Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 06:14:23PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > On 06.09.2022 16:43, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:36:05PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:14:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:57:37PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > On 06.09.2022 13:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or > >> disabling > >> async update is always performed on vblank, > > It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. > > need_async_flip_disable_wa). > On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > ... > On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing > run of > this test, last seen at: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > Similar for SKL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit > of > PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and > the > changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. > >>> It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > >>> > So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > > [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > >> but if async update is enabled > >> PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to > >> PLANE_SURF > >> when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > >> On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we > >> need to > >> write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value > >> should > >> be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > > I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > > flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. > >>> When it works as designed it should: > >>> 1. turn off the async flip bit > >>> 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched > >>> 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally > >> After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane > >> states > >> are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa > >> so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected > >> planes and w/a does not work at all. > >> I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. > >> Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is > >> just blind shot: > >> > >> @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device > >> *dev, > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > >> > >> if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != > >> old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > >> + > >> + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); > >> + if (ret) > >> + goto fail; > >> } > >> > >> intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); > >> > >> ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); > > ^ > > This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged > > for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to > > add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). > This is no-modeset
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On 06.09.2022 16:43, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:36:05PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:14:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:57:37PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 06.09.2022 13:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling
async update is always performed on vblank,
It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa).
On CFL it is reported every drmtip run:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html
...
On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of
this test, last seen at:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html
Similar for SKL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html
I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of
PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the
changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1.
It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl.
So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm.
[1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656
but if async update is enabled
PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF
when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors.
On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to
write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should
be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank.
I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async
flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes.
I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in
figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early.
When it works as designed it should:
1. turn off the async flip bit
2. wait for vblank so that gets latched
3. do the sync plane update/disable normally
After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states
are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa
so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected
planes and w/a does not work at all.
I have no idea where affected plane states should be added.
Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is
just blind shot:
@@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device
*dev,
new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter !=
old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter)
new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true;
+
+ ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc);
+ if (ret)
+ goto fail;
}
intel_vrr_check_modeset(state);
ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base);
^
This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged
for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to
add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()).
This is no-modeset scenario, drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset does not
add planes in this case.
Then he mystery is how intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa() manages
to not disable async flip for some planes...
After a few minutes of pondering I have a theory:
1. async flip on plane 1
crtc_state.*async_flip: false -> true
2. sync flip on plane 2, plane 1 not include in state
crtc_state.*async_flip: true -> false, but plane 1 still remains in
async flip mode
3. sync update/disable plane 1
crtc_state.*async_flip = true -> true, so the async flip disable w/a
Meant to write false->false there.
There is only one plane in game.
Apparently there is an issue with intel_crtc_crc_setup_workarounds.
It calls intel_atomic_get_crtc_state for fresh state, causing state
duplication, but async_flip flag is set always to false in new state.
In cases full modeset is not performed hw
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:36:05PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:14:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:57:37PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 06.09.2022 13:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > >> > > > >> On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > >> In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or > > > >> disabling > > > >> async update is always performed on vblank, > > > > It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. > > > > need_async_flip_disable_wa). > > > On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > > ... > > > On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing > > > run of > > > this test, last seen at: > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > > Similar for SKL: > > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > > > > > I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit > > > of > > > PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and > > > the > > > changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. > > > >>> It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > > > >>> > > > So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > > > > > > [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > > > >> but if async update is enabled > > > >> PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to > > > >> PLANE_SURF > > > >> when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > > > >> On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we > > > >> need to > > > >> write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value > > > >> should > > > >> be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > > > > I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > > > > flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > > > I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > > > figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. > > > >>> When it works as designed it should: > > > >>> 1. turn off the async flip bit > > > >>> 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched > > > >>> 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally > > > >> After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane > > > >> states > > > >> are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa > > > >> so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected > > > >> planes and w/a does not work at all. > > > >> I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. > > > >> Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is > > > >> just blind shot: > > > >> > > > >> @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device > > > >> *dev, > > > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > > >> > > > >> if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != > > > >> old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) > > > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > > >> + > > > >> + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); > > > >> + if (ret) > > > >> + goto fail; > > > >> } > > > >> > > > >> intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); > > > >> > > > >> ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); > > > >^ > > > > This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged > > > > for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to > > > > add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). > > > > > > This is no-modeset scenario, drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset does not > > > add planes in this case. > > > > Then he mystery is
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 05:14:56PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:57:37PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > > > > On 06.09.2022 13:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > >> > > >> On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > >> In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling > > >> async update is always performed on vblank, > > > It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). > > On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > ... > > On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run > > of > > this test, last seen at: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > Similar for SKL: > > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > > > I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of > > PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the > > changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. > > >>> It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > > >>> > > So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > > > > [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > > >> but if async update is enabled > > >> PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to > > >> PLANE_SURF > > >> when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > > >> On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we > > >> need to > > >> write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value > > >> should > > >> be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > > > I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > > > flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > > I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > > figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. > > >>> When it works as designed it should: > > >>> 1. turn off the async flip bit > > >>> 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched > > >>> 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally > > >> After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states > > >> are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa > > >> so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected > > >> planes and w/a does not work at all. > > >> I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. > > >> Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is > > >> just blind shot: > > >> > > >> @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device > > >> *dev, > > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > >> > > >> if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != > > >> old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) > > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > >> + > > >> + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); > > >> + if (ret) > > >> + goto fail; > > >> } > > >> > > >> intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); > > >> > > >> ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); > > >^ > > > This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged > > > for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to > > > add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). > > > > This is no-modeset scenario, drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset does not > > add planes in this case. > > Then he mystery is how intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa() manages > to not disable async flip for some planes... After a few minutes of pondering I have a theory: 1. async flip on plane 1 crtc_state.*async_flip: false -> true 2. sync flip on plane 2, plane 1 not include in state crtc_state.*async_flip: true
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 03:57:37PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > On 06.09.2022 13:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> > >> On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling > >> async update is always performed on vblank, > > It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). > On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > ... > On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of > this test, last seen at: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > Similar for SKL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of > PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the > changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. > >>> It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > >>> > So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > > [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > >> but if async update is enabled > >> PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF > >> when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > >> On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need > >> to > >> write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should > >> be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > > I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > > flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. > >>> When it works as designed it should: > >>> 1. turn off the async flip bit > >>> 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched > >>> 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally > >> After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states > >> are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa > >> so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected > >> planes and w/a does not work at all. > >> I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. > >> Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is > >> just blind shot: > >> > >> @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device > >> *dev, > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > >> > >> if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != > >> old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) > >> new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > >> + > >> + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); > >> + if (ret) > >> + goto fail; > >> } > >> > >> intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); > >> > >> ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); > >^ > > This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged > > for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to > > add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). > > This is no-modeset scenario, drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset does not > add planes in this case. Then he mystery is how intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa() manages to not disable async flip for some planes... -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On 06.09.2022 13:22, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling async update is always performed on vblank, It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html ... On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of this test, last seen at: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html Similar for SKL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 but if async update is enabled PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. When it works as designed it should: 1. turn off the async flip bit 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected planes and w/a does not work at all. I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is just blind shot: @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev, new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; + + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); + if (ret) + goto fail; } intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); ^ This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). This is no-modeset scenario, drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset does not add planes in this case. Btw, tested your warns from another mail, none appeared. Regards Andrzej For normal plane updates the relevant planes are already added when the property values are updated. Let me know if there is better place/way to handle it. Regards Andrzej
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 02:22:38PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > > > > On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > >> > > >> On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling > > async update is always performed on vblank, > > >>> It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). > > >> On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > >> ... > > >> On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of > > >> this test, last seen at: > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > >> Similar for SKL: > > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > >> > > >> I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of > > >> PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the > > >> changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. > > > It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > > > > > >> So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > > >> > > >> [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > > but if async update is enabled > > PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF > > when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > > On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need > > to > > write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should > > be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > > >>> I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > > >>> flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > > >> I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > > >> figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. > > > When it works as designed it should: > > > 1. turn off the async flip bit > > > 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched > > > 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally > > > > After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states > > are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa > > so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected > > planes and w/a does not work at all. > > I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. > > Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is > > just blind shot: > > > > @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device > > *dev, > > new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > > > if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != > > old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) > > new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > + > > + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); > > + if (ret) > > + goto fail; > > } > > > > intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); > > > > ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); > ^ > This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged > for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to > add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). > > For normal plane updates the relevant planes are already added > when the property values are updated. Hmm. Not having in the state doesn't really make sense because then we wouldn't have called the disable hook for the plane anyway. I guess one theory would be that update_mask is somehow stale. I did see one weird assert_plane() failure on one of my machines recently so that could also be pointing to the same thing. But I've not had time to investigate that one yet. I did type up a preliminary patch to see if we might catch something funny, but haven't tried feeding it to ci yet: diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_atomic_plane.c index dd876dbbaa39..f8ca3854357c
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Tue, Sep 06, 2022 at 01:09:16PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> > >> On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling > async update is always performed on vblank, > >>> It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). > >> On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > >> ... > >> On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of > >> this test, last seen at: > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > >> Similar for SKL: > >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > >> > >> I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of > >> PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the > >> changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. > > It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > > > >> So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > >> > >> [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > but if async update is enabled > PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF > when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to > write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should > be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > >>> I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > >>> flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > >> I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > >> figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. > > When it works as designed it should: > > 1. turn off the async flip bit > > 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched > > 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally > > After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states > are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa > so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected > planes and w/a does not work at all. > I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. > Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is > just blind shot: > > @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device > *dev, > new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > > if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != > old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) > new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; > + > + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); > + if (ret) > + goto fail; > } > > intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); > > ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); ^ This guy should be adding them for any crtc that has been flagged for modeset ahead of time. For modesets flagged later we have to add them by hand (eg. in intel_modeset_all_pipes()). For normal plane updates the relevant planes are already added when the property values are updated. > > > Let me know if there is better place/way to handle it. > > Regards > Andrzej -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On 05.09.2022 19:44, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling async update is always performed on vblank, It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html ... On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of this test, last seen at: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html Similar for SKL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 but if async update is enabled PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. When it works as designed it should: 1. turn off the async flip bit 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally After debugging this terra incognita, I've figured out that plane states are not populated in intel_crtc_async_flip_disable_wa so for_each_old_intel_plane_in_state does not iterate over affected planes and w/a does not work at all. I have no idea where affected plane states should be added. Adding them to the beginning of intel_atomic_check helped, but this is just blind shot: @@ -6778,10 +6778,14 @@ static int intel_atomic_check(struct drm_device *dev, new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; if (new_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter != old_crtc_state->uapi.scaling_filter) new_crtc_state->uapi.mode_changed = true; + + ret = intel_atomic_add_affected_planes(state, crtc); + if (ret) + goto fail; } intel_vrr_check_modeset(state); ret = drm_atomic_helper_check_modeset(dev, >base); Let me know if there is better place/way to handle it. Regards Andrzej
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 07:02:40PM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > > > On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > >> In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling > >> async update is always performed on vblank, > > It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). > > On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > ... > On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of > this test, last seen at: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > Similar for SKL: > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html > > I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of > PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the > changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. It got broken in bdw and fixed again in icl. > So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. > > [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 > > > >> but if async update is enabled > >> PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF > >> when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > >> On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to > >> write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should > >> be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. > > I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async > > flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > > I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in > figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. When it works as designed it should: 1. turn off the async flip bit 2. wait for vblank so that gets latched 3. do the sync plane update/disable normally -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On 05.09.2022 13:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote: On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling async update is always performed on vblank, It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). On CFL it is reported every drmtip run: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip.html?testfilter=tiled-max-hw https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@yf-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html#dmesg-warnings402 https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1209/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1208/fi-cfl-8109u/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html ... On APL it is less frequent, probably due to other bugs preventing run of this test, last seen at: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1190/fi-apl-guc/igt@kms_big...@y-tiled-max-hw-stride-32bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html Similar for SKL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/drmtip_1181/fi-skl-guc/igt@kms_big...@x-tiled-max-hw-stride-64bpp-rotate-180-async-flip.html I am not sure if I correctly read the docs but [1] says that 9th bit of PLANE_CFG (Async Address Update Enable) is "not double buffered and the changes will apply immediately" only for ICL, JSL, LKF1. So the change is not necessary in case of icl_plane_disable_arm. [1]: https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/7656 but if async update is enabled PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. I was not aware of existence of this w/a and I am little lost in figuring out how this w/a can prevent zeroing PLANE_SURF too early. Regards Andrzej Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c index bcfde81e4d0866..bc9ed60a2d349e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c @@ -615,11 +615,13 @@ skl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev); enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id; enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe; + u32 plane_surf; skl_write_plane_wm(plane, crtc_state); intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), 0); + plane_surf = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)); + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf); } static void @@ -629,6 +631,7 @@ icl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev); enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id; enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe; + u32 plane_surf; if (icl_is_hdr_plane(dev_priv, plane_id)) intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CUS_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); @@ -637,7 +640,8 @@ icl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, intel_psr2_disable_plane_sel_fetch(plane, crtc_state); intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), 0); + plane_surf = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)); + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf); } static bool -- 2.25.1
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 10:05:00AM +0200, Andrzej Hajda wrote: > In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling > async update is always performed on vblank, It should only be broken on bdw-glk (see. need_async_flip_disable_wa). > but if async update is enabled > PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF > when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. > On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to > write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should > be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. I think you're effectively saying that somehow the async flip disable w/a is not kicking in sometimes. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 8 ++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c > index bcfde81e4d0866..bc9ed60a2d349e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c > @@ -615,11 +615,13 @@ skl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev); > enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id; > enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe; > + u32 plane_surf; > > skl_write_plane_wm(plane, crtc_state); > > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); > - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), 0); > + plane_surf = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)); > + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf); > } > > static void > @@ -629,6 +631,7 @@ icl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, > struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev); > enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id; > enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe; > + u32 plane_surf; > > if (icl_is_hdr_plane(dev_priv, plane_id)) > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CUS_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); > @@ -637,7 +640,8 @@ icl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, > > intel_psr2_disable_plane_sel_fetch(plane, crtc_state); > intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); > - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), 0); > + plane_surf = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)); > + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf); > } > > static bool > -- > 2.25.1 -- Ville Syrjälä Intel
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: do not reset PLANE_SURF on plane disable on older gens
In case of ICL and older generations disabling plane and/or disabling async update is always performed on vblank, but if async update is enabled PLANE_SURF register is updated asynchronously. Writing 0 to PLANE_SURF when plane is still enabled can cause DMAR/PIPE errors. On the other side PLANE_SURF is used to arm plane registers - we need to write to it to trigger update on VBLANK, writting current value should be safe - the buffer address is valid till vblank. Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c index bcfde81e4d0866..bc9ed60a2d349e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/skl_universal_plane.c @@ -615,11 +615,13 @@ skl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev); enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id; enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe; + u32 plane_surf; skl_write_plane_wm(plane, crtc_state); intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), 0); + plane_surf = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)); + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf); } static void @@ -629,6 +631,7 @@ icl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(plane->base.dev); enum plane_id plane_id = plane->id; enum pipe pipe = plane->pipe; + u32 plane_surf; if (icl_is_hdr_plane(dev_priv, plane_id)) intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CUS_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); @@ -637,7 +640,8 @@ icl_plane_disable_arm(struct intel_plane *plane, intel_psr2_disable_plane_sel_fetch(plane, crtc_state); intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_CTL(pipe, plane_id), 0); - intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), 0); + plane_surf = intel_de_read_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id)); + intel_de_write_fw(dev_priv, PLANE_SURF(pipe, plane_id), plane_surf); } static bool -- 2.25.1
