Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename block_size()/block_offset()

2022-05-23 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 19 May 2022, Ville Syrjala  wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä 
>
> Give block_size()/block_offset() a "raw_" prefix since they
> both operate on the "raw" (as in not duplicated) BDB block
> contents.
>
> What actually spurred this was a conflict between intel_bios.c
> block_size() vs. block_size() from blkdev.h. That only
> happend to me on a custom tree where we somehow manage to
> include blkdev.h into intel_bios.c. But I think the rename
> makes sense anyway to clarify the purpose of these functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä 

Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula 

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 8 
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> index 0c5638f5b72b..3ac1860a0b6e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
> @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ find_raw_section(const void *_bdb, enum bdb_block_id 
> section_id)
>   * Offset from the start of BDB to the start of the
>   * block data (just past the block header).
>   */
> -static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
> +static u32 raw_block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
>  {
>   const void *block;
>  
> @@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum 
> bdb_block_id section_id)
>  }
>  
>  /* size of the block excluding the header */
> -static u32 block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
> +static u32 raw_block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
>  {
>   const void *block;
>  
> @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
>   int data_block_size, lfp_data_size;
>   int i;
>  
> - data_block_size = block_size(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> + data_block_size = raw_block_size(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
>   if (data_block_size == 0)
>   return false;
>  
> @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void 
> *ptrs_block)
>   u32 offset;
>   int i;
>  
> - offset = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
> + offset = raw_block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
>  
>   for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>   if (ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset < offset ||

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rename block_size()/block_offset()

2022-05-19 Thread Ville Syrjala
From: Ville Syrjälä 

Give block_size()/block_offset() a "raw_" prefix since they
both operate on the "raw" (as in not duplicated) BDB block
contents.

What actually spurred this was a conflict between intel_bios.c
block_size() vs. block_size() from blkdev.h. That only
happend to me on a custom tree where we somehow manage to
include blkdev.h into intel_bios.c. But I think the rename
makes sense anyway to clarify the purpose of these functions.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä 
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c | 8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
index 0c5638f5b72b..3ac1860a0b6e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bios.c
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ find_raw_section(const void *_bdb, enum bdb_block_id 
section_id)
  * Offset from the start of BDB to the start of the
  * block data (just past the block header).
  */
-static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
+static u32 raw_block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
 {
const void *block;
 
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ static u32 block_offset(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id 
section_id)
 }
 
 /* size of the block excluding the header */
-static u32 block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
+static u32 raw_block_size(const void *bdb, enum bdb_block_id section_id)
 {
const void *block;
 
@@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ static bool validate_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb,
int data_block_size, lfp_data_size;
int i;
 
-   data_block_size = block_size(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
+   data_block_size = raw_block_size(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
if (data_block_size == 0)
return false;
 
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static bool fixup_lfp_data_ptrs(const void *bdb, void 
*ptrs_block)
u32 offset;
int i;
 
-   offset = block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
+   offset = raw_block_offset(bdb, BDB_LVDS_LFP_DATA);
 
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
if (ptrs->ptr[i].fp_timing.offset < offset ||
-- 
2.35.1