Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/debugfs : PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES registers
> -Original Message-
> From: Nikula, Jani
> Sent: Friday, February 12, 2021 6:34 PM
> To: S, Saichandana ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; Gupta, Anshuman
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/i915/debugfs : PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES registers
>
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2021, Saichandana S wrote:
> > This debugfs provides the display PM debug information like Time to
> > Next VBI and Time to Next Fill from Display Engine <-> PCU Mailbox.
>
> We still lack a rationale for this and the test design. In past review, I got
> the
> impression that a) you need the wakeref, but b) grabbing the wakeref messes up
> the test.
>
> What are you testing? What are you trying to achieve?
Earlier the rational was to use this debugfs to expose "DC9 Ready" bit to igt
along with other
debug attributes.
As Chris commented it is a bad design of test, "DC9 Ready" bit is dropped from
this patch.
Now this debugfs only serves the Display Engine to PCU mailbox debug attributes
which can read
while i915 is active. Usually these DE <-> PCU req and res debug attributes
retrieve by external tools
like jtag.
Now this debugs only provides value addition to decode some of these debug
attributes and print.
in readable format.
Br,
Anshuman Gupta.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> PS. You leak the wakeref and stay up indefinitely if csr isn't loaded.
>
> >
> > V2:
> > Added a functional print to debugfs. [Jani Nikula]
> >
> > V3:
> > Used separate variables to store the register values and also used
> > REG_GENMASK and REG_BIT for mask preparation. [Anshuman Gupta]
> >
> > Removed reading of register contents. Replaced local variable with yesno().
> > Placed register macros separately, distinguishing from other macros.
> > [Jani Nikula]
> >
> > V4 : Used i915 as local variable. [Anshuman Gupta, Jani Nikula]
> >
> > V5 : Added wakeref to wakeup device. [Chris Wilson]
> > Signed-off-by: Saichandana S
> > ---
> > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 24 +++
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++
> > 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > index d6e4a9237bda..29aaa41fdeec 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> > @@ -591,6 +591,29 @@ static int i915_dmc_info(struct seq_file *m, void
> *unused)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +static int i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > +{
> > + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
> > + struct intel_csr *csr = &i915->csr;
> > + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> > +
> > + if (!HAS_CSR(i915))
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
> > + if (!csr->dmc_payload)
> > + return 0;
>
> Leak.
>
> > + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next Fill : 0x%08x\n",
> > + intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) &
> PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK);
> > + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next VBI : 0x%08x\n",
> > + (intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) &
> PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK) >> 16);
> > + seq_printf(m, "Selective Exit Latency : 0x%08x\n",
> > + intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_1) &
> > +PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK);
> > +
> > + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void intel_seq_print_mode(struct seq_file *m, int tabs,
> > const struct drm_display_mode *mode) { @@
> -2128,6 +2151,7 @@
> > static const struct drm_info_list intel_display_debugfs_list[] = {
> > {"i915_edp_psr_status", i915_edp_psr_status, 0},
> > {"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0},
> > {"i915_dmc_info", i915_dmc_info, 0},
> > + {"i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info", i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info, 0},
> > {"i915_display_info", i915_display_info, 0},
> > {"i915_shared_dplls_info", i915_shared_dplls_info, 0},
> > {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0}, diff --git
> > a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > index 224ad897af34..93d319bf80fd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > @@ -12525,4 +12525,13 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> > #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX0x2
> > #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT0x4
> >
> > +/*These registers are of functional registers for PM debug request and
> response registers*/
> > +#define PM_REQ_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x45284)
> > +#define PM_REQ_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45288)
> > +#define PM_RSP_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x4528C)
> > +#define PM_RESP_TTNF_MASKREG_GENMASK(15, 0)
> > +#define PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 16)
> > +#define PM_RSP_DBG_1
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/debugfs : PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES registers
On Tue, 09 Feb 2021, Saichandana S wrote:
> This debugfs provides the display PM debug information like Time
> to Next VBI and Time to Next Fill from Display Engine <-> PCU Mailbox.
We still lack a rationale for this and the test design. In past review,
I got the impression that a) you need the wakeref, but b) grabbing the
wakeref messes up the test.
What are you testing? What are you trying to achieve?
BR,
Jani.
PS. You leak the wakeref and stay up indefinitely if csr isn't loaded.
>
> V2:
> Added a functional print to debugfs. [Jani Nikula]
>
> V3:
> Used separate variables to store the register values and also
> used REG_GENMASK and REG_BIT for mask preparation. [Anshuman Gupta]
>
> Removed reading of register contents. Replaced local variable with yesno().
> Placed register macros separately, distinguishing from other
> macros. [Jani Nikula]
>
> V4 : Used i915 as local variable. [Anshuman Gupta, Jani Nikula]
>
> V5 : Added wakeref to wakeup device. [Chris Wilson]
> Signed-off-by: Saichandana S
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 24 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index d6e4a9237bda..29aaa41fdeec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -591,6 +591,29 @@ static int i915_dmc_info(struct seq_file *m, void
> *unused)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
> + struct intel_csr *csr = &i915->csr;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +
> + if (!HAS_CSR(i915))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
> + if (!csr->dmc_payload)
> + return 0;
Leak.
> + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next Fill : 0x%08x\n",
> +intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) & PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK);
> + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next VBI : 0x%08x\n",
> +(intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) & PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK) >>
> 16);
> + seq_printf(m, "Selective Exit Latency : 0x%08x\n",
> +intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_1) &
> PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK);
> +
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void intel_seq_print_mode(struct seq_file *m, int tabs,
>const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
> {
> @@ -2128,6 +2151,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list
> intel_display_debugfs_list[] = {
> {"i915_edp_psr_status", i915_edp_psr_status, 0},
> {"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0},
> {"i915_dmc_info", i915_dmc_info, 0},
> + {"i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info", i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info, 0},
> {"i915_display_info", i915_display_info, 0},
> {"i915_shared_dplls_info", i915_shared_dplls_info, 0},
> {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0},
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> index 224ad897af34..93d319bf80fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -12525,4 +12525,13 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX 0x2
> #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT 0x4
>
> +/*These registers are of functional registers for PM debug request and
> response registers*/
> +#define PM_REQ_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x45284)
> +#define PM_REQ_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45288)
> +#define PM_RSP_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x4528C)
> +#define PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASKREG_GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define PM_RSP_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45290)
> +#define PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK REG_GENMASK(2, 0)
> +
> #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/debugfs : PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES registers
> -Original Message-
> From: S, Saichandana
> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 7:02 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Nikula, Jani ; ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk; Gupta,
> Anshuman
> Subject: [PATCH v5] drm/i915/debugfs : PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES registers
I would have kept the patch name "Add PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES Debugfs"
>
> This debugfs provides the display PM debug information like Time to Next VBI
> and Time to Next Fill from Display Engine <-> PCU Mailbox.
>
> V2:
> Added a functional print to debugfs. [Jani Nikula]
>
> V3:
> Used separate variables to store the register values and also used
> REG_GENMASK and REG_BIT for mask preparation. [Anshuman Gupta]
>
> Removed reading of register contents. Replaced local variable with yesno().
> Placed register macros separately, distinguishing from other macros. [Jani
> Nikula]
>
> V4 : Used i915 as local variable. [Anshuman Gupta, Jani Nikula]
>
> V5 : Added wakeref to wakeup device. [Chris Wilson]
> Signed-off-by: Saichandana S
> ---
> .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 24 +++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> index d6e4a9237bda..29aaa41fdeec 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
> @@ -591,6 +591,29 @@ static int i915_dmc_info(struct seq_file *m, void
> *unused)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused) {
> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
> + struct intel_csr *csr = &i915->csr;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +
> + if (!HAS_CSR(i915))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
> + if (!csr->dmc_payload)
> + return 0;
> + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next Fill : 0x%08x\n",
> +intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) &
These values including TTNVBI are in microseconds, you can print the
decimal values in micro seconds to keep it human readable format.
Thanks,
Anshuman Gupta.
> PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK);
> + seq_printf(m, "Time to Next VBI : 0x%08x\n",
> +(intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) &
> PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK) >> 16);
> + seq_printf(m, "Selective Exit Latency : 0x%08x\n",
> +intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_1) &
> +PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK);
> +
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static void intel_seq_print_mode(struct seq_file *m, int tabs,
>const struct drm_display_mode *mode) { @@
> -2128,6 +2151,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list
> intel_display_debugfs_list[] = {
> {"i915_edp_psr_status", i915_edp_psr_status, 0},
> {"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0},
> {"i915_dmc_info", i915_dmc_info, 0},
> + {"i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info", i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info, 0},
> {"i915_display_info", i915_display_info, 0},
> {"i915_shared_dplls_info", i915_shared_dplls_info, 0},
> {"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0}, diff --git
> a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index
> 224ad897af34..93d319bf80fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> @@ -12525,4 +12525,13 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
> #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX 0x2
> #define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT 0x4
>
> +/*These registers are of functional registers for PM debug request and
> response registers*/
> +#define PM_REQ_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x45284)
> +#define PM_REQ_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45288)
> +#define PM_RSP_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x4528C)
> +#define PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK REG_GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASKREG_GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define PM_RSP_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45290)
> +#define PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK REG_GENMASK(2, 0)
> +
> #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
> --
> 2.30.0
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5] drm/i915/debugfs : PCU PM_REQ and PM_RES registers
This debugfs provides the display PM debug information like Time
to Next VBI and Time to Next Fill from Display Engine <-> PCU Mailbox.
V2:
Added a functional print to debugfs. [Jani Nikula]
V3:
Used separate variables to store the register values and also
used REG_GENMASK and REG_BIT for mask preparation. [Anshuman Gupta]
Removed reading of register contents. Replaced local variable with yesno().
Placed register macros separately, distinguishing from other
macros. [Jani Nikula]
V4 : Used i915 as local variable. [Anshuman Gupta, Jani Nikula]
V5 : Added wakeref to wakeup device. [Chris Wilson]
Signed-off-by: Saichandana S
---
.../drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c | 24 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 9 +++
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
index d6e4a9237bda..29aaa41fdeec 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_debugfs.c
@@ -591,6 +591,29 @@ static int i915_dmc_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
return 0;
}
+static int i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
+{
+ struct drm_i915_private *i915 = node_to_i915(m->private);
+ struct intel_csr *csr = &i915->csr;
+ intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
+
+ if (!HAS_CSR(i915))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm);
+ if (!csr->dmc_payload)
+ return 0;
+ seq_printf(m, "Time to Next Fill : 0x%08x\n",
+ intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) & PM_RESP_TTNF_MASK);
+ seq_printf(m, "Time to Next VBI : 0x%08x\n",
+ (intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_0) & PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK) >>
16);
+ seq_printf(m, "Selective Exit Latency : 0x%08x\n",
+ intel_de_read(i915, PM_RSP_DBG_1) &
PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASK);
+
+ intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
+ return 0;
+}
+
static void intel_seq_print_mode(struct seq_file *m, int tabs,
const struct drm_display_mode *mode)
{
@@ -2128,6 +2151,7 @@ static const struct drm_info_list
intel_display_debugfs_list[] = {
{"i915_edp_psr_status", i915_edp_psr_status, 0},
{"i915_power_domain_info", i915_power_domain_info, 0},
{"i915_dmc_info", i915_dmc_info, 0},
+ {"i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info", i915_pcu_pm_req_res_info, 0},
{"i915_display_info", i915_display_info, 0},
{"i915_shared_dplls_info", i915_shared_dplls_info, 0},
{"i915_dp_mst_info", i915_dp_mst_info, 0},
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
index 224ad897af34..93d319bf80fd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
@@ -12525,4 +12525,13 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULX0x2
#define TGL_ROOT_DEVICE_SKU_ULT0x4
+/*These registers are of functional registers for PM debug request and
response registers*/
+#define PM_REQ_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x45284)
+#define PM_REQ_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45288)
+#define PM_RSP_DBG_0 _MMIO(0x4528C)
+#define PM_RESP_TTNF_MASKREG_GENMASK(15, 0)
+#define PM_RESP_TTNVBI_MASK REG_GENMASK(31, 16)
+#define PM_RSP_DBG_1 _MMIO(0x45290)
+#define PM_RESP_SEL_EXIT_LATENCY_MASKREG_GENMASK(2, 0)
+
#endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
--
2.30.0
___
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
