[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_eio: Increase wakeup delay for in-flight-suspend

[Chris Wilson]

For in-flight-suspend, we need to wait for the GPU hang within
i915_gem_suspend(). This will take 10-20s, which means that the standard
wakeup delay of around 15s may occur before we complete the suspend.
This causes a pm_system_wakeup(), causing dpm_suspend() to return
-EBUSY.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala 
---
 tests/gem_eio.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
index 7a6be393..2ac9f0a9 100644
--- a/tests/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
@@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ static void test_inflight_suspend(int fd)
igt_assert(fence[n] != -1);
}
 
-   igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM,
- SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+   igt_set_autoresume_delay(30);
+   igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
 
igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
 
-- 
2.15.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_eio: Increase wakeup delay for in-flight-suspend

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson  writes:

> For in-flight-suspend, we need to wait for the GPU hang within
> i915_gem_suspend(). This will take 10-20s, which means that the standard
> wakeup delay of around 15s may occur before we complete the suspend.
> This causes a pm_system_wakeup(), causing dpm_suspend() to return
> -EBUSY.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala 

> ---
>  tests/gem_eio.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
> index 7a6be393..2ac9f0a9 100644
> --- a/tests/gem_eio.c
> +++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
> @@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ static void test_inflight_suspend(int fd)
>   igt_assert(fence[n] != -1);
>   }
>  
> - igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM,
> -   SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
> + igt_set_autoresume_delay(30);
> + igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>  
>   igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);

post_hang_cleanup(?) ...

-Mika

>  
> -- 
> 2.15.1
>
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH igt] igt/gem_eio: Increase wakeup delay for in-flight-suspend

[Chris Wilson]

For in-flight-suspend, we need to wait for the GPU hang within
i915_gem_suspend(). This will take 10-20s, which means that the standard
wakeup delay of around 15s may occur before we complete the suspend.
This causes a pm_system_wakeup(), causing dpm_suspend() to return
-EBUSY.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson 
---
 tests/gem_eio.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/gem_eio.c b/tests/gem_eio.c
index 7a6be393..2ac9f0a9 100644
--- a/tests/gem_eio.c
+++ b/tests/gem_eio.c
@@ -258,8 +258,8 @@ static void test_inflight_suspend(int fd)
igt_assert(fence[n] != -1);
}
 
-   igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM,
- SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
+   igt_set_autoresume_delay(30);
+   igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_MEM, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
 
igt_post_hang_ring(fd, hang);
 
-- 
2.15.1

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx