Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method

2020-07-07 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
Hello Hans,

On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:05:20PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Before I post a new version of this patch-set, you have only responded
> to some of the PWM patches in this set. Do you have any remarks on the
> other PWM patches ?

I stopped looking at them as I hoped someone would appear with a
datasheet. Given that this probably won't happen I can take a look at
the remaining patches.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method

2020-07-06 Thread Hans de Goede

Hi,

On 6/22/20 9:57 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 02:17:54PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:

Implement the pwm_ops.get_state() method to complete the support for the
new atomic PWM API.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
---
Changes in v3:
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by tag
- Remove extra whitespace to align some code after assignments (requested by
   Uwe Kleine-König)
---
  drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 29 +
  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
index 8a7f4707279c..b311354d40a3 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
@@ -119,8 +119,37 @@ static int crc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
pwm_device *pwm,
return 0;
  }
  
+static void crc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,

+  struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+   struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(chip);
+   struct device *dev = crc_pwm->chip.dev;
+   unsigned int clk_div, clk_div_reg, duty_cycle_reg;
+   int error;
+
+   error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, &clk_div_reg);
+   if (error) {
+   dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_CLK_DIV %d\n", error);
+   return;
+   }
+
+   error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE, &duty_cycle_reg);
+   if (error) {
+   dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE %d\n", error);
+   return;
+   }
+
+   clk_div = (clk_div_reg & ~PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE) + 1;
+
+   state->period = clk_div * NSEC_PER_USEC * 256 / PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ;
+   state->duty_cycle = duty_cycle_reg * state->period / PWM_MAX_LEVEL;


Please round up here.


Ok, I can fix that for the next version of this patch-set. Before I
post a new version of this patch-set, you have only responded to
some of the PWM patches in this set. Do you have any remarks on the
other PWM patches ?

Regards,

Hans

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method

2020-06-22 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 02:17:54PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Implement the pwm_ops.get_state() method to complete the support for the
> new atomic PWM API.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> - Add Andy's Reviewed-by tag
> - Remove extra whitespace to align some code after assignments (requested by
>   Uwe Kleine-König)
> ---
>  drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 29 +
>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> index 8a7f4707279c..b311354d40a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
> @@ -119,8 +119,37 @@ static int crc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
> pwm_device *pwm,
>   return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void crc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
> +struct pwm_state *state)
> +{
> + struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(chip);
> + struct device *dev = crc_pwm->chip.dev;
> + unsigned int clk_div, clk_div_reg, duty_cycle_reg;
> + int error;
> +
> + error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, &clk_div_reg);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_CLK_DIV %d\n", error);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE, &duty_cycle_reg);
> + if (error) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE %d\n", error);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + clk_div = (clk_div_reg & ~PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE) + 1;
> +
> + state->period = clk_div * NSEC_PER_USEC * 256 / PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ;
> + state->duty_cycle = duty_cycle_reg * state->period / PWM_MAX_LEVEL;

Please round up here.

> + state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
> + state->enabled = !!(clk_div_reg & PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE);
> +}
> +

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.   | Uwe Kleine-König|
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx


[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 11/15] pwm: crc: Implement get_state() method

2020-06-20 Thread Hans de Goede
Implement the pwm_ops.get_state() method to complete the support for the
new atomic PWM API.

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko 
Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede 
---
Changes in v3:
- Add Andy's Reviewed-by tag
- Remove extra whitespace to align some code after assignments (requested by
  Uwe Kleine-König)
---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c | 29 +
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
index 8a7f4707279c..b311354d40a3 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-crc.c
@@ -119,8 +119,37 @@ static int crc_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct 
pwm_device *pwm,
return 0;
 }
 
+static void crc_pwm_get_state(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+  struct pwm_state *state)
+{
+   struct crystalcove_pwm *crc_pwm = to_crc_pwm(chip);
+   struct device *dev = crc_pwm->chip.dev;
+   unsigned int clk_div, clk_div_reg, duty_cycle_reg;
+   int error;
+
+   error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_CLK_DIV, &clk_div_reg);
+   if (error) {
+   dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_CLK_DIV %d\n", error);
+   return;
+   }
+
+   error = regmap_read(crc_pwm->regmap, PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE, &duty_cycle_reg);
+   if (error) {
+   dev_err(dev, "Error reading PWM0_DUTY_CYCLE %d\n", error);
+   return;
+   }
+
+   clk_div = (clk_div_reg & ~PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE) + 1;
+
+   state->period = clk_div * NSEC_PER_USEC * 256 / PWM_BASE_CLK_MHZ;
+   state->duty_cycle = duty_cycle_reg * state->period / PWM_MAX_LEVEL;
+   state->polarity = PWM_POLARITY_NORMAL;
+   state->enabled = !!(clk_div_reg & PWM_OUTPUT_ENABLE);
+}
+
 static const struct pwm_ops crc_pwm_ops = {
.apply = crc_pwm_apply,
+   .get_state = crc_pwm_get_state,
 };
 
 static int crystalcove_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
2.26.2

___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx