Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Avoid reading OA reports before they land

2023-06-07 Thread Umesh Nerlige Ramappa 

On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 11:44:21PM +, Patchwork wrote:

  Patch Details

Series:  Avoid reading OA reports before they land
URL: [1]https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/118886/
State:   failure
Details: 
[2]https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/index.html

 CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13232 -> Patchwork_118886v1

Summary

  FAILURE

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_118886v1 absolutely need to
  be
  verified manually.

  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_118886v1, please notify your bug team to allow
  them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
  CI.

  External URL:
  https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/index.html

Participating hosts (37 -> 37)

  Additional (1): bat-rpls-2
  Missing (1): fi-snb-2520m

Possible new issues

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
  Patchwork_118886v1:

 IGT changes

   Possible regressions

* igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines:

 * fi-apl-guc: [3]PASS -> [4]DMESG-WARN +2 similar issues


<3> [309.685038] i915 :00:02.0: [drm] *ERROR* Failed to probe lspcon

This warning is not related to OA or any use case from this patch.



   Warnings

* igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff:

 * bat-rplp-1: [5]SKIP ([6]i915#1072) -> [7]ABORT


+ John

These are not related to OA, but a known lockdep issue.

<4>[  229.036305] ==
<4>[  229.036320] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4>[  229.036334] 6.4.0-rc5-Patchwork_118886v1-g450d228e3840+ #1 Not tainted
<4>[  229.036348] --
<4>[  229.036362] kworker/0:0H/8 is trying to acquire lock:
<4>[  229.036374] 888117b74f48 (>->reset.backoff_srcu){}-{0:0}, at: 
_intel_gt_reset_lock+0x0/0x330 [i915]
<4>[  229.036503] but task is already holding lock:
<4>[  229.036521] c90d3e60 
((work_completion)(&(&guc->timestamp.work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: 
process_one_work+0x1cc/0x510
<4>[  229.036548] which lock already depends on the new lock.

<4>[  229.036574] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4>[  229.036598] -> #3 
((work_completion)(&(&guc->timestamp.work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
<4>[  229.036624]lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4>[  229.036636]__flush_work+0x74/0x530
<4>[  229.036646]__cancel_work_timer+0x14f/0x1f0
<4>[  229.036658]intel_guc_submission_reset_prepare+0x81/0x4b0 [i915]
<4>[  229.036799]intel_uc_reset_prepare+0x9c/0x120 [i915]
<4>[  229.036938]reset_prepare+0x21/0x60 [i915]
<4>[  229.037054]intel_gt_reset+0x1dd/0x470 [i915]
<4>[  229.037172]intel_gt_reset_global+0xfb/0x170 [i915]
<4>[  229.037285]intel_gt_handle_error+0x368/0x420 [i915]
<4>[  229.037401]intel_gt_debugfs_reset_store+0x5c/0xc0 [i915]
<4>[  229.037509]i915_wedged_set+0x29/0x40 [i915]
<4>[  229.037600]simple_attr_write_xsigned.constprop.0+0xb4/0x110
<4>[  229.037616]full_proxy_write+0x52/0x80
<4>[  229.037627]vfs_write+0xc5/0x4f0
<4>[  229.037637]ksys_write+0x64/0xe0
<4>[  229.037646]do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90
<4>[  229.037658]entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
<4>[  229.037672] -> #2 (>->reset.mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
<4>[  229.037694]lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4>[  229.037704]i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex+0x31/0x50 [i915]
<4>[  229.037835]intel_gt_init_reset+0x65/0x80 [i915]
<4>[  229.037948]intel_gt_common_init_early+0xe1/0x170 [i915]
<4>[  229.038055]intel_root_gt_init_early+0x48/0x60 [i915]
<4>[  229.038158]i915_driver_probe+0x243/0xcd0 [i915]
<4>[  229.038247]i915_pci_probe+0xdc/0x210 [i915]
<4>[  229.038335]pci_device_probe+0x95/0x120
<4>[  229.038347]really_probe+0x164/0x3c0
<4>[  229.038358]__driver_probe_device+0x73/0x160
<4>[  229.038371]driver_probe_device+0x19/0xa0
<4>[  229.038384]__driver_attach+0xb6/0x180
<4>[  229.038395]bus_for_each_dev+0x77/0xd0
<4>[  229.038405]bus_add_driver+0x114/0x210
<4>[  229.038415]driver_register+0x5b/0x110
<4>[  229.038425]0xa00fd033
<4>[  229.038439]do_one_initcall+0x57/0x270
<4>[  229.038450]do_init_module+0x5f/0x220
<4>[  229.038461]load_module+0x1ca4/0x1f00
<4>[  229.038472]__do_sys_finit_module+0xb4/0x130
<4>[  229.038484]do_syscall_64+0x3c/0x90
<4>[  229.038495]entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
<4>[  229.038508] -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
<4>[  229.038528]lock_acquire+0xd8/0x2d0
<4>[  229.038538]fs_reclaim_acquire+0xac/0xe0
<4>[  229.038550]__kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x30/0x1b0
<4>[  229.038563]kmalloc_trace+0x24/0xb0
<4>[  229.039296]kernfs_fop_open+0xc0/0x3d0
<4>[  229.040028]do_d

[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Avoid reading OA reports before they land

2023-06-05 Thread Patchwork 
== Series Details ==

Series: Avoid reading OA reports before they land
URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/118886/
State : failure

== Summary ==

CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_13232 -> Patchwork_118886v1


Summary
---

  **FAILURE**

  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_118886v1 absolutely need to be
  verified manually.
  
  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
  introduced in Patchwork_118886v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

  External URL: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/index.html

Participating hosts (37 -> 37)
--

  Additional (1): bat-rpls-2 
  Missing(1): fi-snb-2520m 

Possible new issues
---

  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in 
Patchwork_118886v1:

### IGT changes ###

 Possible regressions 

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines:
- fi-apl-guc: [PASS][1] -> [DMESG-WARN][2] +2 similar issues
   [1]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13232/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines.html
   [2]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_timelines.html

  
 Warnings 

  * igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff:
- bat-rplp-1: [SKIP][3] ([i915#1072]) -> [ABORT][4]
   [3]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13232/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff.html
   [4]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rplp-1/igt@kms_psr@sprite_plane_onoff.html

  
Known issues


  Here are the changes found in Patchwork_118886v1 that come from known issues:

### IGT changes ###

 Issues hit 

  * igt@debugfs_test@basic-hwmon:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][5] ([i915#7456])
   [5]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@debugfs_t...@basic-hwmon.html

  * igt@fbdev@read:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][6] ([i915#2582]) +4 similar issues
   [6]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@fb...@read.html

  * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@verify-random:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][7] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
   [7]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@verify-random.html

  * igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([i915#3282])
   [8]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@gem_tiled_pread_basic.html

  * igt@i915_pm_backlight@basic-brightness:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([i915#7561])
   [9]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_pm_backli...@basic-brightness.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- fi-apl-guc: [PASS][10] -> [DMESG-WARN][11] ([i915#180] / 
[i915#1982] / [i915#7634])
   [10]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13232/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_pm_...@module-reload.html
   [11]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_pm_...@module-reload.html

  * igt@i915_pm_rps@basic-api:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#6621])
   [12]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_pm_...@basic-api.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@execlists:
- fi-bsw-nick:[PASS][13] -> [ABORT][14] ([i915#7911] / [i915#7913])
   [13]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13232/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html
   [14]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/fi-bsw-nick/igt@i915_selftest@l...@execlists.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-FAIL][15] ([i915#4258] / [i915#7913])
   [15]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@live@gt_pm.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
- bat-rpls-2: NOTRUN -> [ABORT][16] ([i915#4983] / [i915#7913])
   [16]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-2/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@reset:
- fi-apl-guc: [PASS][17] -> [DMESG-WARN][18] ([i915#7634]) +33 
similar issues
   [17]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_13232/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@reset.html
   [18]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/fi-apl-guc/igt@i915_selftest@l...@reset.html

  * igt@i915_selftest@live@slpc:
- bat-rpls-1: NOTRUN -> [DMESG-WARN][19] ([i915#6367])
   [19]: 
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_118886v1/bat-rpls-1/igt@i915_selftest@l...@slpc.html

  * igt@i915_suspend@basic-s2idle-without-i915:
- fi-apl-guc: [PASS][