Re: AWS Snapshots without FedoraGroup tag

2023-11-03 Thread Miroslav Suchý

Dne 03. 11. 23 v 16:15 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):

Does that mean we should set ours to FedoraGroup=coreos ?


Yes. The values are not defined. I use the values to group the resources together. If you want you can even use two 
labels: coreos-dev, coreos-ci. Or just coreos. It is up to you.


--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: AWS Snapshots without FedoraGroup tag

2023-11-03 Thread Dusty Mabe


On 11/3/23 03:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 03. 11. 23 v 2:06 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
>> We'll clean up the ones we do not need soon. I'm sorry it is taking longer 
>> than we thought it would to
>> get garbage collection implemented.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> 
>> * Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-20190729.0.x86_64-hvm-us-east-1-standard-0 - is this 
>> snapshots used to generate AMIs for
>>> getfedora.org? Do we still need it?
>>>
>>> If you have snapshots that are important, please check that it have tag 
>>> FedoraGroup=*
>> Hmm. Is that required? If so, is it new? 
> 
> It is in our SOP for ages
> 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/aws-access/#_ec2
> 
> but so far no ones checked it and enforced.

Does that mean we should set ours to FedoraGroup=coreos ?

> 
>> When we (Fedora CoreOS Group) create AMIs we don't add tags
>> like this to our AMIs.
> 
> I am now focusing on Snapshots, but please add it to any resource.
> 
> When we started we have few resources there and it was easy to clean up 
> leftovers and identify owners. Now we have there thousands resources in dozen 
> regions. And it is hard to garbage collect resources and identify who is 
> responsible for consuming expensive resources. While this account is 
> sponsored by AWS it does not mean that we can misuse it and leave garbage 
> behind and let Amazon pay for that.
> 
> Miroslav
> 
> -- 
> Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
> Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
> 
> 
> ___
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: AWS Snapshots without FedoraGroup tag

2023-11-03 Thread Miroslav Suchý

Dne 03. 11. 23 v 2:06 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):

We'll clean up the ones we do not need soon. I'm sorry it is taking longer than 
we thought it would to
get garbage collection implemented.


Thank you.



* Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-20190729.0.x86_64-hvm-us-east-1-standard-0 - is this 
snapshots used to generate AMIs for

getfedora.org? Do we still need it?

If you have snapshots that are important, please check that it have tag 
FedoraGroup=*

Hmm. Is that required? If so, is it new?


It is in our SOP for ages

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/aws-access/#_ec2

but so far no ones checked it and enforced.


When we (Fedora CoreOS Group) create AMIs we don't add tags
like this to our AMIs.


I am now focusing on Snapshots, but please add it to any resource.

When we started we have few resources there and it was easy to clean up leftovers and identify owners. Now we have there 
thousands resources in dozen regions. And it is hard to garbage collect resources and identify who is responsible for 
consuming expensive resources. While this account is sponsored by AWS it does not mean that we can misuse it and leave 
garbage behind and let Amazon pay for that.


Miroslav

--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue