Re: Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-09-12)
On 09/16/2013 04:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: When we first setup our cloud, we setup the storage for volumes on just the head node. The other 5 nodes in the mix also have storage. Over time we added another nodes storage to it, but haven't done anything with the other 4. Thats a bit spread out however, volumes can only be on one of them, so while it allows for more volumes, it doesn't allow for one really large volume. Ideal setup for GlusterFS, I would say. Our cloud setup is isolated from the rest of the network in the datacenter it's at. So, for example it couldn't talk to any of our netapp storage or the like. :( -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-09-12)
On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:25:04 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 09/13/2013 06:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > I think we can pretty much look at opening it up where it is, then > > see how things are resource wise before announcing it more widely? > > *nod* > Only thing what worries me is disk space. > Currently I have from Fedora Cloud 200 GB. According to my > calculations this will last 20 days. So I'm looking for more disk > space now. I know I can get little bit more from Fedora Cloud, but > I'm looking for something in order of terabytes. I have some > negotiations running right now, we will see... But if you know about > few terabytes which are laying around, then let me know :) :) There's also some other considerations here: When we first setup our cloud, we setup the storage for volumes on just the head node. The other 5 nodes in the mix also have storage. Over time we added another nodes storage to it, but haven't done anything with the other 4. Thats a bit spread out however, volumes can only be on one of them, so while it allows for more volumes, it doesn't allow for one really large volume. Our cloud setup is isolated from the rest of the network in the datacenter it's at. So, for example it couldn't talk to any of our netapp storage or the like. We have had an offer to use another cloud in RH, it might be a good place to setup a more 'production' coprs if we decide to use it. See: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meetbot/meetbot/teams/infrastructure/infrastructure.2013-09-12-19.00.log.html#l-175 for more info. I'm not sure how much disk we could get there, but might be a good deal more than we have in our private cloud. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-09-12)
On 09/13/2013 06:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I think we can pretty much look at opening it up where it is, then see how things are resource wise before announcing it more widely? *nod* Only thing what worries me is disk space. Currently I have from Fedora Cloud 200 GB. According to my calculations this will last 20 days. So I'm looking for more disk space now. I know I can get little bit more from Fedora Cloud, but I'm looking for something in order of terabytes. I have some negotiations running right now, we will see... But if you know about few terabytes which are laying around, then let me know :) -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-09-12)
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:42:18 +0200 Miroslav Suchý wrote: > On 09/12/2013 09:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > 19:39:45 I think that's the idea > > 19:39:51 make a first release of copr > > 19:39:55 have people start to use it > > 19:40:01 integrate it into koji later on > > Yes this is true. > I am using current code and polishing it for public roll out. Great. > After it will go public, I will start next phase when I will try to > merge it with koji code. But that is far future. Right. > My goal is to go public at the end of this month or begging of next > one. We will see. ok. > I want to join your meetings, I will start with next one. > Hopefully I will manage to prepare RFR by that time. Excellent. copr will be slightly different for the RFR process, since it's designed to live and run in the cloud, so it wouldn't make much sense for it to go through staging and production like other web apps. I think we can pretty much look at opening it up where it is, then see how things are resource wise before announcing it more widely? kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-09-12)
On 09/12/2013 09:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: 19:39:45 I think that's the idea 19:39:51 make a first release of copr 19:39:55 have people start to use it 19:40:01 integrate it into koji later on Yes this is true. I am using current code and polishing it for public roll out. After it will go public, I will start next phase when I will try to merge it with koji code. But that is far future. My goal is to go public at the end of this month or begging of next one. We will see. I want to join your meetings, I will start with next one. Hopefully I will manage to prepare RFR by that time. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys ___ infrastructure mailing list infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
Summary/Minutes from today's Fedora Infrastructure meeting (2013-09-12)
#fedora-meeting: Infrastructure (2013-09-12) Meeting started by nirik at 19:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2013-09-12/infrastructure.2013-09-12-19.00.log.html . Meeting summary --- * welcome y'all (nirik, 19:00:01) * New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks (nirik, 19:02:00) * Applications status / discussion (nirik, 19:11:27) * LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1055 (nirik, 19:20:28) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Search (nirik, 19:20:34) * pkgdb2 work moving forward nicely (nirik, 19:26:24) * discussion about search engines again. (nirik, 19:26:32) * mobile search of docs and ask desired. (nirik, 19:26:47) * more badges improvements landing soon. (nirik, 19:29:38) * more easyfix tickets needed. (nirik, 19:29:51) * Sysadmin status / discussion (nirik, 19:30:36) * work on aarch64 koji moving forward slowly (nirik, 19:30:52) * new bladecenter still not online. Hopefully someday. (nirik, 19:31:18) * will send info about another cloud we could use for our items to list (nirik, 19:41:44) * will mail about opening up coprs to wider use (nirik, 19:41:57) * Upcoming Tasks/Items (nirik, 19:44:30) * LINK: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/list/infrastructure/ (nirik, 19:44:31) * Open Floor (nirik, 19:45:42) Meeting ended at 19:51:05 UTC. Action Items Action Items, by person --- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --- * nirik (101) * pingou (40) * threebean (15) * anshprat (15) * echevemaster (13) * ianweller (11) * frankieonuonga (11) * lnovich (11) * smooge (7) * zodbot (6) * adimania (4) * puiterwijk (4) * abadger1999 (4) * oddshocks (4) * tflink (4) * mattjones (3) * dgilmore (2) * EvilBob (1) * relrod (1) * lmacken (0) * mdomsch (0) -- 19:00:01 #startmeeting Infrastructure (2013-09-12) 19:00:01 Meeting started Thu Sep 12 19:00:01 2013 UTC. The chair is nirik. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 19:00:01 Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 19:00:01 #meetingname infrastructure 19:00:01 #topic welcome y'all 19:00:01 #chair smooge relrod nirik abadger1999 lmacken dgilmore mdomsch threebean pingou puiterwijk 19:00:01 The meeting name has been set to 'infrastructure' 19:00:01 Current chairs: abadger1999 dgilmore lmacken mdomsch nirik pingou puiterwijk relrod smooge threebean 19:00:08 * threebean is here 19:00:15 .hellomynameis puiterwijk 19:00:16 puiterwijk: puiterwijk 'Patrick Uiterwijk' 19:00:21 * pingou here 19:00:24 * adimania is here 19:00:24 hi 19:00:32 * echevemaster here 19:00:39 hi 19:00:40 * lnovich here 19:01:04 welcome everyone. 19:01:09 .hellomynameis bob 19:01:11 smooge: bob 'Sylvain Baubeau' 19:01:27 heh. no it's not. ;) 19:01:30 hi guys 19:01:32 hola 19:01:35 Mine is... 19:01:36 greetings from Kenya 19:02:00 #topic New folks introductions and Apprentice tasks 19:02:02 * tflink is lurking 19:02:19 any new folks want to introduce themselves? or apprentices/new folks with questions or comments? 19:02:22 hello everyone, my name is Matt. 19:02:40 I work in monioring by day and hack Icinga by and python bynight 19:02:41 hi everyone - I am Laura 19:02:53 * anshprat is a new introduction , waiting 19:03:17 mattjones / lnovich / anshprat: welcome! :) 19:03:23 :) 19:03:24 finished a couple of tasks around tagger puppet module. Waiting for freeze to finish. 19:03:34 ! 19:03:47 echevemaster: feel free to chime in anytime... 19:03:53 * relrod checks in, but has to leave to take his mom to an appointment - will read meeting minutes later tonight. 19:04:04 My name is echevemaster 19:04:27 frankieonuonga: btw, I've seen you've been doing some work on copr :-) 19:04:30 I want join to noc and apps team 19:04:44 great. Welcome echevemaster too. ;) 19:04:56 all new folks: if you haven't already seen it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/GettingStarted 19:05:34 yeah, thanks nirik 19:05:35 question for new folks: are you more interested in sysadmin tasks or application development tasks? 19:05:45 abadger1999: yescan we kindly follow meeting..sorry to be so rude...I just dont want to piss guys off..I can discuss in later section or private chat. 19:06:26 * anshprat apps dev + tools . and can contribute to sysadmin as that's my day job :P 19:06:41 frankieonuonga: No problems :-) 19:06:58 of my part apps 19:07:12 I would like to help with monitoring or possibly releng 19:07:21 but I can help in sysadmin task too, sure 19:07:29 nirik - as much as I would love to ... not a good idea for me - way too new in the sysadmin realm - I am on the docs team and was hoping to see how ready things are 19:08:04 well we actually coul
