Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: Fix the build failure in kvmgt.

2021-02-08 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2021.02.09 02:52:10 +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> Previously, commit 531810caa9f4 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Use
> an rwlock for the x86 MMU") replaced KVM's mmu_lock
> with type rwlock_t. This will cause a build failure
> in kvmgt, which uses the same lock when trying to add/
> remove some GFNs to/from the page tracker. Fix it with
> write_lock/unlocks in kvmgt.

Thanks for the fix! I saw Paolo has already carried one
in -next, so we are fine.

> 
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell 
> Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 12 ++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> index 60f1a386dd06..b4348256ae95 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
> @@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_add(unsigned long handle, 
> u64 gfn)
>   return -EINVAL;
>   }
>  
> - spin_lock(>mmu_lock);
> + write_lock(>mmu_lock);
>  
>   if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
>   goto out;
> @@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_add(unsigned long handle, 
> u64 gfn)
>   kvmgt_protect_table_add(info, gfn);
>  
>  out:
> - spin_unlock(>mmu_lock);
> + write_unlock(>mmu_lock);
>   srcu_read_unlock(>srcu, idx);
>   return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_remove(unsigned long 
> handle, u64 gfn)
>   return -EINVAL;
>   }
>  
> - spin_lock(>mmu_lock);
> + write_lock(>mmu_lock);
>  
>   if (!kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
>   goto out;
> @@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_remove(unsigned long 
> handle, u64 gfn)
>   kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
>  
>  out:
> - spin_unlock(>mmu_lock);
> + write_unlock(>mmu_lock);
>   srcu_read_unlock(>srcu, idx);
>   return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
>   struct kvmgt_guest_info *info = container_of(node,
>   struct kvmgt_guest_info, track_node);
>  
> - spin_lock(>mmu_lock);
> + write_lock(>mmu_lock);
>   for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
>   gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
>   if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn)) {
> @@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
>   kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
>   }
>   }
> - spin_unlock(>mmu_lock);
> + write_unlock(>mmu_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static bool __kvmgt_vgpu_exist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, struct kvm *kvm)
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt: Fix the build failure in kvmgt.

2021-02-08 Thread Yu Zhang
Previously, commit 531810caa9f4 ("KVM: x86/mmu: Use
an rwlock for the x86 MMU") replaced KVM's mmu_lock
with type rwlock_t. This will cause a build failure
in kvmgt, which uses the same lock when trying to add/
remove some GFNs to/from the page tracker. Fix it with
write_lock/unlocks in kvmgt.

Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell 
Signed-off-by: Yu Zhang 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c | 12 ++--
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
index 60f1a386dd06..b4348256ae95 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/kvmgt.c
@@ -1703,7 +1703,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_add(unsigned long handle, u64 
gfn)
return -EINVAL;
}
 
-   spin_lock(>mmu_lock);
+   write_lock(>mmu_lock);
 
if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
goto out;
@@ -1712,7 +1712,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_add(unsigned long handle, u64 
gfn)
kvmgt_protect_table_add(info, gfn);
 
 out:
-   spin_unlock(>mmu_lock);
+   write_unlock(>mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(>srcu, idx);
return 0;
 }
@@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_remove(unsigned long handle, 
u64 gfn)
return -EINVAL;
}
 
-   spin_lock(>mmu_lock);
+   write_lock(>mmu_lock);
 
if (!kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn))
goto out;
@@ -1746,7 +1746,7 @@ static int kvmgt_page_track_remove(unsigned long handle, 
u64 gfn)
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
 
 out:
-   spin_unlock(>mmu_lock);
+   write_unlock(>mmu_lock);
srcu_read_unlock(>srcu, idx);
return 0;
 }
@@ -1772,7 +1772,7 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvmgt_guest_info *info = container_of(node,
struct kvmgt_guest_info, track_node);
 
-   spin_lock(>mmu_lock);
+   write_lock(>mmu_lock);
for (i = 0; i < slot->npages; i++) {
gfn = slot->base_gfn + i;
if (kvmgt_gfn_is_write_protected(info, gfn)) {
@@ -1781,7 +1781,7 @@ static void kvmgt_page_track_flush_slot(struct kvm *kvm,
kvmgt_protect_table_del(info, gfn);
}
}
-   spin_unlock(>mmu_lock);
+   write_unlock(>mmu_lock);
 }
 
 static bool __kvmgt_vgpu_exist(struct intel_vgpu *vgpu, struct kvm *kvm)
-- 
2.17.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx