Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch V2 14/29] dm bufio: Simplify stack trace retrieval

2019-04-20 Thread Alexander Potapenko
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 1:54 PM Thomas Gleixner  wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2019, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Gleixner  wrote:
> > > -   save_stack_trace(>stack_trace);
> > > +   b->stack_len = stack_trace_save(b->stack_entries, MAX_STACK, 2);
> > As noted in one of similar patches before, can we have an inline
> > comment to indicate what does this "2" stand for?
>
> Come on. We have gazillion of functions which take numerical constant
> arguments. Should we add comments to all of them?
Ok, sorry. I might not be familiar enough with the kernel style guide.
> Thanks,
>
> tglx



-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [patch V2 14/29] dm bufio: Simplify stack trace retrieval

2019-04-20 Thread Alexander Potapenko
On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:06 AM Thomas Gleixner  wrote:
>
> Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace with an invocation of
> the storage array based interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner 
> Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
> Cc: Mike Snitzer 
> Cc: Alasdair Kergon 
> ---
>  drivers/md/dm-bufio.c |   15 ++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
> @@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ struct dm_buffer {
> void (*end_io)(struct dm_buffer *, blk_status_t);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING
>  #define MAX_STACK 10
> -   struct stack_trace stack_trace;
> +   unsigned int stack_len;
> unsigned long stack_entries[MAX_STACK];
>  #endif
>  };
> @@ -232,11 +232,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(dm_bufio_clients_loc
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING
>  static void buffer_record_stack(struct dm_buffer *b)
>  {
> -   b->stack_trace.nr_entries = 0;
> -   b->stack_trace.max_entries = MAX_STACK;
> -   b->stack_trace.entries = b->stack_entries;
> -   b->stack_trace.skip = 2;
> -   save_stack_trace(>stack_trace);
> +   b->stack_len = stack_trace_save(b->stack_entries, MAX_STACK, 2);
As noted in one of similar patches before, can we have an inline
comment to indicate what does this "2" stand for?
>  }
>  #endif
>
> @@ -438,7 +434,7 @@ static struct dm_buffer *alloc_buffer(st
> adjust_total_allocated(b->data_mode, (long)c->block_size);
>
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING
> -   memset(>stack_trace, 0, sizeof(b->stack_trace));
> +   b->stack_len = 0;
>  #endif
> return b;
>  }
> @@ -1520,8 +1516,9 @@ static void drop_buffers(struct dm_bufio
> DMERR("leaked buffer %llx, hold count %u, list %d",
>   (unsigned long long)b->block, b->hold_count, i);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DM_DEBUG_BLOCK_STACK_TRACING
> -   print_stack_trace(>stack_trace, 1);
> -   b->hold_count = 0; /* mark unclaimed to avoid BUG_ON 
> below */
> +       stack_trace_print(b->stack_entries, b->stack_len, 1);
> +   /* mark unclaimed to avoid BUG_ON below */
> +   b->hold_count = 0;
>  #endif
> }
>
>
>


-- 
Alexander Potapenko
Software Engineer

Google Germany GmbH
Erika-Mann-Straße, 33
80636 München

Geschäftsführer: Paul Manicle, Halimah DeLaine Prado
Registergericht und -nummer: Hamburg, HRB 86891
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx