On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 02:09:48PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 19. 05. 21 v 20:45 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > You mean the link to nagios? Or ?
>
> Yes. The link to older outages is not needed with new design.
>
> > I'm a bit worried linking to nagios there will confuse people...
>
> Why? When something does not work (for me) then I go to status.f.o, then to
> Nagios and only then I file an issue.
Sure, thats you or me or people who know about how things are setup.
But end users who don't would go to nagios and see:
Oh no, there's a blocking outage!
bvmhost-a64-10.iad2.fedoraproject.org is down. I wonder if thats why the
thing I wanted to do isn't working?
Or: pagure02.fedoraproject.org swap is low, could that be why the
getfedora site is loading slowly?
Anyhow, I guess I won't die on this hill... but can we at least put it
at the bottom with some kind of wording that doesn't get end users so
lost?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
