Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
Hi, I'm new to fedora infrastructure group and just try to get familiar with many things. > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? yisupeng > > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? no, and yes > > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? not yet > > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix just checked the list > > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? Yes > > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? No. > > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? Haven't found any for now. > > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? Nope. > > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby Yes. > > 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? Not familar with fall beverage ;) > > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the infrastructure list). Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list for everyone to see and comment on. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for you. I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the following data or anything related you can think of that might help us make the apprentice program more useful. 0. Whats your fedora account system login? cyberhack 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? Just recently added. 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? Not use yet 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix yes 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? yes 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above?You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the infrastructure list). Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list for everyone to see and comment on. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for you. I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the following data or anything related you can think of that might help us make the apprentice program more useful. 0. Whats your fedora account system login? 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the group up to date with active folks). Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! kevin 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the group up to date with active folks). Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! kevin On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:07:53 -0500 > Edward G wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am new to fedora infrastructure, and I do not have the access to > > fi-apprentice > > group yet. Can you add me to the group? > > > > Thank you! > > > > Account:cyberhack > > Done, sorry for the delay today, got sidetracked. :) > > kevin > > > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave@lists. > fedoraproject.org > > ___ infrastructure
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:07:53 -0500 Edward G wrote: > Hi, > > I am new to fedora infrastructure, and I do not have the access to > fi-apprentice > group yet. Can you add me to the group? > > Thank you! > > Account:cyberhack Done, sorry for the delay today, got sidetracked. :) kevin pgpE661W2cF6G.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migrating license agreement from FAS2 to FAS3
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from FAS2 > to > FAS3. > > We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: > - cla_dell > - cla_done > - cla_ibm > - cla_fedora > - cla_redhat > - cla_click > - cla_intel > - cla_fpca > > For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement: > `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 > as > having signed that new license agreement. > > The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by creating > their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only > interested in the FPCA group these days? > > Thoughts? I think some of the alternate groups have value still to some Fedora participants. We may want to consult Spot, who knows more about the history of those groups. -- Paul W. Frieldshttp://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 13:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? pcreech17 > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? No, yes. > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix I've been browsing them as of late > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? Yes > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? No > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? Time > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? Yes, and yes. > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby Not recently > 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? Pumpkin Pie Porter http://deepriverbrewing.com/beer-lineup > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. Not at this time > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] update owner-sync-pkgdb to support the docker namespace
+1 here signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:06:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? > tiagovieira > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? > no > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? > no > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix > I had no time. > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? > Yes, definitely. > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? > no > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? > n/a > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? > Last month I checked my IRC logs only, couldn't make it because of time zone change. > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby > Yes > 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? > Coffee, always. > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > no -- Tiago M. Vieira, RHCE fingerprint = 2525 D9C5 A152 54C0 575F 102E 2CB8 A45A E245 073D signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
0. Whats your fedora account system login? deyoe88 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? No, and I plan too. 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? N/A 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://pagure.io/fedora-infra structure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix Not yet, I was planning on attending a meeting. But am unable to do so due to my work hours. 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? Yes, and stay with it for the long term. 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? No 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? Finding ticket that i'm interested Nothing is to hard, just need to get into the swing of things as I am new. 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? No, I currently work during the meetings. 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby Yes 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? Lots of warm coffee :) On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Marc Bagatela wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? > marc84 > > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? > Yes > > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? > Yes > > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix > Yes, I have looked easyfix tickets > > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? > Yes > > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? > No > > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? > Finding ticket that i'm interested > > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? > Yes > > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby > Yes > > 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? > Heineken > > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 8:49 PM, charles profitt > wrote: > >> On Wed, 2016-11-02 at 13:06 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > >> > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? >> >> cprofitt >> >> > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look >> > at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? >> >> I have not. I hope too, but time is an issue. >> >> > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or >> > contribute to more? >> >> NA >> >> > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi- >> > apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? >> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyf >> > ix >> >> I have looked at, but not undertaken one yet. >> >> > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for >> > whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the >> > road? >> >> I would like to still be involved. >> >> > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would >> > help you do any of the above? >> >> No, this is fantastic. I just have to find the time. >> >> > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involve
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On 03-Nov-2016 12:36 AM, "Kevin Fenzi" wrote: > > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > Hi, Responses inline. > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? > skamath > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? > Yes. > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? > I'm starting to work with statscache. > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > Not yet. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix > > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? > Ofcourse, yes. > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? > Nothing at the moment. > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? > Finding tickets. > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? > Yes. > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby > Yes. > 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? > Err, anything goes. > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin > > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] update owner-sync-pkgdb to support the docker namespace
On jueves, 3 de noviembre de 2016 9:23:12 AM CDT Kevin Fenzi wrote: > +1 here. > > Is there an upstream for this? Or it only exists in our ansible? > > kevin it only exists in our ansible Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migrating license agreement from FAS2 to FAS3
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:12:18AM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote: > On 11/03/2016 07:18 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > > > This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from > > FAS2 to > > FAS3. > > > > We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: > > - cla_dell > > - cla_done > > - cla_ibm > > - cla_fedora > > - cla_redhat > > - cla_click > > - cla_intel > > - cla_fpca > > > > For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement: > > `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in > > FAS2 as > > having signed that new license agreement. > > > > The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by > > creating > > their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only > > interested in the FPCA group these days? > > > > Thoughts? > > > > From a usability standpoint, even though these groups are deprecated, I > still see a notable number of new people apply to these groups (even if > they're not employees of said companies). It can also be a little confusing > with the FPCA in place too. If it's easy to do so, it's my opinion that it > would make more sense to keep it all to one group. :) My preference is also to just keep cla_fpca and call it a day, but then we loose some data/history. So the question is: do we care about that data/history? Since those CLAs are no longer used, we could no care, I just want to make sure it's the case :) Thanks, Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] update owner-sync-pkgdb to support the docker namespace
+1 here. Is there an upstream for this? Or it only exists in our ansible? kevin pgpToMSW5xnpb.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migrating license agreement from FAS2 to FAS3
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 12:18:33 +0100 Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > Good Morning Everyone, > > This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements > from FAS2 to FAS3. > > We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: > - cla_dell > - cla_done > - cla_ibm > - cla_fedora > - cla_redhat > - cla_click > - cla_intel > - cla_fpca I think some of these are no longer used, but we should confirm with spot. The process in fas2 was any of the cla_whatever would auto add you to cla_done and thats the one we look at to see if it's done. > > For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license > agreement: `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the > `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 as having signed that new license agreement. So, FPCA isn't really a CLA... and see: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/4806 We were hoping to nuke all refrences to CLA in fas3... and just have FPCA. From that ticket it sounds like the ibm one is the only one still active? so perhaps have a fpca_ibm and fpca and the ibm one grants fpca? > > The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by > creating their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or > are we only interested in the FPCA group these days? > > Thoughts? Only active ones for sure...see that ticket and we can figure out which ones can die? kevin pgpUpJoqaIsak.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Triage of fedmsg issues
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 16:24:40 +0100 Aurelien Bompard wrote: > Hey folks, > > I'd like to do some triage of the fedmsg issues currently open on > Github, then discuss with you what we should prioritize and decide on > a roadmap. Triage, first. I haven't had a chance to get to know > fedmsg inimately enough so I hope you'll correct me. Here is the list > of open issues in reverse chronological order, and the label that I > plan to assign to them. Some may be obsolete, I'd love to have your > opinion on those. One thought: do we want to look at migrating to pagure and doing the triage there? Or doing triage now and moving later? > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/373 > Extract underylying technology stack into a clearly Fedora independent > library? > -> enhancement, docs > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/372 > fedmsg-logger --json-input can't handle multiline json > -> bug, easyfix > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/371 > fedmsg-hub pulls a huge amount of backlog from datagrepper when simply > restarted > -> enhancement, performance > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/370 > irc bot no messages > -> docs > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/365 > Add file-based locking to CRL modification > -> bug > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/339 > OS name, release and architecture to meta? > -> enhancement, easyfix > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/320 > BadObject when deleting a branch from git repository > -> obsolete? This is likely also https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/4022 Perhaps I should close that one UPSTREAM? (I have no idea if it still needs fixing) > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/312 > encoding discrepancies between php and python > -> bug > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/304 > python sample does not work like suggested in docs > -> docs > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/302 > fedmsg-relay --daemon ENVAL and flooding logs > -> bug > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/260 > seperate colors for the secondary arch builds on irc? > -> enhancement > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/172 > Add fedmsg hooks for transifex platform > -> enhancement, blocked > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/159 > Add fedmsg-meta-debian to the topics docs > -> docs > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/156 > Should BaseProcessor default to None for string-returning methods? > -> enhancement, breaks-compat > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/148 > Implement callback to check the state of the socket in > fedmsg.tail_messages -> enhancement > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/137 > Askbot messages should distinguish between answer and comment > -> enhancement > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/119 > static analysis consumer > -> enhancement > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/114 > Add a g+ bot > -> enhancement > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/91 > Rename fedmsg to python-fedmsg in rpm-land. > -> obsolete? (fedmsg only contains doc and depends on python-* > packages) > > https://github.com/fedora-infra/fedmsg/issues/47 > fedmsg.text internationalization > -> enhancement > > > I'll go ahead and apply those labels (except the "obsolete" ones) but > I'd love to have your thoughts on them and on the general process. > Thanks! All those sound good to me. kevin pgpNMxFx9pToI.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: [PATCH] update owner-sync-pkgdb to support the docker namespace
We need this in order to move forward with layered images
Dennis
On miércoles, 2 de noviembre de 2016 10:34:10 PM CDT den...@ausil.us wrote:
> From: Dennis Gilmore
>
> update the script to sync from pkgdb to koji and enable it via a cronjob
>
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Gilmore
> ---
> roles/bodhi2/backend/tasks/main.yml| 8
> roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/owner-sync-pkgdb.j2 | 19 ---
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/tasks/main.yml
> b/roles/bodhi2/backend/tasks/main.yml index 421c16f..4fa662e 100644
> --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/tasks/main.yml
> +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/tasks/main.yml
> @@ -188,6 +188,14 @@
> cron_file=update-koji-owner-fedora
>when: inventory_hostname.startswith('bodhi-backend03') and env ==
> "production" tags:
> +
> + - name: sync packages from pkgdb2 to koji fedor (docker)
> +cron: name="owner-sync-fedora" minute="7,17,27,37,47,57" user="root"
> + job="/usr/local/bin/owner-sync-pkgdb
> f24-docker;/usr/local/bin/owner-sync-pkgdb
> f25-docker;/usr/local/bin/owner-sync-pkgdb f26-docker" +
> cron_file=update-koji-owner-fedora-docker
> +when: inventory_hostname.startswith('bodhi-backend03') and env ==
> "production" +tags:
> +- bodhi
>- bodhi
> #
> # cron job that syncs updates to master mirror
> diff --git a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/owner-sync-pkgdb.j2
> b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/owner-sync-pkgdb.j2 index 38ea282..3423aca
> 100755
> --- a/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/owner-sync-pkgdb.j2
> +++ b/roles/bodhi2/backend/templates/owner-sync-pkgdb.j2
> @@ -80,12 +80,17 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> print "ERROR: no tag specified!\n"
> usage()
>
> -if tag.startswith('epel'):
> -version = tag.split('epel')[1]
> -elif tag.startswith('f'):
> -version = tag.split('f')[1]
> +if 'docker' in tag:
> +namespace='docker'
> +version = tag.split('-')[0].split('f')[1]
> else:
> -version = tag.split('-')[1][:-1]
> +namespace='rpms'
> +if tag.startswith('epel'):
> +version = tag.split('epel')[1]
> +elif tag.startswith('f'):
> +version = tag.split('f')[1]
> +else:
> +version = tag.split('-')[1][:-1]
>
> data = requests.get(urljoin(BASEURL, 'api/collections'),
> verify=VERIFY).json() branch_names = set()
> @@ -109,7 +114,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> if version == rawhide:
> reponame = 'master'
> else:
> -reponame = tag
> +reponame = tag.split('-')[0]
> {% if env == 'staging' %}
> arches = ["primary"]
> {% else %}
> @@ -120,7 +125,7 @@ if __name__ == '__main__':
> sys.exit(1)
>
> data = requests.get(urljoin(BASEURL, 'api/vcs?format=json'),
> verify=VERIFY).json() -acls = data['rpms']
> +acls = data[namespace]
> pkgs = {}
> for pkg_name in acls:
> try:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:06:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 0. Whats your fedora account system login? wind85 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? Yes 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? Not yet, tough I have decided to write more SOPs, I feel like writing docs is a good way to know more about the fedora infrastructure inner workings. Of course there are a couple of groups I am more interested in than others. 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix Yes I wrote the SOP for the fedora-tagger. 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? Yes thanks. 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? Not that I can think of. I really find the guys on the irc really helpful and welcoming. 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? Finding information's regarding the infrastructure, tough not particularly. 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? All of them except one because I was sick and I could not attend. I find them really helpful especially now that the new "#topic Learn about: xxx" has been added to the meetings. 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our meeting agenda?https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby Yes. 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? Coffee probably, tough I don't dislike a cold beer :) . ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Migrating license agreement from FAS2 to FAS3
On 11/03/2016 07:18 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Good Morning Everyone, This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from FAS2 to FAS3. We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: - cla_dell - cla_done - cla_ibm - cla_fedora - cla_redhat - cla_click - cla_intel - cla_fpca For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement: `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 as having signed that new license agreement. The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by creating their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only interested in the FPCA group these days? Thoughts? From a usability standpoint, even though these groups are deprecated, I still see a notable number of new people apply to these groups (even if they're not employees of said companies). It can also be a little confusing with the FPCA in place too. If it's easy to do so, it's my opinion that it would make more sense to keep it all to one group. :) -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflo...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Migrating license agreement from FAS2 to FAS3
Good Morning Everyone, This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from FAS2 to FAS3. We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2: - cla_dell - cla_done - cla_ibm - cla_fedora - cla_redhat - cla_click - cla_intel - cla_fpca For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement: `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 as having signed that new license agreement. The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by creating their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only interested in the FPCA group these days? Thoughts? Thanks, Pierre signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
Hi all...my answers inline 0. Whats your fedora account system login? lousab 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? yes 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute to more? yes 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice 'easyfix' tickets? https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix Unfortunately not 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? yes :) 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help you do any of the above? no 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? Finding tickets in your interest area? 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them helpful or interesting? Unfortunately not recently 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby yes 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? coffee :) Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! kevin Thank you ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: November status update for Fedora Infrastructure Apprentices
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:06:19PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > You are getting this email because you are in the 'fi-apprentice' group > in the fedora account system (or are reading this on the > infrastructure list). > > Feel free to reply just directly to me, or cc the infrastructure list > for everyone to see and comment on. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_Apprentice > > At the first of every month(or so), I am going to be sending out an > email like this one. I would like feedback on how things are going for > you. > > I'd like to ask for everyone to send me a quick reply with the > following data or anything related you can think of that might help us > make the apprentice program more useful. > > 0. Whats your fedora account system login? fale > 1. Have you logged in and used your fi-apprentice membership to look at > our machines/setup in the last month? Do you plan to? Yes :) > 2. Has it helped you decide any area you wish to focus on or contribute > to more? Yeah, well, I already kind of knew it :) > 3. Have you looked at or been able to work on any of the fi-apprentice > 'easyfix' tickets? > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues?status=Open&tags=easyfix Yes, I kind of took a bug as well, but I can not assign it to me since Pagure thinks I should not do so. > 4. Do you still wish to be a member of the group? If not (for whatever > reason) could you provide any hints to help others down the road? Yep > 5. Is there any help or communication or ideas you have that would help > you do any of the above? Not really > 6. What do you find to be the hardest part of getting involved? > Finding things to work on? Getting attention from others to help you? > Finding tickets in your interest area? I think that some parts of the processes are not well documented, or their documentation is hard to find (and I have not yet found it). > 7. Have you been able to make any weekly irc meetings? Do you find them > helpful or interesting? Sadly they are in a moment of the week that is not very comfortable for me. > 8. Have you logged into our Gobby instance and read/seen/added to our > meeting agenda? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Gobby I've looked at the git version of it. > 9. Whats your favorite fall beverage? I'm not sure what a "fall beverage" is, but in the UK beer is very strong in fall (as in any other season), so I'll go for "beer" :D. Best, Fale > Any other general feedback is also quite welcome, including > improvements to this email, the wiki page, etc. > > Any folks I do not hear from in the next week will be removed from the > group. (Note that it's easy to be readded when you have time or > whatever and it's nothing at all personal, we just want to keep the > group up to date with active folks). > > Thanks, and looking forward to your feedback! > > kevin > ___ > infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Fabio Alessandro Locati Red Hat - Senior Consultant PGP Fingerprint: E815 3C49 2A8D FD8B 1CBD BC85 FDB3 DF20 B2DC 9C1B signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
How to move Fedora Badges from Trac
Hello all, I'm sending this out on a few different mailing lists, but it's something that will require participation and effort from a few different groups. I filed a ticket in the Fedora Infrastructure Pagure about migrating from Trac for Fedora Badges. This is picking up from an earlier discussion that Zach Villers (aikidouke) started on the mailing lists a couple months ago. In the ticket, I've tried to summarize the major pain points for migrating this Trac. A comprehensive overview can be found there. https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/5553 I would like to ask anyone who is involved with Fedora Badges, past or present, to please review this ticket and offer feedback to the issues raised in the ticket. I think of all the Tracs on FedoraHosted, this will be the most complex one to migrate because we have a lot of other components dependent on Trac or the FedoraHosted domain. It's important to start this discussion early than late. Even if you're not involved with Fedora Badges but might have ideas or advice on some of the problems raised here, your feedback would also be welcome! Thanks all. -- Cheers, Justin W. Flory jflo...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
