Bugzilla and Groups

2023-12-21 Thread Tim Flink

What are the general rules around default bugzilla assignee for packages? I'm 
trying to set the default assignee for rocm-cmake to rocm-packagers-sig but 
keep getting an error:

Unable to update the bugzilla assignee(s): Invalid user or group name as 
fedora_assignee

As far as I know, rocm-packagers-sig is a pkgdb group. Do I need to request a 
change to the group for it to be the default bugzilla assignee? Is setting a 
group as the default assignee against some policy that I don't know about?

My search-fu has been failing me on this so I figured I would ask to see if 
someone here has an answer.

Thanks,

Tim
--
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Bugzilla and Groups

2023-12-22 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 01:19:46PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:
> What are the general rules around default bugzilla assignee for packages? I'm 
> trying to set the default assignee for rocm-cmake to rocm-packagers-sig but 
> keep getting an error:
> 
> Unable to update the bugzilla assignee(s): Invalid user or group name as 
> fedora_assignee
> 
> As far as I know, rocm-packagers-sig is a pkgdb group. Do I need to request a 
> change to the group for it to be the default bugzilla assignee? Is setting a 
> group as the default assignee against some policy that I don't know about?
> 
> My search-fu has been failing me on this so I figured I would ask to see if 
> someone here has an answer.

I think this is a interface confusion... when adding a group as bugzilla
asignee, you have to prefix it with @

If you do that does it work?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


Re: Bugzilla and Groups

2023-12-23 Thread Tim Flink



On 12/22/23 10:55, Kevin Fenzi wrote:

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 01:19:46PM -0700, Tim Flink wrote:

What are the general rules around default bugzilla assignee for packages? I'm 
trying to set the default assignee for rocm-cmake to rocm-packagers-sig but 
keep getting an error:

Unable to update the bugzilla assignee(s): Invalid user or group name as 
fedora_assignee

As far as I know, rocm-packagers-sig is a pkgdb group. Do I need to request a 
change to the group for it to be the default bugzilla assignee? Is setting a 
group as the default assignee against some policy that I don't know about?

My search-fu has been failing me on this so I figured I would ask to see if 
someone here has an answer.


I think this is a interface confusion... when adding a group as bugzilla
asignee, you have to prefix it with @

If you do that does it work?

kevin


If I prefix the group with @, that does work.

Thanks,

Tim
--
___
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue