Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce struct cdclk_step
On Sun, 18 Sep 2022 23:35:56 -0700, Vudum, Lakshminarayana wrote:
>
Hi Lakshmi,
> Filed a couple of issues and re-reported.
>
> This one Likely a regression?
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6864
> Few tests - dmesg-warn/dmesg-fail/incomplete -BUG: unable to handle page
> fault for address .*, #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode, RIP:
> 0010:__list_add_valid, Call Trace: dma_fence_default_wait,
> dma_fence_add_callback
>
> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6863
> igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries - incomplete - BUG: unable to handle page
> fault for address: c9bb81a8, RIP: 0010:gen2_read32
Not sure about https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6864, I
didn't see it.
I was mentioning
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6863. This is a
regression. I have already submitted a fix for it:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/108747/
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
> Lakshmi.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dixit, Ashutosh
> Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 7:08 PM
> To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana
>
> Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce struct cdclk_step
>
> On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 18:35:13 -0700, Patchwork wrote:
> >
>
> Hi Lakshmi,
>
> > Series: Introduce struct cdclk_step
> > URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/108685/
> > State: failure
> > Details:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
> >
> > CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12148 -> Patchwork_108685v1
> >
> > Summary
> >
> > FAILURE
> >
> > Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_108685v1 absolutely need
> > to be verified manually.
> >
> > If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> > introduced in Patchwork_108685v1, please notify your bug team to allow
> > them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives
> > in CI.
> >
> > External URL:
> > https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
> >
> > Participating hosts (43 -> 41)
> >
> > Additional (2): fi-icl-u2 fi-pnv-d510
> > Missing (4): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bdw-samus bat-dg1-5
> >
> > Possible new issues
> >
> > Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> > Patchwork_108685v1:
> >
> > IGT changes
> >
> > Possible regressions
> >
> > • igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries:
> > □ fi-pnv-d510: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE
>
> This failure is unrelated and needs a new bug. Seems to be caused by:
>
> fe5979665f640 ("drm/i915/debugfs: Add perf_limit_reasons in debugfs")
>
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce struct cdclk_step
Filed a couple of issues and re-reported.
This one Likely a regression?
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6864
Few tests - dmesg-warn/dmesg-fail/incomplete -BUG: unable to handle page fault
for address .*, #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode, RIP:
0010:__list_add_valid, Call Trace: dma_fence_default_wait,
dma_fence_add_callback
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6863
igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries - incomplete - BUG: unable to handle page
fault for address: c9bb81a8, RIP: 0010:gen2_read32
Lakshmi.
-Original Message-
From: Dixit, Ashutosh
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2022 7:08 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Vudum, Lakshminarayana
Cc: Srivatsa, Anusha
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce struct cdclk_step
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 18:35:13 -0700, Patchwork wrote:
>
Hi Lakshmi,
> Series: Introduce struct cdclk_step
> URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/108685/
> State: failure
> Details:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12148 -> Patchwork_108685v1
>
> Summary
>
> FAILURE
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_108685v1 absolutely need
> to be verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_108685v1, please notify your bug team to allow
> them to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in
> CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
>
> Participating hosts (43 -> 41)
>
> Additional (2): fi-icl-u2 fi-pnv-d510
> Missing (4): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bdw-samus bat-dg1-5
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_108685v1:
>
> IGT changes
>
> Possible regressions
>
> • igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries:
> □ fi-pnv-d510: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE
This failure is unrelated and needs a new bug. Seems to be caused by:
fe5979665f640 ("drm/i915/debugfs: Add perf_limit_reasons in debugfs")
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce struct cdclk_step
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 18:35:13 -0700, Patchwork wrote:
>
Hi Lakshmi,
> Series: Introduce struct cdclk_step
> URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/108685/
> State: failure
> Details:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12148 -> Patchwork_108685v1
>
> Summary
>
> FAILURE
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_108685v1 absolutely need to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_108685v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
> External URL:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
>
> Participating hosts (43 -> 41)
>
> Additional (2): fi-icl-u2 fi-pnv-d510
> Missing (4): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bdw-samus bat-dg1-5
>
> Possible new issues
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_108685v1:
>
> IGT changes
>
> Possible regressions
>
> • igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries:
> □ fi-pnv-d510: NOTRUN -> INCOMPLETE
This failure is unrelated and needs a new bug. Seems to be caused by:
fe5979665f640 ("drm/i915/debugfs: Add perf_limit_reasons in debugfs")
Thanks.
--
Ashutosh
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Introduce struct cdclk_step
== Series Details ==
Series: Introduce struct cdclk_step
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/108685/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_12148 -> Patchwork_108685v1
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_108685v1 absolutely need to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_108685v1, please notify your bug team to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
External URL:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/index.html
Participating hosts (43 -> 41)
--
Additional (2): fi-icl-u2 fi-pnv-d510
Missing(4): fi-ctg-p8600 fi-hsw-4200u fi-bdw-samus bat-dg1-5
Possible new issues
---
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_108685v1:
### IGT changes ###
Possible regressions
* igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries:
- fi-pnv-d510:NOTRUN -> [INCOMPLETE][1]
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-pnv-d510/igt@debugfs_test@read_all_entries.html
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_108685v1 that come from known issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@gem_huc_copy@huc-copy:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][2] ([i915#2190])
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_huc_c...@huc-copy.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@random-engines:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3] ([i915#4613]) +3 similar issues
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@random-engines.html
* igt@i915_selftest@live@requests:
- fi-blb-e6850: [PASS][4] -> [DMESG-FAIL][5] ([i915#4528])
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12148/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-blb-e6850/igt@i915_selftest@l...@requests.html
* igt@i915_suspend@basic-s3-without-i915:
- fi-bdw-5557u: [PASS][6] -> [INCOMPLETE][7] ([i915#146] /
[i915#6598] / [i915#6712])
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12148/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_susp...@basic-s3-without-i915.html
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-bdw-5557u/igt@i915_susp...@basic-s3-without-i915.html
* igt@kms_chamelium@hdmi-hpd-fast:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][8] ([fdo#111827]) +8 similar issues
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_chamel...@hdmi-hpd-fast.html
* igt@kms_cursor_legacy@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][9] ([i915#4103])
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_cursor_leg...@basic-busy-flip-before-cursor.html
* igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-connector-state:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [WARN][10] ([i915#6008])
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_force_connector_ba...@force-connector-state.html
* igt@kms_force_connector_basic@force-load-detect:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][11] ([fdo#109285])
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_force_connector_ba...@force-load-detect.html
* igt@kms_setmode@basic-clone-single-crtc:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#3555])
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@kms_setm...@basic-clone-single-crtc.html
* igt@prime_vgem@basic-userptr:
- fi-icl-u2: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109295] / [i915#3301])
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-icl-u2/igt@prime_v...@basic-userptr.html
* igt@runner@aborted:
- fi-pnv-d510:NOTRUN -> [FAIL][14] ([i915#2403] / [i915#4312])
[14]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-pnv-d510/igt@run...@aborted.html
- fi-blb-e6850: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][15] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#2403] /
[i915#4312])
[15]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/fi-blb-e6850/igt@run...@aborted.html
Possible fixes
* igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic-s0@smem:
- {bat-adlm-1}: [DMESG-WARN][16] ([i915#2867]) -> [PASS][17]
[16]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12148/bat-adlm-1/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html
[17]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108685v1/bat-adlm-1/igt@gem_exec_suspend@basic...@smem.html
* igt@i915_pm_rpm@module-reload:
- {fi-tgl-mst}: [DMESG-WARN][18] ([i915#5537]) -> [PASS][19]
[18]:
