[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm-intel-collector - update

2014-08-18 Thread Rodrigo Vivi

This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector

Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:

Patch drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6. - Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915: Don't save/restore RS when not used - Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915: honour forced connector modes - Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915/bdw: Map unused PDPs to a scratch page - Reviewer:


Ben Widawsky (1):
  drm/i915: Don't save/restore RS when not used

Bob Beckett (1):
  drm/i915/bdw: Map unused PDPs to a scratch page

Chris Wilson (1):
  drm/i915: honour forced connector modes

Deepak S (1):
  drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c | 10 +++--
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 79 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h |  2 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fbdev.c  | 33 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c |  6 +++
 5 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/4] drm-intel-collector - update

2014-03-13 Thread Rodrigo Vivi

This is another drm-intel-collector updated notice:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector

Here goes the update list in order for better reviewers assignment:

Patch drm/i915: Verify address field of PCBR register. - Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6. - Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915: Per-process stats work better when evaluated per-process - 
Reviewer:
Patch drm/i915: dma_buf_vunmap is presumed not to fail, don't let it - 
Reviewer:

Overall Process:

drm-intel-collector - review request
 1. Daniel pushs drm-intel-testing (every 2 weeks)
 2. I rebase drm-intel-collector onto drm-intel-testing
 3. Add Reviewer: tag with voluntered reviewers. If you don't believe you 
should be assigned on a particular patch please don't get mad just tell you 
wont review or volunteer someone else.
 4. I resubmit remaining patches for review without picking any new 
(drm-intel-collector - review request)

drm-intel-collector - updated
 5. One week later I collect all simple (1-2) patches that wasn't yet reviewed 
and not queued by Daniel from one testing update until another.
 6. Request automated QA's PRTS automated i-g-t tests comparing 
drm-intel-testing x drm-intel-collector
 7. If tests are ok I send the update notification or the patches as a series 
to intel-gfx mailing list for better tracking and to be reviewed. 
(drm-intel-collector - updated)
 8. Let me know volunteers for review new patches and also let me know if I've 
picked any patch that I shouldn't.

There are some reasons that some patches can be left behind:
1. Your patch didn't applied cleanly and I couldn't easily solve the conflicts.
2. Kernel didn't compiled with your patch.
3. I simply missed it. If you believe this is the case please warn me.

Please help me to get these patches reviewed and queued by Daniel.

Also, please let me know if you have further ideas how to improve this process.

Thanks in advance,
Rodrigo.


Chris Wilson (2):
  drm/i915: Per-process stats work better when evaluated per-process
  drm/i915: dma_buf_vunmap is presumed not to fail, don't let it

Deepak S (2):
  drm/i915: Verify address field of PCBR register.
  drm/i915: Bring UP Power Wells before disabling RC6.

 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 34 ++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h |  2 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_context.c |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_dmabuf.c  |  6 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h |  1 +
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 15 +--
 6 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.5.3

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx