Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Ensure we don't clamp a random offset to 32b

2019-07-10 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson  writes:

> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-07-10 16:34:23)
>> Chris Wilson  writes:
>> 
>> > Specify that we do want a 64b value for sizeof(u32) as we want to
>> > compute the mask of the upper 62bits.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
>> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala 
>> > ---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
>> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c 
>> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>> > index 3abe15a08b6d..275ec1bfc2be 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
>> > @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ static int igt_vm_isolation(void *arg)
>> >  
>> >   div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(),
>> > vm_total, );
>> > - offset &= -sizeof(u32);
>> > + offset &= -(u64)sizeof(u32);
>> 
>> Taking a sizeof of something we know the size of.
>
> u32 is a proxy for dword, and I was just trying to be more expressive
> that we want the address aligned to a dword for the MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM
> used. alignof_dword maybe?

I was being a bit snarky. It is more expressive than -4 indeed.
Compromise as we dont have a define for natural aligment for
command streamer memory access.

-Mika

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Ensure we don't clamp a random offset to 32b

2019-07-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-07-10 16:34:23)
> Chris Wilson  writes:
> 
> > Specify that we do want a 64b value for sizeof(u32) as we want to
> > compute the mask of the upper 62bits.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
> > Cc: Mika Kuoppala 
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c 
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
> > index 3abe15a08b6d..275ec1bfc2be 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
> > @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ static int igt_vm_isolation(void *arg)
> >  
> >   div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(),
> > vm_total, );
> > - offset &= -sizeof(u32);
> > + offset &= -(u64)sizeof(u32);
> 
> Taking a sizeof of something we know the size of.

u32 is a proxy for dword, and I was just trying to be more expressive
that we want the address aligned to a dword for the MI_STORE_DWORD_IMM
used. alignof_dword maybe?
-Chris
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Ensure we don't clamp a random offset to 32b

2019-07-10 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson  writes:

> Specify that we do want a 64b value for sizeof(u32) as we want to
> compute the mask of the upper 62bits.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala 
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
> index 3abe15a08b6d..275ec1bfc2be 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
> @@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ static int igt_vm_isolation(void *arg)
>  
>   div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(),
> vm_total, );
> - offset &= -sizeof(u32);
> + offset &= -(u64)sizeof(u32);

Taking a sizeof of something we know the size of.
Ok enough! Back to business:

should be the same for 64bit, but make sure for 32.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala 


>   offset += I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
>  
>   err = write_to_scratch(ctx_a, engine,
> -- 
> 2.22.0
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Ensure we don't clamp a random offset to 32b

2019-07-10 Thread Chris Wilson
Specify that we do want a 64b value for sizeof(u32) as we want to
compute the mask of the upper 62bits.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
Cc: Mika Kuoppala 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
index 3abe15a08b6d..275ec1bfc2be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1539,7 +1539,7 @@ static int igt_vm_isolation(void *arg)
 
div64_u64_rem(i915_prandom_u64_state(),
  vm_total, );
-   offset &= -sizeof(u32);
+   offset &= -(u64)sizeof(u32);
offset += I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE;
 
err = write_to_scratch(ctx_a, engine,
-- 
2.22.0

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx