On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 08:58:03PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Somehow we've lost the error handling in the patch split-up between
the internal and external patch. This regression has been introduced
in
commit 5032d871f7d300aee10c309ea004eb4f851553fe
Author: Rafael Barbalho rafael.barba...@intel.com
Date: Wed Aug 21 17:10:51 2013 +0100
drm/i915: Cleaning up the relocate entry function
This bug is exercised by igt/gem_reloc_vs_gpu/interruptible.
I've smashed the patch onto dinq meanwhile.
-Daniel
Cc: Rafael Barbalho rafael.barba...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index ea4bacb..e519f9f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -349,6 +349,9 @@ i915_gem_execbuffer_relocate_entry(struct
drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
else
ret = relocate_entry_gtt(obj, reloc);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
/* and update the user's relocation entry */
reloc-presumed_offset = target_offset;
--
1.8.4.rc3
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
