Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values

2023-11-21 Thread Lyude Paul
For patches 1-3:

Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul 

On Thu, 2023-11-16 at 15:18 +0200, Imre Deak wrote:
> This is v2 of [1], with the following changes:
> - Store the pbn_div value in fixed point format.
> - Fix PBN calculation in patch 8.
> - Reuse intel_dp_max_data_rate(), intel_dp_effective_data_rate() in
>   intel_link_compute_m_n() (Jani).
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231113201110.510724-1-imre.d...@intel.com
> 
> Cc: Arun R Murthy 
> Cc: Jani Nikula 
> Cc: Lyude Paul 
> 
> Imre Deak (11):
>   drm/dp_mst: Store the MST PBN divider value in fixed point format
>   drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates
>   drm/dp_mst: Add kunit tests for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw()
>   drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with
> drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()
>   drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding efficiency on UHBR links
>   drm/i915/dp: Fix UHBR link M/N values
>   drm/i915/dp_mst: Calculate the BW overhead in
> intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp()
>   drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN / MTP_TU size calculation for UHBR rates
>   drm/i915/dp: Report a rounded-down value as the maximum data rate
>   drm/i915/dp: Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate()
>   drm/i915/dp: Reuse intel_dp_{max,effective}_data_rate in
> intel_link_compute_m_n()
> 
>  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |   5 +-
>  .../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c |   3 +-
>  .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c   |   5 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |  31 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  51 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   |  78 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h   |   5 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  55 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c   |   6 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_dp_mst_helper_test.c| 145 ++
>  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h   |  13 ++
>  include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h   |   7 +-
>  12 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 

-- 
Cheers,
 Lyude Paul (she/her)
 Software Engineer at Red Hat



Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values

2023-11-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023, Imre Deak  wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:31:34PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Imre Deak  wrote:
>> > This is v2 of [1], with the following changes:
>> > - Store the pbn_div value in fixed point format.
>> > - Fix PBN calculation in patch 8.
>> > - Reuse intel_dp_max_data_rate(), intel_dp_effective_data_rate() in
>> >   intel_link_compute_m_n() (Jani).
>> >
>> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231113201110.510724-1-imre.d...@intel.com
>> >
>> > Cc: Arun R Murthy 
>> > Cc: Jani Nikula 
>> > Cc: Lyude Paul 
>> >
>> > Imre Deak (11):
>> >   drm/dp_mst: Store the MST PBN divider value in fixed point format
>> >   drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates
>> >   drm/dp_mst: Add kunit tests for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw()
>> 
>> Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these three via drm-intel-next?
>> 
>> Imre, I note that said patches were Cc: dri-devel, but for future
>> reference please Cc: the entire series to dri-devel when you include
>> dependencies that you plan to merge via drm-intel.
>
> Ok. I assumed the alternative to merge the 3 patches via drm-misc-next,
> wait for that to get merged back to i915 and then merge the rest to i915
> was still a preferred way; wondering now if in general this is better to
> avoid merge conflicts similar to the one reported now wrt. 
>   "drm/dp_mst: Fix fractional DSC bpp handling".
>
> In any case yes, I can CC dri-devel the whole patchset whenever there
> are any drm changes in it. While still wondering about the ideal
> approach above, I'd still prefer if the 3 drm patches in this one could
> also get merged via the i915 tree.

There are no rigid rules for this.

But it's clearly more problematic when the patches touch not just drm +
one driver, but drm + several drivers. Perhaps that's an indication they
should be merged via drm-misc-next instead of a driver tree.

Also, we probably need to clear up the existing conflicts before adding
more patches in the area to drm-intel-next.

BR,
Jani.


>
> --Imre
>
>> BR,
>> Jani.
>> 
>> 
>> >   drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with
>> > drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()
>> >   drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding efficiency on UHBR links
>> >   drm/i915/dp: Fix UHBR link M/N values
>> >   drm/i915/dp_mst: Calculate the BW overhead in
>> > intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp()
>> >   drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN / MTP_TU size calculation for UHBR rates
>> >   drm/i915/dp: Report a rounded-down value as the maximum data rate
>> >   drm/i915/dp: Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate()
>> >   drm/i915/dp: Reuse intel_dp_{max,effective}_data_rate in
>> > intel_link_compute_m_n()
>> >
>> >  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |   5 +-
>> >  .../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c |   3 +-
>> >  .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c   |   5 +-
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |  31 +++-
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  51 ++
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   |  78 +++---
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h   |   5 +-
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  55 +--
>> >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c   |   6 +-
>> >  .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_dp_mst_helper_test.c| 145 ++
>> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h   |  13 ++
>> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h   |   7 +-
>> >  12 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jani Nikula, Intel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values

2023-11-20 Thread Imre Deak
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 02:31:34PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Imre Deak  wrote:
> > This is v2 of [1], with the following changes:
> > - Store the pbn_div value in fixed point format.
> > - Fix PBN calculation in patch 8.
> > - Reuse intel_dp_max_data_rate(), intel_dp_effective_data_rate() in
> >   intel_link_compute_m_n() (Jani).
> >
> > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231113201110.510724-1-imre.d...@intel.com
> >
> > Cc: Arun R Murthy 
> > Cc: Jani Nikula 
> > Cc: Lyude Paul 
> >
> > Imre Deak (11):
> >   drm/dp_mst: Store the MST PBN divider value in fixed point format
> >   drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates
> >   drm/dp_mst: Add kunit tests for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw()
> 
> Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these three via drm-intel-next?
> 
> Imre, I note that said patches were Cc: dri-devel, but for future
> reference please Cc: the entire series to dri-devel when you include
> dependencies that you plan to merge via drm-intel.

Ok. I assumed the alternative to merge the 3 patches via drm-misc-next,
wait for that to get merged back to i915 and then merge the rest to i915
was still a preferred way; wondering now if in general this is better to
avoid merge conflicts similar to the one reported now wrt. 
  "drm/dp_mst: Fix fractional DSC bpp handling".

In any case yes, I can CC dri-devel the whole patchset whenever there
are any drm changes in it. While still wondering about the ideal
approach above, I'd still prefer if the 3 drm patches in this one could
also get merged via the i915 tree.

--Imre

> BR,
> Jani.
> 
> 
> >   drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with
> > drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()
> >   drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding efficiency on UHBR links
> >   drm/i915/dp: Fix UHBR link M/N values
> >   drm/i915/dp_mst: Calculate the BW overhead in
> > intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp()
> >   drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN / MTP_TU size calculation for UHBR rates
> >   drm/i915/dp: Report a rounded-down value as the maximum data rate
> >   drm/i915/dp: Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate()
> >   drm/i915/dp: Reuse intel_dp_{max,effective}_data_rate in
> > intel_link_compute_m_n()
> >
> >  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |   5 +-
> >  .../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c |   3 +-
> >  .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c   |   5 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |  31 +++-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  51 ++
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   |  78 +++---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h   |   5 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  55 +--
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c   |   6 +-
> >  .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_dp_mst_helper_test.c| 145 ++
> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h   |  13 ++
> >  include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h   |   7 +-
> >  12 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> Jani Nikula, Intel


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values

2023-11-20 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023, Imre Deak  wrote:
> This is v2 of [1], with the following changes:
> - Store the pbn_div value in fixed point format.
> - Fix PBN calculation in patch 8.
> - Reuse intel_dp_max_data_rate(), intel_dp_effective_data_rate() in
>   intel_link_compute_m_n() (Jani).
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231113201110.510724-1-imre.d...@intel.com
>
> Cc: Arun R Murthy 
> Cc: Jani Nikula 
> Cc: Lyude Paul 
>
> Imre Deak (11):
>   drm/dp_mst: Store the MST PBN divider value in fixed point format
>   drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates
>   drm/dp_mst: Add kunit tests for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw()

Maarten, Maxime, Thomas, ack for merging these three via drm-intel-next?

Imre, I note that said patches were Cc: dri-devel, but for future
reference please Cc: the entire series to dri-devel when you include
dependencies that you plan to merge via drm-intel.

BR,
Jani.


>   drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with
> drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()
>   drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding efficiency on UHBR links
>   drm/i915/dp: Fix UHBR link M/N values
>   drm/i915/dp_mst: Calculate the BW overhead in
> intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp()
>   drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN / MTP_TU size calculation for UHBR rates
>   drm/i915/dp: Report a rounded-down value as the maximum data rate
>   drm/i915/dp: Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate()
>   drm/i915/dp: Reuse intel_dp_{max,effective}_data_rate in
> intel_link_compute_m_n()
>
>  .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |   5 +-
>  .../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c |   3 +-
>  .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c   |   5 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |  31 +++-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  51 ++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   |  78 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h   |   5 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  55 +--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c   |   6 +-
>  .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_dp_mst_helper_test.c| 145 ++
>  include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h   |  13 ++
>  include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h   |   7 +-
>  12 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 00/11] drm/i915: Fix UHBR data, link M/N/TU and PBN values

2023-11-16 Thread Imre Deak
This is v2 of [1], with the following changes:
- Store the pbn_div value in fixed point format.
- Fix PBN calculation in patch 8.
- Reuse intel_dp_max_data_rate(), intel_dp_effective_data_rate() in
  intel_link_compute_m_n() (Jani).

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231113201110.510724-1-imre.d...@intel.com

Cc: Arun R Murthy 
Cc: Jani Nikula 
Cc: Lyude Paul 

Imre Deak (11):
  drm/dp_mst: Store the MST PBN divider value in fixed point format
  drm/dp_mst: Fix PBN divider calculation for UHBR rates
  drm/dp_mst: Add kunit tests for drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw()
  drm/i915/dp: Replace intel_dp_is_uhbr_rate() with
drm_dp_is_uhbr_rate()
  drm/i915/dp: Account for channel coding efficiency on UHBR links
  drm/i915/dp: Fix UHBR link M/N values
  drm/i915/dp_mst: Calculate the BW overhead in
intel_dp_mst_find_vcpi_slots_for_bpp()
  drm/i915/dp_mst: Fix PBN / MTP_TU size calculation for UHBR rates
  drm/i915/dp: Report a rounded-down value as the maximum data rate
  drm/i915/dp: Simplify intel_dp_max_data_rate()
  drm/i915/dp: Reuse intel_dp_{max,effective}_data_rate in
intel_link_compute_m_n()

 .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c |   5 +-
 .../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c |   3 +-
 .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c   |   5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_topology.c |  31 +++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c  |  51 ++
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c   |  78 +++---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.h   |   5 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c   |  55 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/dispnv50/disp.c   |   6 +-
 .../gpu/drm/tests/drm_dp_mst_helper_test.c| 145 ++
 include/drm/display/drm_dp_helper.h   |  13 ++
 include/drm/display/drm_dp_mst_helper.h   |   7 +-
 12 files changed, 311 insertions(+), 93 deletions(-)

-- 
2.39.2