Re: ansible 2.0 on batcave01

2016-02-12 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Dne 30.1.2016 v 18:40 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> The only other thing related to ansible 2.0 I can think of is that copr
> may need to adjust to the new API if it's using that directly, but it
> can do that on it's own timeframe. 

Nope. We are calling ansible python methods directly just on copr-be. And that 
is different machine, different instance
of ansible.

-- 
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: February status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices

2016-02-12 Thread Daniel Bruno
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group
> in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the
> infrastructure list).
>
> Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list
> for everyone to see and comment on.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice
>
> At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an
> email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for
> you.
>
> I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the
> following data or anything related you can think of that might help us
> make the apprentice program more useful.
>
> 0. Whats your fedora account system login?
>

dbruno


>
> 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at
> our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to?
>
Yes, on lockbox01.


>
> 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute
> to more?
>
Yes.

>
> 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice
> 'easyfix' tickets?
> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/report/14
>
> Normally I'm looking at https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix, because there
is more open tickets there.
There is some problem on that?


> 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever
> reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road?
>
Yes.


>
> 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help
> you do any of the above?
>
Not.


>
> 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved?
> Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you?
> Finding tickets in your interest area?
>

> 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them
> helpful or interesting?
>
I've been missing some meetings, but normally are very helpful.

>
> 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our
> meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby
>
Yes.


>
> 9. What will you spend leap day on this year? (2016-02-29)
>
Probably working.


>
> Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including
> improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc.
>
> Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the
> group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or
> whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the
> group up to date with active folks).
>
> Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback!
>
> kevin
>



-- 
Daniel Bruno (dbruno)
http://dbruno.org
Fedora Ambassadors Mentor @ LATAM
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org


Re: ansible 2.0 on batcave01

2016-02-12 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:36:11 +0100
Miroslav Suchý  wrote:
> 
> Nope. We are calling ansible python methods directly just on copr-be.
> And that is different machine, different instance of ansible.

Right, so it can migrate in it's own timeframe. ;) 

But it should migrate sometime... 1.9.x isn't going to be supported all
that much longer, so it should move to the new 2.0 api as soon as it
can. 

Would you like me to file a bug somewhere to track that, or it's
already on the roadmap?

kevin


pgp15LfrVMGDs.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org