Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/6] lib/igt_device_scan: Improve Intel discrete GPU selection

2023-01-29 Thread Zbigniew Kempczyński
On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 11:12:41AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin 
> 
> Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
> but they are not Intel GPUs, we need a better selection logic than looking
> at the vendor. Use the driver name instead.
> 
> Caveat that the driver key was on a blacklist so far, and although I can't
> imagine it can be slow to probe, this is something to double check.

I don't remember why driver was added to the list. But you're right, driver
instead of vendor gives clear situation what drm device we're working on.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin 
> Cc: Kamil Konieczny 
> Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński 
> ---
>  lib/igt_device_scan.c | 7 +--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_device_scan.c b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> index ed128d24dd10..8b767eed202d 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ struct igt_device {
>   char *vendor;
>   char *device;
>   char *pci_slot_name;
> + char *driver;
>   int gpu_index; /* For more than one GPU with same vendor and device. */
>  
>   char *codename; /* For grouping by codename */
> @@ -440,7 +441,6 @@ static bool is_on_blacklist(const char *what)
> "resource3", "resource4", "resource5",
> "resource0_wc", "resource1_wc", 
> "resource2_wc",
> "resource3_wc", "resource4_wc", 
> "resource5_wc",
> -   "driver",
> "uevent", NULL};
>   const char *key;
>   int i = 0;
> @@ -662,6 +662,8 @@ static struct igt_device *igt_device_new_from_udev(struct 
> udev_device *dev)
>   get_pci_vendor_device(idev, , );
>   idev->codename = __pci_codename(vendor, device);
>   idev->dev_type = __pci_devtype(vendor, device, 
> idev->pci_slot_name);
> + idev->driver = strdup_nullsafe(get_attr(idev, "driver"));
> + igt_assert(idev->driver);
>   }
>  
>   return idev;
> @@ -776,7 +778,7 @@ static bool __find_first_i915_card(struct igt_device_card 
> *card, bool discrete)
>  
>   igt_list_for_each_entry(dev, _devs.all, link) {
>  
> - if (!is_pci_subsystem(dev) || !is_vendor_matched(dev, "intel"))
> + if (!is_pci_subsystem(dev) || strcmp(dev->driver, "i915"))

We can easily add finding xe card in the future similar to the above. From me:

Reviewed-by: Zbigniew Kempczyński 

--
Zbigniew

>   continue;
>  
>   cmp = strncmp(dev->pci_slot_name, INTEGRATED_I915_GPU_PCI_ID,
> @@ -1023,6 +1025,7 @@ static void igt_device_free(struct igt_device *dev)
>   free(dev->drm_render);
>   free(dev->vendor);
>   free(dev->device);
> + free(dev->driver);
>   free(dev->pci_slot_name);
>   g_hash_table_destroy(dev->attrs_ht);
>   g_hash_table_destroy(dev->props_ht);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/6] lib/igt_device_scan: Improve Intel discrete GPU selection

2023-01-27 Thread Kamil Konieczny
Hi Tvrtko,

On 2023-01-27 at 11:12:41 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin 
> 
> Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
> but they are not Intel GPUs, we need a better selection logic than looking
> at the vendor. Use the driver name instead.
> 
> Caveat that the driver key was on a blacklist so far, and although I can't
> imagine it can be slow to probe, this is something to double check.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin 
> Cc: Kamil Konieczny 
> Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński 

Please send this as separate patch, not in this series.

> ---
>  lib/igt_device_scan.c | 7 +--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/igt_device_scan.c b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> index ed128d24dd10..8b767eed202d 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
> @@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ struct igt_device {
>   char *vendor;
>   char *device;
>   char *pci_slot_name;
> + char *driver;
>   int gpu_index; /* For more than one GPU with same vendor and device. */
>  
>   char *codename; /* For grouping by codename */
> @@ -440,7 +441,6 @@ static bool is_on_blacklist(const char *what)
> "resource3", "resource4", "resource5",
> "resource0_wc", "resource1_wc", 
> "resource2_wc",
> "resource3_wc", "resource4_wc", 
> "resource5_wc",
> -   "driver",
> "uevent", NULL};
>   const char *key;
>   int i = 0;
> @@ -662,6 +662,8 @@ static struct igt_device *igt_device_new_from_udev(struct 
> udev_device *dev)
>   get_pci_vendor_device(idev, , );
>   idev->codename = __pci_codename(vendor, device);
>   idev->dev_type = __pci_devtype(vendor, device, 
> idev->pci_slot_name);
> + idev->driver = strdup_nullsafe(get_attr(idev, "driver"));
> + igt_assert(idev->driver);
>   }
>  
>   return idev;
> @@ -776,7 +778,7 @@ static bool __find_first_i915_card(struct igt_device_card 
> *card, bool discrete)
>  
>   igt_list_for_each_entry(dev, _devs.all, link) {
>  
> - if (!is_pci_subsystem(dev) || !is_vendor_matched(dev, "intel"))
> + if (!is_pci_subsystem(dev) || strcmp(dev->driver, "i915"))

Put the comment here why it can be problematic to relay on driver name.

Regards,
Kamil

>   continue;
>  
>   cmp = strncmp(dev->pci_slot_name, INTEGRATED_I915_GPU_PCI_ID,
> @@ -1023,6 +1025,7 @@ static void igt_device_free(struct igt_device *dev)
>   free(dev->drm_render);
>   free(dev->vendor);
>   free(dev->device);
> + free(dev->driver);
>   free(dev->pci_slot_name);
>   g_hash_table_destroy(dev->attrs_ht);
>   g_hash_table_destroy(dev->props_ht);
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 6/6] lib/igt_device_scan: Improve Intel discrete GPU selection

2023-01-27 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin 

Now that DRM subsystem can contain PCI cards with the vendor set to Intel
but they are not Intel GPUs, we need a better selection logic than looking
at the vendor. Use the driver name instead.

Caveat that the driver key was on a blacklist so far, and although I can't
imagine it can be slow to probe, this is something to double check.

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin 
Cc: Kamil Konieczny 
Cc: Zbigniew Kempczyński 
---
 lib/igt_device_scan.c | 7 +--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/igt_device_scan.c b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
index ed128d24dd10..8b767eed202d 100644
--- a/lib/igt_device_scan.c
+++ b/lib/igt_device_scan.c
@@ -237,6 +237,7 @@ struct igt_device {
char *vendor;
char *device;
char *pci_slot_name;
+   char *driver;
int gpu_index; /* For more than one GPU with same vendor and device. */
 
char *codename; /* For grouping by codename */
@@ -440,7 +441,6 @@ static bool is_on_blacklist(const char *what)
  "resource3", "resource4", "resource5",
  "resource0_wc", "resource1_wc", 
"resource2_wc",
  "resource3_wc", "resource4_wc", 
"resource5_wc",
- "driver",
  "uevent", NULL};
const char *key;
int i = 0;
@@ -662,6 +662,8 @@ static struct igt_device *igt_device_new_from_udev(struct 
udev_device *dev)
get_pci_vendor_device(idev, , );
idev->codename = __pci_codename(vendor, device);
idev->dev_type = __pci_devtype(vendor, device, 
idev->pci_slot_name);
+   idev->driver = strdup_nullsafe(get_attr(idev, "driver"));
+   igt_assert(idev->driver);
}
 
return idev;
@@ -776,7 +778,7 @@ static bool __find_first_i915_card(struct igt_device_card 
*card, bool discrete)
 
igt_list_for_each_entry(dev, _devs.all, link) {
 
-   if (!is_pci_subsystem(dev) || !is_vendor_matched(dev, "intel"))
+   if (!is_pci_subsystem(dev) || strcmp(dev->driver, "i915"))
continue;
 
cmp = strncmp(dev->pci_slot_name, INTEGRATED_I915_GPU_PCI_ID,
@@ -1023,6 +1025,7 @@ static void igt_device_free(struct igt_device *dev)
free(dev->drm_render);
free(dev->vendor);
free(dev->device);
+   free(dev->driver);
free(dev->pci_slot_name);
g_hash_table_destroy(dev->attrs_ht);
g_hash_table_destroy(dev->props_ht);
-- 
2.34.1