloud. 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? no. 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? To find free time :) 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? Yes to both. 8. What is your favorite movie of all time? "At ziji duchove" and if fact most of movies from this director: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0513792/ -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Transifex has become proprietary
I support moving away from TX if it prevents us from obeying our 4Fs. But as a long term translator and a team coordinator, please allow me to say something that I'm concerning about: 1. If we decide to move, what platform should we move to? Which is a better place to move? I haven't use Zanata before, so I can't compare it to transifex. I tried to login with my FAS account today, but didn't succeed, and it redirected me to signup page. On the other hand, there are coordinators in zanata already, if we move to zanata, who will be the team coordinator? The one from transifex, or the one from zanata, or both of them, or who else? 2. Will all the contributors(L10n side) willing to move, if not, we will lose some of our contributors, if yes, all the L10n contributors should sign up to another platform again, and each coordinator should approve of their join request manually. We should find some simple way to minimize the trouble. 3. Will all the translation history and record be kept? I remember the last moving, when many translators' credits and history/record were lost, at least I can't find them anymore. Of course some of the projects may keep the record on their project sites. But this should be a big issue to resolve first if we decide to move away. If any measures can be carried out to solve the problem, transifex is still a good platform for Fedora. Anyway, translators are familiar with its UI and function now. -- Regards, Tiansworld Fedora Project Contributor ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: July status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On 07/04/2014 02:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Greetings. 0. Whats your fedora account system login? dmossor 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? No. Yes. 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? No. See above. 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14 No. 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? Yes. 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? No. 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? Tickets. 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? Yes. I wish to note, however, that I will not be able to attend any meetings until August 14 due to university class at that time. 8. What is your favorite movie of all time? The Last Starfighter. Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! kevin You're Welcome Dan -- Dan Mossor, RHCSA Systems Engineer at Large Fedora QA Team | Fedora KDE SIG | Fedora Server SIG Fedora Infrastructure Apprentice FAS: dmossor IRC: danofsatx San Antonio, Texas, USA ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: July status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
Sent from my iPhone > On Jul 4, 2014, at 12:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Greetings. > > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? lanica > > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? Yes > > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? Somewhat. If I had to pick one it would be "web", however I'm used to having access to all systems and working on the highest priorities (in my work environment.) > > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14 I have looked at them but definitely will need to ask quite a few questions. I'm in and out work wise for about a week. > > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? > Absolutely. > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? I'll jump in the channels or email the lists when I have some time. > > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? > Gathering all of the information about the environments. It seems that most sources of information are not oriented towards new individuals -- in other words you have to know what you're looking for. There's almost always someone available in at least one of the channels so that's not a problem at all. > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? > Yes. I think they are very helpful and interesting to hear what other projects are being worked on. > 8. What is your favorite movie of all time? Back to the Future...perhaps > > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Transifex has become proprietary
On 07/03/2014 04:20 PM, Dimitris Glezos wrote: It's a good thing that this came up, it'd be nice to have a clear decision from the Fedora part. I explained in detail the log & reasoning behind the decision to stop maintaining the open-source branch in the GitHub issue Rahul provided. Dimitris, I understood that it costed you a lot of time to provide sources, which works for everybody and which were rarely used. So you stopped releasing it. But can you release the code, which works just for you? The code for your main instance? And if somebody want to run his own instance, let him maintain the differences. This will have the benefit, that people will be able to browse the code and contribute with fixes/RFE (yet without testing), but you can finalize it yourself as you did with my XLIFF contribution. And you will be open-source company (which I believe you are in heart). And Fedora will be able to continue Transifex. Otherwise - I'm afraid - the force to use open-source solution will be too strong and migration to other system will be inevitable. And that would be shame, because I still think that Transifex has superior features. Please reconsider this in your team. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Following up on Atomic in Fedora infrastructure
For https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Atomic_Cloud_Image I was talking with Dennis Gilmore about some of what we would need to do in order to have Atomic be more closely integrated into the mainline infrastructure. From memory, some action items: * Define repodata.xml or similar to enable mirroring, add mirrorlist support [walters] * Start doing tree composes in daily compose runs [dgilmore] * Move fedora-atomic git repository into fedorahosted [walters] * Determine how Anaconda-in-Koji can pull tree content [?] Also, I need to followup to Kevin on the mirroring, which is related to the last item. Dennis, can you post the picture you took of the whiteboard? ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Following up on Atomic in Fedora infrastructure
On Mon, 07 Jul 2014 10:35:38 -0700 Colin Walters wrote: > For https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Atomic_Cloud_Image I was > talking with Dennis Gilmore about some of what we would need to do in > order to have Atomic be more closely integrated into the mainline > infrastructure. > > From memory, some action items: > > * Define repodata.xml or similar to enable mirroring, add mirrorlist > support [walters] > * Start doing tree composes in daily compose runs [dgilmore] Was this going to be in koji? Then we may need a koji plugin, or to get a generic 'run in chroot' koji plugin working. > * Move fedora-atomic git repository into fedorahosted [walters] > * Determine how Anaconda-in-Koji can pull tree content [?] > > Also, I need to followup to Kevin on the mirroring, which is related > to the last item. We could mirror at alt for now, I can set that up... if we are doing the composes in koji, we could also just ask folks to use kojipkgs, and only mirror 'release' trees? > Dennis, can you post the picture you took of the whiteboard? That would be good. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
