Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no hwconfig support on ADL-N
Filed a new issue https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/6085
igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding - incomplete - No
warnings/errors
Thanks,
Lakshmi.
-Original Message-
From: Roper, Matthew D
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2022 4:56 PM
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Vivekanandan, Balasubramani ; Vudum,
Lakshminarayana
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no
hwconfig support on ADL-N
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 08:16:36PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no hwconfig support on ADL-N
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104270/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11690_full -> Patchwork_104270v1_full
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_104270v1_full absolutely need
> to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_104270v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (13 -> 12)
> --
>
> Missing(1): shard-rkl
>
> Possible new issues
> ---
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_104270v1_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>[1]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_cursor_...@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
>[2]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-tglb
> 8/igt@kms_cursor_...@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
Seems like the machine or network died; the logs just cut off with no
indication of a problem before that point. And ADL-N hwconfig change wouldn't
impact the behavior of a TGL display test, so not related to Bala's patch here.
Patch applied to drm-intel-gt-next. Thanks for the patch.
Matt
>
>
> Suppressed
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * {igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1}:
> - {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3]
>[3]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-dg1-
> 16/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-swi...@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html
>
>
> New tests
> -
>
> New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_11690_full and
> Patchwork_104270v1_full:
>
> ### New IGT tests (7) ###
>
> * igt@gem_busy@parallel:
> - Statuses :
> - Exec time: [None] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@a-dp1:
> - Statuses : 2 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [4.03, 4.20] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@b-dp1:
> - Statuses : 2 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [3.92, 4.06] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@c-dp1:
> - Statuses : 2 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [3.99, 4.11] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-edp1:
> - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [11.53] s
>
> * igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2:
> - Statuses :
> - Exec time: [None] s
>
> * igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-idle-check-all:
> - Statuses :
> - Exec time: [None] s
>
>
>
> Known issues
>
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_104270v1_full that come from known
> issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Issues hit
>
> * igt@feature_discovery@display-2x:
> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839])
>[4]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb
> 5/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
> - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2846])
>[5]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
> - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2846])
>[6]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-apl2
> /igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0:
> - shard-apl: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar
> issue
>[7]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vecs0.html
>[8]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-apl4
> /igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vecs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
>[9]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb
> 6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-s...@rcs0.html
>
Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no hwconfig support on ADL-N
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 08:16:36PM +, Patchwork wrote:
> == Series Details ==
>
> Series: drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no hwconfig support on ADL-N
> URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104270/
> State : failure
>
> == Summary ==
>
> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11690_full -> Patchwork_104270v1_full
>
>
> Summary
> ---
>
> **FAILURE**
>
> Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_104270v1_full absolutely need
> to be
> verified manually.
>
> If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
> introduced in Patchwork_104270v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow
> them
> to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
>
>
>
> Participating hosts (13 -> 12)
> --
>
> Missing(1): shard-rkl
>
> Possible new issues
> ---
>
> Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
> Patchwork_104270v1_full:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Possible regressions
>
> * igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding:
> - shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
>[1]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_cursor_...@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
>[2]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_cursor_...@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
Seems like the machine or network died; the logs just cut off with no
indication of a problem before that point. And ADL-N hwconfig change
wouldn't impact the behavior of a TGL display test, so not related to
Bala's patch here.
Patch applied to drm-intel-gt-next. Thanks for the patch.
Matt
>
>
> Suppressed
>
> The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
> They do not affect the overall result.
>
> * {igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1}:
> - {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3]
>[3]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-dg1-16/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-swi...@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html
>
>
> New tests
> -
>
> New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_11690_full and
> Patchwork_104270v1_full:
>
> ### New IGT tests (7) ###
>
> * igt@gem_busy@parallel:
> - Statuses :
> - Exec time: [None] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@a-dp1:
> - Statuses : 2 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [4.03, 4.20] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@b-dp1:
> - Statuses : 2 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [3.92, 4.06] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@c-dp1:
> - Statuses : 2 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [3.99, 4.11] s
>
> * igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-edp1:
> - Statuses : 1 pass(s)
> - Exec time: [11.53] s
>
> * igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2:
> - Statuses :
> - Exec time: [None] s
>
> * igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-idle-check-all:
> - Statuses :
> - Exec time: [None] s
>
>
>
> Known issues
>
>
> Here are the changes found in Patchwork_104270v1_full that come from known
> issues:
>
> ### IGT changes ###
>
> Issues hit
>
> * igt@feature_discovery@display-2x:
> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839])
>[4]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
> - shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2846])
>[5]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
> - shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2846])
>[6]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0:
> - shard-apl: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar
> issue
>[7]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vecs0.html
>[8]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-apl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vecs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
>[9]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-s...@rcs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0:
> - shard-glk: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842])
>[10]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs0.html
>[11]:
> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs0.html
>
> * igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
> - shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#4613])
>[12]:
>
[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no hwconfig support on ADL-N
== Series Details ==
Series: drm/i915/hwconfig: Report no hwconfig support on ADL-N
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/104270/
State : failure
== Summary ==
CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_11690_full -> Patchwork_104270v1_full
Summary
---
**FAILURE**
Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_104270v1_full absolutely need
to be
verified manually.
If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in Patchwork_104270v1_full, please notify your bug team to allow
them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.
Participating hosts (13 -> 12)
--
Missing(1): shard-rkl
Possible new issues
---
Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
Patchwork_104270v1_full:
### IGT changes ###
Possible regressions
* igt@kms_cursor_crc@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding:
- shard-tglb: [PASS][1] -> [INCOMPLETE][2]
[1]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-tglb1/igt@kms_cursor_...@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
[2]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-tglb8/igt@kms_cursor_...@pipe-a-cursor-256x256-sliding.html
Suppressed
The following results come from untrusted machines, tests, or statuses.
They do not affect the overall result.
* {igt@kms_hdr@bpc-switch@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1}:
- {shard-dg1}:NOTRUN -> [SKIP][3]
[3]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-dg1-16/igt@kms_hdr@bpc-swi...@pipe-a-hdmi-a-1.html
New tests
-
New tests have been introduced between CI_DRM_11690_full and
Patchwork_104270v1_full:
### New IGT tests (7) ###
* igt@gem_busy@parallel:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@a-dp1:
- Statuses : 2 pass(s)
- Exec time: [4.03, 4.20] s
* igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@b-dp1:
- Statuses : 2 pass(s)
- Exec time: [3.92, 4.06] s
* igt@kms_flip@modeset-vs-vblank-race@c-dp1:
- Statuses : 2 pass(s)
- Exec time: [3.99, 4.11] s
* igt@kms_flip@plain-flip-fb-recreate-interruptible@c-edp1:
- Statuses : 1 pass(s)
- Exec time: [11.53] s
* igt@perf_pmu@busy-accuracy-2:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
* igt@perf_pmu@most-busy-idle-check-all:
- Statuses :
- Exec time: [None] s
Known issues
Here are the changes found in Patchwork_104270v1_full that come from known
issues:
### IGT changes ###
Issues hit
* igt@feature_discovery@display-2x:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][4] ([i915#1839])
[4]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb5/igt@feature_discov...@display-2x.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-deadline:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][5] ([i915#2846])
[5]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
- shard-apl: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][6] ([i915#2846])
[6]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-apl2/igt@gem_exec_f...@basic-deadline.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-none@vecs0:
- shard-apl: [PASS][7] -> [FAIL][8] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
[7]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-apl6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vecs0.html
[8]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-apl4/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-n...@vecs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-solo@rcs0:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [FAIL][9] ([i915#2842]) +1 similar issue
[9]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace-s...@rcs0.html
* igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-pace@vcs0:
- shard-glk: [PASS][10] -> [FAIL][11] ([i915#2842])
[10]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_11690/shard-glk8/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs0.html
[11]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-glk3/igt@gem_exec_fair@basic-p...@vcs0.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@basic:
- shard-iclb: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][12] ([i915#4613])
[12]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-iclb6/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@basic.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@heavy-random:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][13] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613]) +6
similar issues
[13]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-skl10/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@heavy-random.html
* igt@gem_lmem_swapping@verify:
- shard-kbl: NOTRUN -> [SKIP][14] ([fdo#109271] / [i915#4613])
[14]:
https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_104270v1/shard-kbl6/igt@gem_lmem_swapp...@verify.html
* igt@gem_pwrite@basic-exhaustion:
- shard-skl: NOTRUN -> [WARN][15]
