Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Distribute switch variables for initialization

2020-02-23 Thread Jani Nikula 
On Fri, 21 Feb 2020, Ville Syrjälä  wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:05:17PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Variables declared in a switch statement before any case statements
>> cannot be automatically initialized with compiler instrumentation (as
>> they are not part of any execution flow). With GCC's proposed automatic
>> stack variable initialization feature, this triggers a warning (and they
>> don't get initialized). Clang's automatic stack variable initialization
>> (via CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL=y) doesn't throw a warning, but it also
>> doesn't initialize such variables[1]. Note that these warnings (or silent
>> skipping) happen before the dead-store elimination optimization phase,
>> so even when the automatic initializations are later elided in favor of
>> direct initializations, the warnings remain.
>> 
>> To avoid these problems, move such variables into the "case" where
>> they're used or lift them up into the main function body.
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c: In function 
>> ‘check_digital_port_conflicts’:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:12963:17: warning: statement 
>> will never be executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
>> 12963 |unsigned int port_mask;
>>   | ^
>> 
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘vlv_get_fifo_size’:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:474:7: warning: statement will never be 
>> executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
>>   474 |   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>>   |   ^~
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘vlv_atomic_update_fifo’:
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:1997:7: warning: statement will never be 
>> executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
>>  1997 |   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>>   |   ^~
>> 
>> [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44916
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
>> ---
>> v2: remove port_mask entirely (Ville Syrjälä)
>> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200220062258.68854-1-keesc...@chromium.org
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 ++-
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 4 ++--
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> index 064dd99bbc49..5f8c61932e82 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
>> @@ -12960,7 +12960,6 @@ static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct 
>> intel_atomic_state *state)
>>  WARN_ON(!connector_state->crtc);
>>  
>>  switch (encoder->type) {
>> -unsigned int port_mask;
>>  case INTEL_OUTPUT_DDI:
>>  if (WARN_ON(!HAS_DDI(to_i915(dev
>>  break;
>> @@ -12968,13 +12967,11 @@ static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct 
>> intel_atomic_state *state)
>>  case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP:
>>  case INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI:
>>  case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
>> -port_mask = 1 << encoder->port;
>> -
>>  /* the same port mustn't appear more than once */
>> -if (used_ports & port_mask)
>> +if (used_ports & BIT(encoder->port))
>>  ret = false;
>>  
>> -used_ports |= port_mask;
>> +used_ports |= BIT(encoder->port);
>
> Thanks. Looks good.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä 

Thanks for the patch and review, pushed to dinq.

BR,
Jani.

>
>>  break;
>>  case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST:
>>  used_mst_ports |=
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> index bd2d30ecc030..17d8833787c4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
>> @@ -469,9 +469,9 @@ static void vlv_get_fifo_size(struct intel_crtc_state 
>> *crtc_state)
>>  struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state = _state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
>>  enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>>  int sprite0_start, sprite1_start;
>> +u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>>  
>>  switch (pipe) {
>> -u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>>  case PIPE_A:
>>  dsparb = I915_READ(DSPARB);
>>  dsparb2 = I915_READ(DSPARB2);
>> @@ -1969,6 +1969,7 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct 
>> intel_atomic_state *state,
>>  const struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state =
>>  _state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
>>  int sprite0_start, sprite1_start, fifo_size;
>> +u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>>  
>>  if (!crtc_state->fifo_changed)
>>  return;
>> @@ -1994,7 +1995,6 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct 
>> intel_atomic_state *state,
>>  spin_lock(>lock);
>>  
>>  switch (crtc->pipe) {
>> -u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>>  case PIPE_A:
>>  dsparb = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Distribute switch variables for initialization

2020-02-21 Thread Ville Syrjälä 
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 04:05:17PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> Variables declared in a switch statement before any case statements
> cannot be automatically initialized with compiler instrumentation (as
> they are not part of any execution flow). With GCC's proposed automatic
> stack variable initialization feature, this triggers a warning (and they
> don't get initialized). Clang's automatic stack variable initialization
> (via CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL=y) doesn't throw a warning, but it also
> doesn't initialize such variables[1]. Note that these warnings (or silent
> skipping) happen before the dead-store elimination optimization phase,
> so even when the automatic initializations are later elided in favor of
> direct initializations, the warnings remain.
> 
> To avoid these problems, move such variables into the "case" where
> they're used or lift them up into the main function body.
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c: In function 
> ‘check_digital_port_conflicts’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:12963:17: warning: statement 
> will never be executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
> 12963 |unsigned int port_mask;
>   | ^
> 
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘vlv_get_fifo_size’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:474:7: warning: statement will never be 
> executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
>   474 |   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>   |   ^~
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘vlv_atomic_update_fifo’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:1997:7: warning: statement will never be 
> executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
>  1997 |   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>   |   ^~
> 
> [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44916
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
> ---
> v2: remove port_mask entirely (Ville Syrjälä)
> v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200220062258.68854-1-keesc...@chromium.org
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 ++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> index 064dd99bbc49..5f8c61932e82 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
> @@ -12960,7 +12960,6 @@ static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>   WARN_ON(!connector_state->crtc);
>  
>   switch (encoder->type) {
> - unsigned int port_mask;
>   case INTEL_OUTPUT_DDI:
>   if (WARN_ON(!HAS_DDI(to_i915(dev
>   break;
> @@ -12968,13 +12967,11 @@ static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state)
>   case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP:
>   case INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI:
>   case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
> - port_mask = 1 << encoder->port;
> -
>   /* the same port mustn't appear more than once */
> - if (used_ports & port_mask)
> + if (used_ports & BIT(encoder->port))
>   ret = false;
>  
> - used_ports |= port_mask;
> + used_ports |= BIT(encoder->port);

Thanks. Looks good.

Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä 

>   break;
>   case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST:
>   used_mst_ports |=
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index bd2d30ecc030..17d8833787c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -469,9 +469,9 @@ static void vlv_get_fifo_size(struct intel_crtc_state 
> *crtc_state)
>   struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state = _state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
>   enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
>   int sprite0_start, sprite1_start;
> + u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>  
>   switch (pipe) {
> - u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>   case PIPE_A:
>   dsparb = I915_READ(DSPARB);
>   dsparb2 = I915_READ(DSPARB2);
> @@ -1969,6 +1969,7 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>   const struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state =
>   _state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
>   int sprite0_start, sprite1_start, fifo_size;
> + u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>  
>   if (!crtc_state->fifo_changed)
>   return;
> @@ -1994,7 +1995,6 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct 
> intel_atomic_state *state,
>   spin_lock(>lock);
>  
>   switch (crtc->pipe) {
> - u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
>   case PIPE_A:
>   dsparb = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB);
>   dsparb2 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB2);
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kees Cook
> ___
> Intel-gfx mailing list
>

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Distribute switch variables for initialization

2020-02-20 Thread Kees Cook 
Variables declared in a switch statement before any case statements
cannot be automatically initialized with compiler instrumentation (as
they are not part of any execution flow). With GCC's proposed automatic
stack variable initialization feature, this triggers a warning (and they
don't get initialized). Clang's automatic stack variable initialization
(via CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL=y) doesn't throw a warning, but it also
doesn't initialize such variables[1]. Note that these warnings (or silent
skipping) happen before the dead-store elimination optimization phase,
so even when the automatic initializations are later elided in favor of
direct initializations, the warnings remain.

To avoid these problems, move such variables into the "case" where
they're used or lift them up into the main function body.

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c: In function 
‘check_digital_port_conflicts’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:12963:17: warning: statement will 
never be executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
12963 |unsigned int port_mask;
  | ^

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘vlv_get_fifo_size’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:474:7: warning: statement will never be 
executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
  474 |   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
  |   ^~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c: In function ‘vlv_atomic_update_fifo’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c:1997:7: warning: statement will never be 
executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
 1997 |   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
  |   ^~

[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44916

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook 
---
v2: remove port_mask entirely (Ville Syrjälä)
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200220062258.68854-1-keesc...@chromium.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 7 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  | 4 ++--
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c 
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 064dd99bbc49..5f8c61932e82 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -12960,7 +12960,6 @@ static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state)
WARN_ON(!connector_state->crtc);
 
switch (encoder->type) {
-   unsigned int port_mask;
case INTEL_OUTPUT_DDI:
if (WARN_ON(!HAS_DDI(to_i915(dev
break;
@@ -12968,13 +12967,11 @@ static bool check_digital_port_conflicts(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state)
case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP:
case INTEL_OUTPUT_HDMI:
case INTEL_OUTPUT_EDP:
-   port_mask = 1 << encoder->port;
-
/* the same port mustn't appear more than once */
-   if (used_ports & port_mask)
+   if (used_ports & BIT(encoder->port))
ret = false;
 
-   used_ports |= port_mask;
+   used_ports |= BIT(encoder->port);
break;
case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST:
used_mst_ports |=
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index bd2d30ecc030..17d8833787c4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -469,9 +469,9 @@ static void vlv_get_fifo_size(struct intel_crtc_state 
*crtc_state)
struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state = _state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
enum pipe pipe = crtc->pipe;
int sprite0_start, sprite1_start;
+   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
 
switch (pipe) {
-   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
case PIPE_A:
dsparb = I915_READ(DSPARB);
dsparb2 = I915_READ(DSPARB2);
@@ -1969,6 +1969,7 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state,
const struct vlv_fifo_state *fifo_state =
_state->wm.vlv.fifo_state;
int sprite0_start, sprite1_start, fifo_size;
+   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
 
if (!crtc_state->fifo_changed)
return;
@@ -1994,7 +1995,6 @@ static void vlv_atomic_update_fifo(struct 
intel_atomic_state *state,
spin_lock(>lock);
 
switch (crtc->pipe) {
-   u32 dsparb, dsparb2, dsparb3;
case PIPE_A:
dsparb = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB);
dsparb2 = intel_uncore_read_fw(uncore, DSPARB2);
-- 
2.20.1


-- 
Kees Cook
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx