Conditional spinlocks make it hard for gcc and for lockdep to
follow the code flow. This one causes a warning with at least
gcc-9 and higher:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:14,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c:7:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c: In function 'i915_sample':
include/linux/spinlock.h:289:3: error: 'flags' may be used uninitialized in
this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
289 | _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags); \
| ^~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c:288:17: note: 'flags' was declared here
288 | unsigned long flags;
| ^
Split out the part between the locks into a separate function
for readability and to let the compiler figure out what the
logic actually is.
Fixes: d79e1bd676f0 ("drm/i915/pmu: Only use exclusive mmio access for gen7")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
I have no idea why I see three separate issues like this pop up in i915,
there are not a lot of them elsewhere.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c | 84 -
1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
index e991a707bdb7..962ded9ce73f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pmu.c
@@ -269,12 +269,48 @@ static bool exclusive_mmio_access(const struct
drm_i915_private *i915)
return IS_GEN(i915, 7);
}
+static void engine_sample(struct intel_engine_cs *engine, unsigned int
period_ns)
+{
+ struct intel_engine_pmu *pmu = &engine->pmu;
+ bool busy;
+ u32 val;
+
+ val = ENGINE_READ_FW(engine, RING_CTL);
+ if (val == 0) /* powerwell off => engine idle */
+ return;
+
+ if (val & RING_WAIT)
+ add_sample(&pmu->sample[I915_SAMPLE_WAIT], period_ns);
+ if (val & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE)
+ add_sample(&pmu->sample[I915_SAMPLE_SEMA], period_ns);
+
+ /* No need to sample when busy stats are supported. */
+ if (intel_engine_supports_stats(engine))
+ return;
+
+ /*
+* While waiting on a semaphore or event, MI_MODE reports the
+* ring as idle. However, previously using the seqno, and with
+* execlists sampling, we account for the ring waiting as the
+* engine being busy. Therefore, we record the sample as being
+* busy if either waiting or !idle.
+*/
+ busy = val & (RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE | RING_WAIT);
+ if (!busy) {
+ val = ENGINE_READ_FW(engine, RING_MI_MODE);
+ busy = !(val & MODE_IDLE);
+ }
+ if (busy)
+ add_sample(&pmu->sample[I915_SAMPLE_BUSY], period_ns);
+}
+
static void
engines_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int period_ns)
{
struct drm_i915_private *i915 = gt->i915;
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
enum intel_engine_id id;
+ unsigned long flags;
if ((i915->pmu.enable & ENGINE_SAMPLE_MASK) == 0)
return;
@@ -283,53 +319,17 @@ engines_sample(struct intel_gt *gt, unsigned int
period_ns)
return;
for_each_engine(engine, gt, id) {
- struct intel_engine_pmu *pmu = &engine->pmu;
- spinlock_t *mmio_lock;
- unsigned long flags;
- bool busy;
- u32 val;
-
if (!intel_engine_pm_get_if_awake(engine))
continue;
- mmio_lock = NULL;
- if (exclusive_mmio_access(i915))
- mmio_lock = &engine->uncore->lock;
-
- if (unlikely(mmio_lock))
- spin_lock_irqsave(mmio_lock, flags);
-
- val = ENGINE_READ_FW(engine, RING_CTL);
- if (val == 0) /* powerwell off => engine idle */
- goto skip;
-
- if (val & RING_WAIT)
- add_sample(&pmu->sample[I915_SAMPLE_WAIT], period_ns);
- if (val & RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE)
- add_sample(&pmu->sample[I915_SAMPLE_SEMA], period_ns);
-
- /* No need to sample when busy stats are supported. */
- if (intel_engine_supports_stats(engine))
- goto skip;
-
- /*
-* While waiting on a semaphore or event, MI_MODE reports the
-* ring as idle. However, previously using the seqno, and with
-* execlists sampling, we account for the ring waiting as the
-* engine being busy. Therefore, we record the sample as being
-* busy if either waiting or !idle.
-*/
- busy = val & (RING_WAIT_SEMAPHORE | RING_WAIT);
- if (!busy) {
- val = ENGINE_READ_FW(engine, RING_MI_MODE);
- busy = !(val & MODE_IDLE);
+ if (exclusive_mmio_access(i915)) {
+
