Hi Maren,
Out of curiosity, when you type "wik" in you browser, how does it
know to find the Inkscape wiki, and not Wikipedia, or Wikimedia, or some
other program's wiki, etc?
If users are looking to the Roadmap as "set in stone" then they
simply need to be informed properly. For as long as I've been using
Inkscape (8 years), the wiki has been a resource for both users and
developers. Most of them have no idea that it's being groomed as 'developer
only'. Ask Martin how many times I asked him to confirm that, Yes, the wiki
will only be for developers. At least 4 or 5, as I recall. **It's a
radical change, and afaik, I'm the only user who knows that.**
Not only do I have a list of wiki articles that are user-related,
that are linked from the FAQ (attached), I actually started to make a list
of ALL wiki articles that are for users. But I started getting tripped up
when I came to things I didn't understand, and wasn't sure if they were for
users or not.
I would be glad to start working on that again, if I could get some
guidance from you, on pages where I have questions. All I could do is make
a list, but that might be a starting place for someone else?
(Note that when I first started working on the FAQ, I don't think
you were involved yet. After I announced some of my work on the dev mailing
list, it was Bryce who said that if I found info in the wiki which really
should be in the documentation, to make note of it. It's possible that it's
not appropriate for some of this to be documented, but that was my best
understanding at the time.)
I guess the FAQ would be my best idea as the best place for the
Roadmap to be linked, if it should not be on the website. But it would go a
long way towards preventing users from thinking it's "a done deal" by
putting a simple sentence at the top of the page, to that effect. That
could also be said in the faq.
I was just about to add those couple of links I've been putting off
adding. So shall I make the new faq item for the roadmap, while I'm at it?
- You're quite hardy :)
I've internally categorized most of the Wiki pages as 'outdated' or
'describing a plan, but not necessarily the real implementation'...
Inkscape forums can be quite competitive, as to who gets the right answer.
Although it's never really verbalized, many are aware!
Where can I look to find out whether a page is outdated or describing a
plan?
Could you keep track of the kind of info you are looking up, so we can
maybe find a way to include the main components on the website?
I don't remember everything I've looked up, but once was info about the new
Symbols dialog. And if the new manual comes out pretty soon, I won't have
to go to the wiki anymore.
This is a whole other subject, but I wish we had like a team to
write the manual, so it wouldn't all be on 1 person's shoulders! I mean,
Inkscape really should have it's own "official manual", rather than an
"official" manual. And imo, the official manual should be on the website.
But again, that's another subject.
Thanks,
brynn
--
From: "Maren Hachmann"
Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 12:46 PM
To: "Brynn" ;
Subject: Re: [Inkscape-docs] more prominent link to the wiki?
Hi Brynn,
Am 19.06.2015 um 05:19 schrieb Brynn:
Hi Maren,
Yes, I understand that the intent for the wiki is more for
developers. I didn't mean there should be a more prominent link for
users to get to the wiki. I meant for developers, but others could use
it too.
- Mmh. For devs, the link isn't too hidden, I think:
https://inkscape.org/en/develop/ , fourth paragraph
(but also new devs should not rely on the info in the Wiki being up to
date).
I usually just type 'wik' into my browser's address line, and then
autocompletion kicks in...
I don't know. Maybe developers just don't need to go from
website to wiki. Maybe it's just me.
But fwiw, what I'm looking for most often is the Release Notes,
- I think that for the next version we could try and get the Release
Notes on the website when they are finalized. They are an important part
of the documentation. This will also make it easier for our translators'
team (who have access to website editing, but most don't have wiki
privileges) to translate them (translating Release Notes is a difficult
task by itself...).
Roadmap,
- The Roadmap is being changed by devs all the time - and users should
not rely on it too much - but unfortunately, they often take it by the
letter, and are then disappointed... It's good info, but I'm a bit
hesitant to put it on the website. Is there a place on the website which
could profit from a direct link to the Roadmap?
(maybe: The Next Release, FAQ, Features?)
and I often search the wiki while trying to answer support
questions from forums.
- You're quite hardy :)
I've internally categorized most of the Wiki pages as 'outda
