Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:45:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >> >> > In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for >> >> > example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so >> >> > declaring >> >> > the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our >> >> > flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous >> >> > writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before >> >> > executing the next command". >> >> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson >> >> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> >> >> >> Do we have an igt/piglit failing somewhere (igt kinda preferred) or a >> >> bugzilla or why is this cc: stable? >> > >> > I get GPU hangs on byt without flushing these writes (running ue4). >> > piglit has examples where the flush is required for correct rendering. >> >> Daniel, does this satisfy your question? We've had an r-b from Ville for >> a long time. > > Yeah, just add that bit to the commit message to justify cc: stable. Pushed to drm-intel-fixes, thanks for the patch and review. BR, Jani. > -Daniel > -- > Daniel Vetter > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation > http://blog.ffwll.ch -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:45:58PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Chris Wilson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > >> > In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for > >> > example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so declaring > >> > the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our > >> > flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous > >> > writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before > >> > executing the next command". > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > >> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > >> > >> Do we have an igt/piglit failing somewhere (igt kinda preferred) or a > >> bugzilla or why is this cc: stable? > > > > I get GPU hangs on byt without flushing these writes (running ue4). > > piglit has examples where the flush is required for correct rendering. > > Daniel, does this satisfy your question? We've had an r-b from Ville for > a long time. Yeah, just add that bit to the commit message to justify cc: stable. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: >> > In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for >> > example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so declaring >> > the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our >> > flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous >> > writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before >> > executing the next command". >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson >> > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org >> >> Do we have an igt/piglit failing somewhere (igt kinda preferred) or a >> bugzilla or why is this cc: stable? > > I get GPU hangs on byt without flushing these writes (running ue4). > piglit has examples where the flush is required for correct rendering. Daniel, does this satisfy your question? We've had an r-b from Ville for a long time. BR, Jani. > -Chris > > -- > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang...@intel.com) Task id: 7243 -Summary- Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied ILK 302/302 302/302 SNB 315/315 315/315 IVB 336/336 336/336 BYT 283/283 283/283 HSW 378/378 378/378 -Detailed- Platform Testdrm-intel-nightly Series Applied Note: You need to pay more attention to line start with '*' ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 11:16:34AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for > > example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so declaring > > the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our > > flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous > > writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before > > executing the next command". > > > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org > > Do we have an igt/piglit failing somewhere (igt kinda preferred) or a > bugzilla or why is this cc: stable? I get GPU hangs on byt without flushing these writes (running ue4). piglit has examples where the flush is required for correct rendering. -Chris -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for > example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so declaring > the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our > flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous > writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before > executing the next command". > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Do we have an igt/piglit failing somewhere (igt kinda preferred) or a bugzilla or why is this cc: stable? -Daniel > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c| 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > index 01cf0ca21990..e0c19d75b196 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > @@ -1771,6 +1771,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct > drm_i915_gem_request *request, > if (flush_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; > + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; > } > > if (invalidate_domains) { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index c2392f6c4204..551af7399ca1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ gen7_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, > if (flush_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; > + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; > } > if (invalidate_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE; > @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ gen8_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, > if (flush_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; > + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; > } > if (invalidate_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE; > -- > 2.5.0 > > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 04:08:41PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for > example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so declaring > the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our > flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous > writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before > executing the next command". > > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson > Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org Yeah makes as much sense as anything about pipecontrols. Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä Though the spec makes me thing it would be even more appropriate if we did the seqno write using a post-sync operation and followed it with such a pipecontrol flush. But I've not actually played around with this stuff, so can't say for sure. Oh and we're also lacking DC flushes everywhere, in case someone cares. > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c| 1 + > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > index 01cf0ca21990..e0c19d75b196 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c > @@ -1771,6 +1771,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct > drm_i915_gem_request *request, > if (flush_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; > + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; > } > > if (invalidate_domains) { > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > index c2392f6c4204..551af7399ca1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c > @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ gen7_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, > if (flush_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; > + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; > } > if (invalidate_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE; > @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ gen8_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, > if (flush_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; > + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; > } > if (invalidate_domains) { > flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE; > -- > 2.5.0 > > ___ > Intel-gfx mailing list > Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush pipecontrol post-sync writes
In order to flush the results from in-batch pipecontrol writes (used for example in glQuery) before declaring the batch complete (and so declaring the query results coherent), we need to set the FlushEnable bit in our flushing pipecontrol. The FlushEnable bit "waits until all previous writes of immediate data from post-sync circles are complete before executing the next command". Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c| 1 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c index 01cf0ca21990..e0c19d75b196 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c @@ -1771,6 +1771,7 @@ static int gen8_emit_flush_render(struct drm_i915_gem_request *request, if (flush_domains) { flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; } if (invalidate_domains) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c index c2392f6c4204..551af7399ca1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.c @@ -330,6 +330,7 @@ gen7_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, if (flush_domains) { flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; } if (invalidate_domains) { flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE; @@ -401,6 +402,7 @@ gen8_render_ring_flush(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req, if (flush_domains) { flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_RENDER_TARGET_CACHE_FLUSH; flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_DEPTH_CACHE_FLUSH; + flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_FLUSH_ENABLE; } if (invalidate_domains) { flags |= PIPE_CONTROL_TLB_INVALIDATE; -- 2.5.0 ___ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx