Re: status.fp.org concept

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 05:25:49PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 19. 05. 21 v 10:05 Ryan Lerch napsal(a):
> > What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was
> > re-implementing status
> > 
> > https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/
> 
> Oh, it already disappeared during datacenter migration.
> 
> This:
> 
> https://web.archive.org/web/20200521222937/https://status.fedoraproject.org/

You mean the link to nagios? Or ?

I'm a bit worried linking to nagios there will confuse people...

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Confirming Proposed Deadline for Mote Packaged for RHEL8

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 09:24:23AM +0530, Akashdeep Dhar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> 
> Since the last couple of weeks, I have restarted the work on Mote[1] with a 
> definitive checkpoint to package all changes made so far (which includes 
> porting to Python 3 and phasing out of the use of Memcached) in a version 
> bump 0.7.0, packaged for RHEL8. I have contacted Chaoyi Zha (FAS:cydrobolt) 
> and took up the packaging[2] task soon after but one of the first builds 
> failed[3] due to the intended non-availability of fedmsg on RHEL8.
> It would be some time before the CI would be converted[4] from Python 2 to 
> Python 3 with Tox, something that Jan Kuparen (FAS:copperi) is working on - 
> only after which the repo would be able to accept pushes/merges made against 
> the primary branch. I wish to ask if there is any proposed deadline for this 
> packaging task on RHEL8. If there is one, we would want to first discuss 
> deployment on a RHEL7 based container before the porting happens.

So, normally I don't think it would matter much since the current
version is working fine. 

However, this is kind of blocking fixing zodbot to use python3 and talk
to our new account system. ;( 

But I think I might see a hacky way we can avoid that problem... 

So, thanks for the information! Very much appreciated. 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: status.fp.org concept

[Miroslav Suchý]

Dne 19. 05. 21 v 10:05 Ryan Lerch napsal(a):

What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was
re-implementing status

https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/


Oh, it already disappeared during datacenter migration.

This:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200521222937/https://status.fedoraproject.org/

Miroslav
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: status.fp.org concept

[Ryan Lerch]

What is this link? I didn't see it on the old status when i was
re-implementing status

https://web.archive.org/web/20210414105928/https://status.fedoraproject.org/


cheers,
ryanlerch

On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 3:16 PM Miroslav Suchý  wrote:
>
> Dne 03. 05. 21 v 17:18 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> >
> > The reason we are changing is because of that list. Too many people expect 
> > us to know instantly that something is
> > broken, something like https://uptimerobot.com/  
> > that rocky linux uses. They also expect us
> > to be 24x7x365 coverage of every service on that list when we are more of a 
> > 8 hour US-East M-F sysadmin.
>
> That is reason why I added to old status.f.o the link to our monitoring some 
> times ago. You couldn't add the link back
> Ryan, could you?
>
> Miroslav
>
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure